October 29th 2011

  Buy Issue 2863

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Why are we opting for smaller families?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Gillard Government in terminal meltdown

CHINA: Looming credit crisis could stymie China's growth

CIVILISATION: Universities dispensing knowledge without wisdom

ABORTION: Queen's first cousin fights for rights for the unborn


ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Milestones to economic Armageddon

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Iranian plot to kill Saudi man in Washington

FAMILY LAW: Labor/Greens to dump Howard's shared parenting laws

NEW SOUTH WALES: Tribunal rejects homosexual vilification complaint

FREE SPEECH I: The Andrew Bolt case and free speech

FREE SPEECH II: Truth-telling now denounced as hate speech

UNITED STATES: Sex-change procedure for 11-year-old boy

MEXICO: Marriage ... with a two-year expiry date!


BOOK REVIEW It's all so hard ...

BOOK REVIEW How Montgomery's stepson escaped the Nazis

Books promotion page


Tribunal rejects homosexual vilification complaint

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, October 29, 2011

In an important test case, the NSW Anti-Discrimination Tribunal has ruled against a homosexual activist’s claim that public comments on the subject amounted to vilification.

Had the decision gone the other way, it would have severely restricted the right of public comment on homosexuality.

The case arose when John Cunningham, a candidate of the One Nation party in the last federal election, was contacted by a homosexual newspaper, City Voice, during the election and asked his views on homosexuality.

Mr Cunningham gave a telephone interview to the editor of City Voice in August last year. Subsequently, City Voice published a report headed, “Gays need ‘rehab’”.

It said, “Gays and lesbians are ‘unfortunates’ and should undergo ‘psychiatric rehabilitation’, the One Nation candidate for Kingsford-Smith, John Cunningham, has told City Voice.”

It further quoted Mr Cunningham as saying, “I have a completely Christian approach and feel very sorry for men and women who are inflicted with this.”

The newspaper published his comments, and also published an editorial and a number of letters criticising him. A local newspaper, Southern Courier, also picked up the story, and publicly criticised Mr Cunningham.

The Southern Courier quoted Mr Cunningham as saying, “I saw many of the unfortunates [homosexuals in Oxford Street] and my approach is for their psychiatric rehabilitation.

“They’ve lost quite a number from AIDS. It’s totally opposed to the words of Christ. I have a completely Christian approach and feel very sorry for men and women who are afflicted with this.”

The newspaper continued, “Mr Cunningham said he had always been courteous to homosexuals and had the deepest sympathy for them.

“When asked what he had to say to the homosexual community in Kingsford Smith, he replied: ‘I wish you well and hope one day your matters are sorted in conjunction with medical professionals’.”

However Gary Burns, a homosexual activist, lodged a complaint alleging that the comments attributed to John Cunningham in City Voice and the suburban newspaper amounted to homosexual vilification.

After a two-day hearing before the NSW Anti-Discrimination Board, the board rejected the claims that Mr Cunningham’s comments breached the NSW Anti-Discrimination Act.

It said, “The Tribunal observed Mr Cunningham and heard him give his evidence. We formed the view that he was genuinely attempting to give his truthful recollection of what occurred.

“He was prepared to make appropriate concessions, even when they may not have appeared to be in his interest. We accept his evidence as it was elucidated in cross examination.”

The tribunal said, “To describe people as ‘unfortunates’ is usually an expression of a view that those persons deserve sympathy and perhaps help rather than an expression of disparagement or contempt.

“There was nothing in what the respondent [John Cunningham] said or in the way in which it was said or reported which would provide a foundation for concluding that his description of the homosexual persons whom he had observed in Oxford Street while he was working there or even all homosexual persons as ‘unfortunate’ or ‘unfortunates’ was likely to stir up feelings of contempt or ridicule.

“This is especially so for those among the readership of City Voice who were homosexual. It might be thought more likely for those readers that they would have felt contempt or ridicule for the respondent, not homosexuals.”

The tribunal continued, “The Tribunal is of the view that an ordinary, reasonable reader would appreciate that use of the words ‘afflicted’ or ‘inflicted’ to describe homosexuals or AIDS sufferers would not cause him or her to feel contempt for or to ridicule those persons or a group of such persons.

“The reader may or may not agree with the view that homosexuality was an affliction but ‘afflicted’ or ‘inflicted’ are not words calculated to incite contempt or ridicule for the persons said to be afflicted.”

The tribunal also examined the complainant’s suggestion that it was seriously contemptuous to describe homosexuality as a psychiatric illness.

It said, “Suggesting that someone receive treatment or rehabilitation for a psychiatric condition is consistent with concern and respect for that person. It does not necessarily or even ordinarily bespeak contempt for or ridicule of the person.”

It added, “In the circumstances of this case, the Tribunal finds that giving public expression to the view that homosexual people have a problem that could be addressed by psychiatric rehabilitation would not cause the ordinary, reasonable reader to understand that he or she was being incited to feel contempt for or to ridicule such people.”

The tribunal also found that John Cunningham had acted reasonably, and in good faith, and the public interest, in conveying his views. 

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal, June 5-6, 2019: An account from the live streaming

NATIONAL AFFAIRS A Q&A to clarify issues in Cardinal Pell's appeal

EDITORIAL Religious freedom: the political and legislative challenges

COVER STORY Transgender birth certificates: No sex, please, we're Victorian

COVER STORY John Setka, for all his faults, is the perfect scapegoat

COVER STORY Anthony Albanese: NSW left factional warlord takes charge

SPECIAL FEATURE Author Rod Dreher brings St Benedict to bear on our decline and fall

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm