November 27th 2010

  Buy Issue 2841

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The Greens' agenda, in their own words

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Lacklustre Gillard under fire from her own party

DIVORCE LAWS: Gillard Govt to curb fathers' access to shared custody

EDITORIAL: Why Labor could lose Victoria

CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS: New Zealand's experience with indigenous land claims

GLOBAL ECONOMY I: Ireland's woes show depth of financial crisis

GLOBAL ECONOMY II: Currency wars and the rise of China

KOREAN WAR: 60th anniversary of a nasty but necessary war

MEDIA: ABC denigrates former ASIO director-general

NEW SOUTH WALES: Tribunal rejects homosexual vilification complaint

HISTORY: Euthanasia foundational to Nazi program

OPINION: The difference between conservatism and Labor


BOOK REVIEW: COLONIAL COUSINS: A Surprising History of Connections between India and Australia

Books promotion page

Euthanasia foundational to Nazi program

by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, November 27, 2010
With euthanasia back on to the agenda, thanks to the pro-death Greens, we need to recall the lessons of history. Without remembering the past we will be doomed to repeat its mistakes. And one of the biggest mistakes in human history was the complicity of the medical community in the Nazi euthanasia programs.

Numerous important books have appeared in the recent past documenting how doctors, scientists and all sorts of other respected professionals became heavily involved in the Nazi death-machine. The online version of this article lists some key books and articles with which we all need to be familiar.

Here I simply wish to highlight, in a very brief and outline form, the Nazi euthanasia program.

The first and perhaps most important fact to point out is euthanasia in Germany preceded and led relentlessly to the Final Solution. Both were part of a continuum.

Indeed, we need to trace the ideological roots of Nazism back into history, with the writings of Darwin and his cousin Sir Francis Galton (who coined the term "eugenics", or "well-born") leading the way. But German thinkers closer to the time of the Nazis also played a major role.

Chief among them would be Alfred Hoche and Karl Binding who in 1920 released their influential book, Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens (The Authorisation of the Destruction of Life Unworthy of Life). The book spoke of the "incurable feebleminded" who deserved to be killed.

State-sponsored euthanasia was called for, with the idea that many human beings were not entitled to the right to life. Other writings appeared, with much discussion especially in the German medical community. All this helped pave the way for the Nazi programs when they came to power in 1933.

As Henry Friedlander says in the opening of his important book, The Origins of Nazi Genocide (1995): "Nazi genocide did not take place in a vacuum. Genocide was only the most radical method of excluding groups of human beings from the German national community. The policy of exclusion followed and drew upon more than fifty years of scientific opposition to the equality of man."

His massive 400-page volume (300 pages of text with 100 pages of reference material) goes into minute detail about the Nazi euthanasia program, and the complicity of scientists and doctors. He makes it quite clear that there was a very real continuum between the German euthanasia program - aided and abetted by the medical community - and the Final Solution.

He concludes his valuable study with these words: "Auschwitz was only the last, most perfect Nazi killing centre. The entire killing enterprise had started in January 1940 with the murder of the most helpless human beings, institutionalised handicapped patients, had expanded in 1941 to include Jews and Gypsies, and had by 1945 cost the lives of at least 6 million men, women and children."

Michael Burleigh also has written extensively on these matters. His celebrated 1994 volume, Death and Deliverance, is a very careful and detailed examination of euthanasia in Germany from 1900 to 1945. In 400 pages he makes the general case that "the 'euthanasia' program and the Holocaust are intimately related".

But, more specifically, his book "is an attempt to study the relationship between psychiatric reform, eugenics and government cost-cutting policies during the Weimar Republic and Nazi periods". He documents how such eugenics programs had been widely advanced long before the Nazis came to power.

Furthermore, he reminds us that Hitler did not accidentally stumble upon the euthanasia and eugenics initiatives. Instead, this program "was a carefully planned and covertly executed operation with precisely defined objectives. Those responsible believed in the necessity of what they were doing."

Just to bring all this up to date, it is of real interest that Burleigh's final chapter looks at one popular contemporary proponent of euthanasia, Peter Singer. He rightly points out that just as Binding and Hoche sought to relativise morality through a redefinition of the nature of personhood, so too does Singer today.

Robert Jay Lifton, writing in The Nazi Doctors (1986), carefully traces the complicity of the medical community in the Nazi program. He says that at the heart their involvement was "the transformation of the physician - of the medical enterprise itself - from healer to killer".

He interviewed a number of these medical personnel, as well as some surviving Auschwitz prisoners. Together the information gleaned from these interviews makes for chilling reading. He discovered that for those doctors and other non-medical professionals involved, they formed a vital and necessary step to wholesale genocide.

Without the help of these individuals, and "the destruction of the boundary between healing and killing", the Nazi death-machine would have been less likely to succeed. He argues that sadism and viciousness alone cannot account for what happened - what was needed was a "bureaucracy of killing".

Some 500 pages are given over to documenting the Nazi doctors. "In sum," he says, "we may say that doctors were given much of the responsibility for the murderous ecology of Auschwitz - the choosing of victims, the carrying through of the physical and psychological mechanics of killing, and the balancing of killing and work functions in the camp".

These and other studies make it quite clear that when medicine moves from its role of healing to a role of killing, such atrocities as took place 70 years ago are likely to recur. Sadly, we face the same temptation today. Doctors are now being asked to add killing to their job description.

As has been said so many times before, we must all learn from the lessons of history, or we will be doomed to repeat the mistakes of history. With so many calls for euthanasia now being made, more than ever we must revisit recent history so that its atrocities can be avoided.

Bill Muehlenberg is a commentator on contemporary issues, and lectures on ethics and philosophy. His website CultureWatch is at:

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

HUMAN RIGHTS A Magnitsky-style law for Australia?

COVER STORY Wildfires: Lessons from the past not yet learnt

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Bushfires: Never let a good crisis go to waste

CANBERRA OBSERVED Submarine build gives us a sinking feeling

GENDER POLITICS In trans Newspeak, parental consent is a 'hurdle'

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm