June 25th 2011

  Buy Issue 2854

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Indonesian cattle export ban: a gesture of futility

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Who might succeed Julia Gillard?

TAXATION: Canberra must abandon the mineral tax

FAMILY LAW I: How widespread are false allegations of abuse?

FAMILY LAW II: Creating another stolen generation?

MEDIA: The other side of the Indonesian cattle story

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Swindling America's youth

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: China's growth is unsustainable

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Why Portuguese voters punished spendthrift Government

EUROPE: Germany to demand high price for saving Greece

VICTORIA: Coalition pledge to restore freedom of religion

CHILDHOOD I: Can self-regulation curb sexualised advertising?

CHILDHOOD II: Radical agenda for "transgendering" our children

EUTHANASIA: Death of euthanasia practitioner

OPINION: Security checks in a time of terrorism

VIETNAM WAR: Australian heroism at Battle of Long Tan

BOOK REVIEW: What happens when adolescents refuse to be educated?

Books promotion page

BOOK REVIEW Progressive conservatism


Death of euthanasia practitioner

by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, June 25, 2011

America’s “Doctor Death”, Jack Kevorkian, passed away on June 3. He was famous for having helped to kill over 100 people — and he was proud of it.

Although Kevorkian is now standing before his Maker, there are plenty more “have needle, will travel” types. In Australia we still have Dr Philip Nitschke promoting his pro-death wares.

What is it about these public figures who are so fixated on death? They really are an eerie lot — ghoulish even. Their personal lives seem as strange as their public lives. Consider Derek Humphry, who founded the pro-euthanasia Hemlock Society in 1980.

In a suicide note, Humphry’s second wife said that her husband had murdered his previous wife and drove her to her own death. This jarring story is found in Rita Marker’s important 1993 volume, Deadly Compassion: The Death of Ann Humphry and the Case Against Euthanasia.

Philip Nitschke is still going at it here, and is perhaps most famous for seriously arguing that suicide pills should be made readily available in supermarkets. He even said that depressed teenagers should be able to get access to these kill pills.

But it is to Dr Jack Kevorkian that I turn the rest of my attention. Such was his influence that he even made it onto the cover of Time magazine back in May 31, 1993. A large photo of a smiling Kevorkian was accompanied by the text: “Doctor Death: Dr Jack Kevorkian is back on his suicide crusade. Is he an angel of mercy or a murderer?”

A number of pieces have been written on this man since his death. Two are worth highlighting here. American bioethicist and award-winning author Wesley J. Smith has been fighting the culture of death for decades now and is fully acquainted with the horrors of euthanasia in general, and the mayhem caused by Kevorkian in particular.

Says Smith: “Kevorkian’s actual motives in pursuing his assisted suicide campaign were grotesquely utilitarian. He believed that nearly anyone who wanted to die should have access to euthanasia, writing for example, that the Jonestown victims should have been allowed to be dispatched by a professional euthaniser.

“He advocated setting up euthanasia clinics, which he called ‘obitoria’, at which suicidal people could couple their deaths with organ-harvesting and medical experimentation.”

He continues: “Indeed, the point of his whole campaign was to ultimately fulfil his ghoulish obsession to experiment on the bodies of people he was euthanasing. Here is how he put it on page 214 of his book, Prescription Medicide: ‘…What I find most satisfying is the prospect of making possible the performance of invaluable experiments or other beneficial medical acts under conditions that this first unpleasant step can help establish — in a word, obitiatry (sic)…’.”

What worries Smith — and so many of us — is why he was treated as such a celebrity.

Writes Smith: “I think there are several factors at work. First, we live in an era that extols and admires the social outlaw.

 “Second, a large segment of our increasingly secularised society disdains moralism, fixed principles of right and wrong involving individual behaviour, and dreads anything that smacks of ‘judgmentalism’. These phenomena seem particularly potent when someone defies values deemed to reflect Judaeo/Christian religious dogma, such as the general disfavour of suicide.

“Third, giving moral support to the suicides of ill and profoundly disabled people who want to die arises naturally in an era in which the emotional narrative and Oprah culture drive public opinion.

“Finally, and perhaps most importantly, ‘compassion’ has become the great justifier for breaking laws and violating social norms. Once Kevorkian stopped talking openly about obitiatry and began proclaiming that he was motivated by his care for suffering patients — even calling himself ‘Dr Life’ in an interview with Barbara Walters — everything changed. His poll numbers rose substantially, the media fawned, and juries repeatedly refused to convict him for crimes he had clearly committed.

“To paraphrase an old rock anthem, nihilism strikes a beat, into your heart it will seep. As the Canadian journalist Andrew Coyne wrote in 1994, decrying the strong public support of Robert Latimer, who murdered his 12-year old daughter because she had cerebral palsy, ‘A society that believes in nothing can offer no argument even against death. A culture that has lost its faith in life cannot comprehend why it should be endured’.” (Wesley J. Smith, “Dr Death dies”, ToTheSource, June 8, 2011).

Canadian political and cultural commentator Mark Steyn has also penned a piece, or rather reproduced an older article he had written on the man in 1998. It too is worth quoting. He recalls how America’s 60 Minutes program brought in Kevorkian to kill a middle-aged man on prime-time television:

Writes Steyn: “With the Doctor’s okey-doke ringing in his ear, 52-year-old Tom Youk, a sufferer from Lou Gehrig’s disease, departed this life, just in time for the commercial break.

“Thus, the old Kevorkian okey-dokey: you put the needle in, you take the needle out, you put the needle in, and you watch him shake about. Afterwards, the octogenarian Wallace put a few questions to Dr K., who looked at him with the genial anticipation a cougar reserves for tomorrow’s lunch. Why do this on network television? Easy, said Dr Death. ‘Either they go or I go.’

“He was, in fact, referring to the state of Michigan’s prohibitions on murder. There are already laws against physician-assisted suicide, but, after three acquittals, no prosecutor is anxious to drag the Doc into court again.

“Indeed, one county attorney was elected on the specific platform that he wouldn’t waste any more tax revenues prosecuting Dr K: nothing is certain but death and taxes, so it seems foolish to blow the latter on investigating one man’s zeal for the former. Hence the Doctor’s decision to raise the stakes from merely assisting to actively killing.

“A few days after the broadcast, the county attorney, goaded into action, charged Dr Kevorkian with first-degree murder. If he’s convicted, the Doc says he’ll go on hunger strike and kill himself. Wow, talk about taking your work home with you.

“With his severely cropped white hair and the unnerving random smile of a Hollywood serial-killer, Jack Kevorkian is not the pin-up boy the ‘mercy-killing’ movement would wish. As a doctor, he’s never had a patient he’s made better. He was a pathologist before he got into the killing business.

“He’s also an artist who paints whereof he knows: an exhibition of recent art works a year or two back drew heavily on his fondness for skulls and severed heads. Then he diversified into organ donation, promoting the harvesting of death-row inmates and showing up at press conferences waving miscellaneous spare parts yanked, none too neatly, from his latest patients.

“When he turned up at a local hospital offering his most recent client’s kidneys, one of his lawyers could stomach no more. Michael Odette’s seven-year-old son said, ‘Dad, you shouldn’t represent him. They should throw him in jail and melt the key.’ ‘That kind of did it for me,’ said Mr Odette.”

Steyn notes the obvious connection with abortion: “It’s hard to believe that our increasing enthusiasm for hastening death isn’t connected to our well-established practice of denying life: abortion and euthanasia sing their siren songs from opposite ends of life’s cycle.

“But what a shame the ‘pro-choice’ movement has no lurid Kevorkian figure to force the issues before 22 million Americans. Instead, under the bland cover of ‘a woman’s right to choose’, the abortionist beavers away in the shadows, and only in the rarest of circumstances is daylight shed on his art.

“One such occasion was 14 March 1997, when two boys playing at the foot of a steep embankment just off the Coronado Freeway in Chino Hills, California, came across some garbage from the highway and cycled home excitedly to tell their parents they had found boxes with ‘babies’ in them.

“They were wrong, of course. The boxes contained not babies but foetuses, and, as the Supreme Court has ruled, foetuses are not babies, not at all. But they looked like babies, albeit in incomplete configurations, like second-hand dolls: some were almost whole, the rest just a grab-bag of limbs and heads.

“It fell to Brian McCormick, the San Bernadino County coroner, to determine that there were 54 in all, dumped there by a careless trucker, who may not have been aware what precisely the clinic 30 miles down the road had given him to get rid of. He spent 71 days in gaol for ‘the improper disposal of medical waste’.

“And that would have been that, had not a few residents, feeling bad about the ‘medical waste’ dumped in their backyard, contacted Mr McCormick and offered to give the non-babies a proper burial.

“At which point, enter the American Civil Liberties Union: never mind that trucker, it was this religious burial service that constituted truly ‘improper disposal of medical waste’.

“The ACLU decided that, by handing over the medical waste ‘for the express purpose of holding religious services’, a civic official was facilitating a religious ceremony and, therefore, breaching the separation of church and state and threatening everyone’s civil liberties.” (Mark Steyn, “Jack in the box”, Steyn-
, June 8, 2011).

The death business is fully gruesome at both ends of human life. Whether killing the unborn, or the elderly, or those in between, there will always be some who think that such killing is a good thing.

However, for the sake of the living, it is a good thing that one prominent killer is no longer around to do his deadly deeds.

Bill Muehlenberg is a commentator on contemporary issues, and lectures on ethics and philosophy. His website CultureWatch is at: www.billmuehlenberg.com


Wesley J. Smith, “Dr Death dies”, ToTheSource, June 8, 2011.
URL: www.tothesource.org/6_8_2011/6_8_2011.htm

Mark Steyn, “Jack in the box”, SteynOnline, June 8, 2011.
URL: www.steynonline.com/content/view/4120/28/




All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Murray-Darling Basin Plan based on debunked science

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal to go to High Court

COVER STORY Extinction Rebellion: So, it's goodnight to us and a big welcome to mega-bucks

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ABC survey finds majority agree there is unfair discrimination against religious Australians

South Park Calls Out Transgender Takeover of Women's Sports

EDITORIAL A second chance to secure Australia's future

TECHNOLOGY Beijing's push to dominate world supply of electronics components

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm