October 2nd 2010

  Buy Issue 2837

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: The DLP returns to Canberra

EDITORIAL: Greens unveil their social agenda

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Divisions within the Greens begin to emerge

THE GREENS: Peter Singer and the party of death

DIVORCE LAW: The continuing war on marriage and fatherhood

CLIMATE CHANGE: Queensland data challenges rising sea-level claims

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Has the United States finally run out of tricks?

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: A plot that wasn't and a plot that could have been

CHINA: Eighty-three million communist bludgers

UNITED NATIONS: Pro-life voices heard at Melbourne UN conference

ALP-Greens unity ticket (letter)

Voting fraud (letter)

Blaming the free market (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Greatest mass murderer in history / US college offers zombie studies / Education as indoctrination / Excluded from extracurriculars

BOOK REVIEW: HITLER STRIKES POLAND: Blitzkrieg, Ideology, and Atrocity, by Alexander B. Rossino

BOOK REVIEW: YOU CAN STILL TRUST THE COMMUNISTS ... To Be Communists (Socialists and Progressives too), by Fred Schwarz and David Noebel

Books promotion page

Voting fraud (letter)

by L.B. Loveday

News Weekly, October 2, 2010

Dr Amy McGrath OAM highlights just one of the possible rorts of the Australian voting system ("Absentee voting an open door to fraud", News Weekly, September 18, 2010).

I know of no other system where one can vote without some form of identification, and, prior to April 16, 2007, one did not even have to produce identification when enrolling; so most enrolments have never been verified, and people could enrol multiple times under different names.

I can go to a polling booth at opening time, give my neighbour's name and address and vote under his name, with or without his knowledge, before he arrives (better still if I know he is away). I can go to each polling booth in my electorate (there could be up to 60), voting at each under my name, his, or someone else's, provided I am prepared to answer "no" to the inane question "Have you voted elsewhere today?"

People living in a "safe" seat can change their address on the electoral roll to that in a marginal seat where their votes can affect the result.

Even worse, they can temporarily "move" to an electorate having a by-election. This happened in South Australia's Norwood state by-election of 1980 when up to 22 people were registered at the one address and the number of electors increased by around 10 per cent in the five months after a general election.

In the recent SA state election, one family claimed to have voted 159 times, including 31 times by a 17-year-old. Even the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), which in the past has buried its head in the sand, concedes it is possible.

This means, as Dr McGrath notes, that some are doing this - the only question is to what extent.

L.B. Loveday,
Gawler South, SA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Blackouts due to closure of coal-fired power stations

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY The Four Ideologies of the 21st century: Transgenderism, Libertarianism, cultural and Economic, and Radical Environmentalism

CANBERRA OBSERVED The left's appetite for change can't be satisfied

EDITORIAL Behind China's push for global power

COVER STORY Weatherill demand places Murray-Darling in jeopardy

CANBERRA OBSERVED Greens: wouldn't know a cowardly act if they did one

REDEFINITION OF MARRIAGE Government forms say it is fluid gender marriage

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am