April 2nd 2011

  Buy Issue 2848

Articles from this issue:

ENERGY SECURITY: What Australia must do before the oil runs out

EDITORIAL: Nuclear panic: the first casualty is truth

China leading the way with safe nuclear energy

JAPAN: Why Japan will recover from Sendai quake-tsunami

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Water Act won't work: Harvard professor

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Gillard's line on same-sex marriage, euthanasia

EUTHANASIA: SA euthanasia bill sidesteps safeguards

DEVELOPMENT AID: Australia funding abortions in Mongolia

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Good intentions not enough to defeat Gaddafi

UNITED NATIONS: Gender diversity battle at UN women's session

CULTURE: Hollywood's war on our children

FAMILY AND CIVILISATION: The growth and decline of the Roman economy

FEMINISM: How feminism demeans women and destroys families

CINEMA: Stalin's forgotten victims remembered: Peter Weir's The Way Back (rated M)

BOOK REVIEW: Obama, the questions mount

Books promotion page

How feminism demeans women and destroys families

by Jonathon Sacks

News Weekly, April 2, 2011

America’s political left have unjustly blamed Sarah Palin for many things, but there’s one thing for which she is probably responsible: making feminism the hot topic that it has become today. Every couple of years Time and Newsweek ask “Is feminism dead?”, but all of a sudden feminism is being discussed and debated in the mainstream media.

Feminists have been weighing in to dictate their definition of feminism. Modern feminist Jessica Valenti defined it authoritatively in the Washington Post: “Feminism is a structural analysis of a world that oppresses women, an ideology based on the notion that patriarchy exists and that it needs to end.”

Picturing women as the victims of mean men is the engine of feminism. The feminists’ legislative agenda, from unilateral divorce in the 1960s, to the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, to taxpayer-financed day-care in the 1980s, to the Violence Against Women Act in the 1990s, to the Paycheck Fairness Act in the 2000s, is always wrapped in whines about alleged discrimination.

Feminist dogma decrees that women can never be successful under our oppressive patriarchy. Feminists complain that Hillary Clinton was denied the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008 because of (in Gloria Steinem’s words) “profound sexism”, and feminists never honour genuinely successful women such as Margaret Thatcher or Condoleezza Rice.

The most scholarly book written about the feminist movement by a non-feminist is Domestic Tranquility by Carolyn Graglia. She read all those tiresome books and articles by the feminist leaders, Betty Friedan, Germaine Greer, Kate Millett, Gloria Steinem and Simone de Beauvoir, and concluded that the principal goal of feminism from the outset has been “the status degradation of the housewife’s role”.

Mrs Graglia documented the fact that all branches of feminism are united in the conviction that a woman can find identity and fulfilment only by a career in the paid workforce. Gloria Steinem said “you become a semi-non-person when you get married”, while Simone de Beauvoir and Betty Friedan labelled the housewife a “parasite”.

Acquiescence in devaluing the role of full-time homemaker has become part of our culture, taught in women’s studies courses, and endlessly reiterated in the media. Conventional wisdom says that modern women should all be in the paid workforce because just being a homemaker is a wasted life.

Another contemporary feminist, professor and author Linda Hirshman, set forth a popular definition in the Daily Beast. She wrote that “support for abortion rights and ObamaCare were litmus tests for true feminism”.

That shows how out of touch the feminists are. The Republican victories in the 2010 mid-term elections, which demonstrated American opposition to ObamaCare, included many new non-feminist female House of Representative members, a senator and four state governors. Nearly all newly elected Republicans are anti-abortion.

The feminists don’t know what to say about Sarah Palin but they can’t resist talking about her. They can’t deal with the facts that she has a successful career, a cool husband and lots of kids; and it’s salt in the feminists’ wounds that she’s pretty, even while wearing glasses.

It’s clear that feminists never wanted gender equality; they want power for the female left, which is why they use the word empowerment so repetitively. The worldview of the women you see on television and in college classrooms is fuelled by feminist dogma about men, sex, work, marriage, motherhood and politics.

The female left got Barack Obama to make his first acts as President to overturn the anti-abortion executive order known as the Mexico City policy, to sign the Lilly Ledbetter Law to facilitate lawsuits against decades-old alleged employment discrimination, and to give women the majority of jobs created by the economic stimulus.

By November 2009, the feminists were ready to gloat and to reproach Americans for relying on “an outdated model of the American family”. They gave lavish publicity to The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Changes Everything, published by the left-wing think tank, Center for American Progress.

The 400-page Shriver Report boasted that we are now living in a “woman’s world”, and that “emergent economic power gives women a new seat at the table, at the head of the table”. The female left argues for women to be independent of men, self-supporting, sexually uninhibited and liberated from the obligations of marriage and motherhood.

However, the result is that women are chronically dissatisfied. The National Bureau of Economic Research reports, “As women have gained more freedom, more education and more power, they have become less happy.”

It’s time that young women have a handbook that sets forth the real goals and agenda of the feminists plus a non-feminist roadmap to a happy life. My co-author, Suzanne Venker, and I have provided this in our new book, The Flipside of Feminism: What Conservative Women Know — and Men Can’t Say.

Phyllis Schlafly has been a national leader of America’s conservative movement for almost half a century. She is founder and president of the Eagle Forum.
URL: www.eagleforum.org

The above article originally appeared in The Phyllis Schlafly Report (Eagle Forum, Alton. Illinois). Vol. 44, No. 7,, February 2011.
URL: www.eagleforum.org/psr/2011/feb11/psrfeb11.html

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am