February 18th 2012


  Buy Issue 2869
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Federal Coalition commits to defending marriage

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The party that has lost its way

CLIMATE CHANGE I: Iceland data "doctored" to back global warming

CLIMATE CHANGE II: Three top scientists debunk NSW govt sea-level scare

AS THE WORLD TURNS

EDITORIAL: How to address the boat people crisis

COVER STORY / DEFENCE: Australia's future in the US alliance

INDUSTRY POLICY: What will come after the mining boom?

UNITED STATES: Rick Santorum and the road to the White House

SOCIETY: Eight myths about legalising hard drugs

FAMILY: Feminism the sworn enemy of families

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Planned Parenthood's protection racket

OPINION: The case for the European Union

CINEMA: Britain's first woman PM

BOOK REVIEW Master historian's book a delight to read

BOOK REVIEW Surviving Cambodia's killing fields

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED:
The party that has lost its way


by national correspondent

News Weekly, February 18, 2012

That Labor MPs are agonising over having to choose between a leader that the voters do not trust and a potential leader that they themselves do not trust is a shocking indictment on Australia’s oldest political party.

In contrast to the Liberal Party, which has had a tendency to aloofness toward its past leaders, the Labor Party was traditionally loyal to its leaders, past and present.

Often the party clung to leaders well passed their use-by date. Think of Gough Whitlam who was given another chance in 1977 to lead the party after the 1975 debacle, only to be humiliated a second time. Labor leaders (even the average ones) were honoured for their contribution to the wider “Labor movement” — in itself a phrase barely used any more.

The modern Labor Party, by contrast, with one eye on the polls and with its MPs infected by the disease of personal ambition and a sense of entitlement, is prepared to tear down even a prime minister when things start to get rough.

Kevin Rudd was removed because, in Julia Gillard’s own words, “the Government had lost its way”.

Now many in the party want him back because they fear that without him Labor will be annihilated at the coming election. Despite Labor’s lack of faith in him, Rudd remains popular with voters, according to polls.

If it were the case that Labor had lost its way back then, then things have gotten worse under Julia Gillard.

There have been fundamental breaches of faith with voters, the entering into a corrosive alliance with the left-wing Greens, an unnecessary tax on carbon dioxide emissions that will be higher and more pervasive than any other in the world, and university student style stunts from the prime ministerial staff that result in Julia Gillard herself suffering the ignominy of being bundled into her car by her security officers without a shoe.

There has been knee-jerk decision-making such as banning cattle trade with Indonesia and policy ineptitude exemplified by Australia’s current inability to keep the northern border of the nation secure from boat arrivals resulting in the deaths of hundreds of people. The list goes on.

With nothing seeming to have worked, Ms Gillard is now usurping the role of the Treasurer Wayne Swan and acting as Government spokesperson on economic matters.

Why? Because that is the only good story currently worth telling, while the carbon tax is not mentioned by anyone because voters don’t want it.

Rudd (according to the polls) at least has a chance to win the next election, and, despite the deep antipathy with which he is held in sections of the party, is seen as worth bringing back.

Yet Rudd himself was originally installed only because the Labor Party had burnt a series of leaders — Kim Beazley, Simon Crean and Mark Latham — and had run out of ideas on how Labor could beat John Howard.

Rudd was simply another experiment. After failing with a “radical” in Mark Latham, Rudd was promoted because he would be a safe conservative alternative to Howard, not because he was liked or admired in the party.

It worked for a while. Rudd was “Howard-lite”. He was a churchgoer; he was socially conservative; he was not beholden to the unions.

But as time went on, Rudd’s flaws surfaced. He proved to be more of a bureaucrat than a politician. His decision-making and his office were chaotic. He preferred the adulation of youngsters on his staff to having hard-headed advisers, and his overblown rhetoric trapped him into promises that were impossible to keep.

There is no assurance that the traits that caused Labor MPs to turn against him have been fixed.

The fact is that Labor’s problems are fundamental and go beyond its choice of a leader.

The party has run out of ideas — or, even more fundamentally, does not know what it believes in.

It now “believes” in a carbon tax regardless of the logic or the necessity of such a tax.

It “believes” in same-sex marriage regardless of the fact that its leaders (Rudd and Gillard) do not.

It is a sorry mess.

Now Ms Gillard is putting all her eggs into the economic basket, and on Labor’s record of being good economic managers.

This is a desperate and dangerous political strategy.

Given Australia’s vulnerability as a small trading nation, with its thin economic base and a small population, and given that the world’s economy is undergoing a painful process of de-leveraging not seen since the 1930s Great Depression, Australia remains vulnerable to events way beyond the control of the federal Treasury.

If the winds of the global slump blow Australia’s way, there will be very little that a Gillard or Rudd Government can do to stop it.

Labor’s strategy of taking pride in its management of the economy seems foolish in the extreme, but given the track record it should come as no surprise. 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm