December 11th 2010


  Buy Issue 2842
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

Political spin on climate (letter)

ENERGY: Good news! New oil and gas finds around the world

BOOK REVIEW: GOD'S BATTALIONS: The Case for the Crusades, by Rodney Stark

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION: Latest threat to Australian families and free speech

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Andrew Wilkie granted access to classified secrets

A party in love with death? (letter)

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: On abortion, slavery and censorship

Kenyan or Keynesian? (letter)

EUTHANASIA I: Dirty tricks exposed in SA euthanasia push

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEST: Protesters caused collision with Japanese whaler

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Politicians shirking their duty by bank-bashing

PROSTITUTION: Sydney 'the Amsterdam of the South Pacific'

VICTORIAN STATE ELECTION: Labor defeated, Greens blunted

BOOK REVIEW: THE COMING INSURRECTION, by the Invisible Committee

OPINION: Government strangling country people with red tape

EUTHANASIA III: A dying man pleads against legalising euthanasia

EUTHANASIA II: How SA's euthanasia bill was defeated

EDITORIAL: How long can the Gillard Government survive?

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

BOOK REVIEW:
GOD'S BATTALIONS: The Case for the Crusades, by Rodney Stark




News Weekly, December 11, 2010

Historical myths demolished

GOD'S BATTALIONS:
The Case for the Crusades

by Rodney Stark

(New York: HarperOne)
Hardback: 288 pages
ISBN: 9780061582615
Rec. price: AUD$39.95

Reviewed by Bill James

Their swords are rust,
their bones are dust,
Their souls are with the saints,
we trust.
- Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

Until the last few decades, the Crusaders were regarded as romantic figures. Walter Scott included a number of them in his novels, and quotes the lines above from Coleridge in Ivanhoe.

In the Robin Hood legends, King Richard's heroics in the Holy Land masked the Lionheart's actual role as a French-speaking monarch who treated England as a milch-cow to finance his territorial ambitions across the Channel.

The word Crusader was incorporated into the names of sports teams and Christian organisations, and was even used as a trademark for various products (Australians over a certain age will remember the Crusader brand of men's suiting).

The Crusades were attempts by the Roman Catholic countries of Europe, led by the Pope, and helped intermittently by the Erastian combination of Eastern empire and Greek Orthodox Church based at Constantinople, to win control of Palestine, particularly Jerusalem, from the Muslims.

There were eight Crusades during the period 1095-1291, and they were ultimately unsuccessful.

Jerusalem was taken in 1099, but its reoccupation by the Muslims in 1187 was followed by the gradual loss of all other Crusader possessions.

The following summary of the overwhelmingly fashionable current view of the Crusades might sound like caricature or travesty, but is not.

Here goes: The barbaric and bloodthirsty Christian West launched a brutal, unprovoked attack on the cultured, peaceful and tolerant Islamic civilisation in an imperialist attempt to win territory and trade, subjugate foreign peoples and force conversions.

Variations on this theme can be found in both lowbrow and highbrow culture.

The 2005 film about the Crusades, Kingdom of Heaven, presented what the mediaevalist Jonathan Riley-Smith described as "Osama bin Laden's version of history".

Academic discourse uses Edward Said's allegations in his Orientalism of the Western manufacture of "the Other" to elaborate its conspiracy theory about Western "Islamophobia".

For the 900th anniversary of the capture of Jerusalem, a group of Christians retraced the route of the First Crusade during 1999, apologising to Muslims along the way.

Certainly, some have argued that the New Testament envisages neither the union of church and state controlling armed force which emerged after 312 under the Roman Emperor Constantine, nor the cult of relics, holy sites and pilgrimages which made Palestine such a revered destination for Europeans.

However, given that these two phenomena had come into existence by the 11th century, how should we assess the Crusades?

It might be useful to list each of the myths associated with the subject, followed by Rodney Stark's exposure of it.

Myth Number One: Muslims have never forgotten nor forgiven the Crusades, and have nursed a bitter resentment of them for a millennium.

Reality: Muslim rancour about the Crusades did not emerge until the early 20th century, and did not become extreme until after the founding of the state of Israel.

Myth Number Two: The Crusades were unprovoked.

Reality: The Crusades were precipitated in the long-term by four and a half centuries of militant Muslim colonisation of the Middle East, North Africa, the Mediterranean and Spain, with the accompanying subjugation of the church in those places, and by recent bloody attacks on pilgrims and the Holy Land.

Myth Number Three: The Crusaders were motivated primarily by a desire for wealth and forced conversions.

Reality: Those who "took the cross" were financially impoverished by the expense of crusading; the Crusader kingdoms, far from existing on the exploitation of the population, had to be supported with subsidies from Europe; and there was no program of forced conversions.

Myth Number Four: The world of Islam was cultured, peaceful and tolerant.

Reality: Science and learning within Islam were largely derivative and inferior to the West's; Muslims perpetrated atrocities against Christian pilgrims; Muslim countries forced their resident populations of Christians to live in a servile state of dhimmitude.

Stark is not, and does not claim to be, an historian of the Crusades (he drops at least one clanger by having friars preaching Urban II's First Crusade in the late 11th century, despite the fact that friars did not come into existence until the early 13th century).

He does an admirable job, however, of providing a concise introduction to them, and of alerting readers to the ways in which they are being polemically distorted and exploited.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm