July 23rd 2011

  Buy Issue 2856

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Carbon tax: putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop

TAXATION: Single-income families the biggest losers

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Greens - bad for Coalition, worse for Labor

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE I: ALP bent on overturning traditional marriage

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE II: New York embraces same-sex marriage

EUTHANASIA: Bob Brown's plan to introduce euthanasia via the ACT


FOREIGN TRADE: Anti-dumping rhetoric no assistance to local industry

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Thai election result offers hope for the future

ASIA: The Republic of China is reborn on Taiwan

POPULATION POLICY: Moscow summit highlights threat of depopulation

POLITICS: Why conservatives are the new radicals

EDUCATION: Greens terrorising our children

SOCIETY: How cyber-porn breeds cyber-cowards

OPINION: Why don't we speak clearly about Islam?


BOOK REVIEW How our media let us down

BOOK REVIEW Australia's aviation pioneers

Books promotion page


Single-income families the biggest losers

by Margaret Butts

News Weekly, July 23, 2011

In the comments about Julia Gillard’s carbon tax, little attention has been paid to the insult she delivered to unwaged mothers in her speech to the nation on Sunday, July 10. That she was unaware she was insulting full-time homemakers only compounds the offence.

I heard her speech on a car radio and was so incensed I made several efforts to get a full transcript to ensure I had heard it correctly.

However, newspapers have only published edited transcripts, and at the time of going to press her office has said the full speech is not yet available despite several requests they had received. On such an important issue the delay hardly suggests efficiency.

This is what I heard Julia Gillard say: “I believe in the benefits and dignity of work. I believe in creating jobs and increasing workforce participation, not only for the financial benefits but for the sense and purpose of doing a job.”

She then went on to say she was increasing the tax-free threshold from the current $6,000 to $18,200 from July 1, 2012, and to $19,400 from July 1, 2015.

Clearly, what Gillard means by the benefits and dignity of work does not include the work done by unwaged mothers caring for their young children themselves. Their families will not benefit from the new double tax-free threshold (total $36,400) available to families where both parents are in paid work and who may also be eligible to receive child-care subsidies.

While there is some assistance via Family Tax Benefit B to single-income families to compensate for the lack of a second tax-free threshold, this cuts out where the wage-earner earns $60,000 or more. An income of $60,000 for a family with two children is not a high income, especially if that family is aiming to provide non-government education for their children.

Why is it considered “work” if a stranger cares for and bottle-feeds an infant in a child-care centre, but not “work” if a mother cares for and breastfeeds her infant herself? Gillard’s statement that the “dignity of work” and “sense of purpose” apply only to paid work is demoralising to mothers caring for their young children themselves.

Many couples believe it is in the best interests of their children that they be cared for by a parent and not by a paid stranger in institutionalised child-care.

Clearly, Gillard’s aim with the enticement of a second tax-free threshold of $18,200 is to coerce more mothers into the paid workforce and is chillingly reminiscent of the slogan over Nazi slave-labour camps: Arbeit macht frei (“Work sets you free”).

Mrs Roslyn Phillips, of Family Voice Australia (FAVA), asks poignantly why single-income two-parent families are being penalised: “The big losers from the carbon tax could well be single-income families where one parent (usually Mum) works at home providing optimal care for the younger kids, while Dad brings home the bacon to feed them all.

“These traditional families are already worse off than families where both parents work outside the home. The latter enjoy two tax-free thresholds (2 x $6,000) and lower tax rates thereafter, while single-income families have only one tax-free threshold ($6,000) and higher tax rates. The Family Tax Benefit B only partly compensates for this big difference.

“With a tripling of the tax-free threshold, traditional families are left even further behind — yet these are the families who are more likely to peg their clothes on the line rather than use electric dryers, grow their own veggies, walk their kids to school and generally adopt a cleaner, greener, more energy-efficient lifestyle.

“Why, in the name of reducing ‘carbon pollution’, are they being punished?”

Nationals leader Warren Truss warns that the ripple effects from the Labor Government’s carbon tax will grow to engulf every business and household as the costs magnify and the tax ratchets up.

His comment on the increase in the tax-free threshold from $6,000 to $18,200 was that what Gillard didn’t trumpet is “that she is also increasing the tax rate applying to lower income levels from 15 to 19 cents and from 30 to 33 cents — clawing back much of the assistance families can expect.”

Some mothers of newborns suffer from depression, and their plight is not likely to be eased by Julia Gillard’s babbling about the “purpose and dignity of work” or by headlines such as “Third child a real career killer and mum may never get to catch up” (The Australian, July 8, 2011, p.3).

Australianeeds some parents to have more than two children just to keep our population at replacement level.

Why can’t Prime Minister Gillard and Opposition leader Tony Abbott sing the praises of those couples who have more than two children and who sacrifice a second income so they can provide the optimum care for their young children?

Mrs Margaret Butts is a mother of seven and Victorian co-ordinator of Endeavour Forum, Inc. 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am