April 30th 2011


  Buy Issue 2850
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

AUSTRALIA'S COLD WAR: Australia's Kim Philby? The case of Dr John Burton

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Julia Gillard face wipe-out on her "carbon" tax

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: "Carbon" tax an expensive fiasco

NUCLEAR POWER: Fukushima accident's long-term effects

GREAT BARRIER REEF: Science and the shutdown of our tropical fisheries

EDITORIAL: Feminism's war on women

GOVERNMENT: The rise of Australia's new political class

EUROPE: EU shaken by African refugee influx, financial crises

HUMAN RIGHTS: China and Vietnam human rights crackdown

ISLAM: 14-year-old girl lashed to death under sharia law

POPULATION: Anti-natalism rears its ugly head again

DIVORCE: Children of divorce/separation die five years earlier

CIVILISATION: Halting disintegration of the family

BOOK REVIEW: Thinker, writer and activist for freedom

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

EDITORIAL:
Feminism's war on women


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, April 30, 2011

It was curious that when Defence Minister Stephen Smith announced a battery of inquiries into the sexual culture of the Australian Defence Force Academy earlier this month, he also announced the lifting of the prohibition of women serving in combat roles in the defence forces, which is one of the long-term goals of the feminist movement.

The problem of sexual abuse of women in the defence forces has been around for years, and there have been inquiries into sexual exploitation of women, most recently on HMAS Success last year.

However, it would be a mistake to see this as simply a problem of military culture. In the case of the people at the Australian Defence Force Academy, the misconduct was a direct breach of the academy’s rules, and the young people involved had been in the academy for barely two months.

The defence forces are affected by the prevailing culture in our society. As the Canberra Times editorialised, “Some may blame this case on what many regard to be the defence forces’ debauched and misogynist culture. Yet the alleged conduct is not a military problem. It is increasingly common for young people to photograph themselves and their partners in risqué and sexual poses. With technology’s aid, our society is becoming more openly sexualised. Many teens think little of sharing naked pictures of themselves and others by phone or online, blind to the consequences they may later suffer.

“Just last month, Sydney researcher Nina Funnell published the findings of a two-year study of these practices, known as ‘sexting’.”

The Canberra Times concluded: “These changes in youth culture are taking place rapidly. They deeply concern many people, especially parents. But there is no cure-all: the technology that allows it cannot be banned, nor can its use be controlled effectively. The best defence young people have against exploitation is a strong grasp of morality; the empathy to know how other people are likely to feel; and the courage to say no to conduct that may harm others.”

There is also a problem of physical and emotional abuse of male cadets. I recall newspaper coverage of instances of it in the early 1970s, and the defence minister of the time promised to change the culture.

Men and women serving their country are entitled to be protected from bullying and abuse; but the current defence minister’s decision to open all combat roles to women can only have the effect of perpetuating the problem.

There is a huge volume of evidence that throwing women into combat roles does not work.

In the euphoria of the establishment of Israel in 1948, the Jewish state put women into the front line in defence of their country. However, the experiment was a failure.

John Luddy, a defence policy analyst at the Washington-based Heritage Foundation, has written that “women have been barred from combat in Israel since 1950, when a review of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War showed how harmful their presence could be. The study revealed that men tried to protect and assist women rather than continue their attack. As a result, they not only put their own lives in greater danger, but also jeopardised the survival of the entire unit. The study further revealed that unit morale was damaged when men saw women killed and maimed on the battlefield.”

The United States military has encouraged women to serve in combat roles. Recently, Helen Benedict wrote a book, The Lonely Soldier: The Private War of Women Serving in Iraq (2009), which exposed what really happens to women in combat.

Ms Benedict’s book, written from a liberal feminist perspective, showed that the experiment of putting women into combat has been a disastrous failure. It showed that women serving in combat units had been subjected to more or less continuous sexual harassment and frequent sexual assault. They emerged from war experiences traumatised and emotionally crippled.

A woman who served in Iraq, Chantelle Henneberry, wrote, “According to several studies of the US military funded by the Department of Veteran Affairs, 30% of military women are raped while serving, 71% are sexually assaulted and 90% are sexually harassed.

“The Department of Defence acknowledges the problem, estimating in its 2009 annual report on sexual assault, that some 90% of military sexual assaults are never reported,” she said.

It has been said, correctly, that war is hell. It is a regrettable necessity that men must be willing to sacrifice themselves for their country, and we are extremely grateful for their sacrifices.

But to put women into combat roles, in the interests of equality of opportunity, or gender equality, is a serious mistake.

As Dr Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, wrote in 2009: “The most important argument against the service of women in combat is moral. The decision to expose women to combat, to stretch and erase gender boundaries, and to normalise the exposure of women to violence represents a moral revolution”.

And it is a revolution that we in Australia must resist.

Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm