August 21st 2010

  Buy Issue 2833

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Australia's future in the balance

EDITORIAL: Our neglected area of policy: the Pacific

FEDERAL ELECTION 2010: Vote Green: a good way to wreck your investments

FEDERAL ELECTION 2010: Green policies 'anti-Christian': Cardinal George Pell

FAMILY POLICIES: Let families decide how they structure their work/life balance

LABOR PARTY: Emily's Laundry? Emily's List whitewashes website

POLITICAL IDEAS: The chilling creed of the radical libertarians

BUSHFIRES ROYAL COMMISSION: Lack of political willpower haunts Victoria

VICTORIA: Babies born alive, but left to die?

NEW ZEALAND: Kiwis wary of China's murky takeover bids

UNITED STATES: One unelected judge nullifies will of majority

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: US election a referendum on Obama's presidency

ASIA: Burma fast becoming China's new Tibet

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Sharia law's relentless advance / Mosque at Ground Zero / Britain slashes defence spending / Fay Weldon rethinks feminism.

BOOK REVIEW: HAWKE: The Prime Minister, by Blanche d'Alpuget

BOOK REVIEW: GEORGE ORWELL: A Life in Letters, selected and annotated by Peter Davison

Books promotion page

Let families decide how they structure their work/life balance

by Tim Cannon

News Weekly, August 21, 2010
Families want government support to raise their children as they please, and to have time together over the Sunday roast.

However, today, when parents are run off their feet working and looking after their kids, both sides of politics are bent on getting more married women with children into paid work and away from their children.

Labor and the Coalition have attached unjust conditions to paid parental leave. To receive the parental leave payment for a second or later baby, mums must put their young kids into outside care and go back into paid work for 10 months.

That's not helping mothers look after their kids. That's taking mums away from their babies and toddlers, so the federal Treasury collects more taxes from more paid-work mothers.

The starting point of a serious basket of family policies is to pay all mothers equally. Let families decide if mum cares for her children at home, or if she goes into waged work and pays for outside childcare.

The Australian Family Association conducted a Galaxy poll on the issue and found 71 per cent of parents and 79 per cent of 18- to 34-year-olds want equal parental leave.

Two principles underpin equality in paid parental leave for all mothers.

First, to be fair and just, all families should be treated equitably, allowing them to decide how they use their tax and family benefits.

Second, assistance to families should be at a level where families can choose whether both parents work or if one (mum or dad) looks after the kids and the home.

These principles recognise that kids are the future of the nation, that the state should invest in the family in the same way that it invests in education and health, and that the family is the best provider of social services to the young, the sick and the elderly. The family also provides these services far more efficiently and at lower cost than the bureaucratic welfare state.

As well as equal paid parental leave, the tax-free threshold should be raised sustantially, leaving more income with families.

Ultimately, the fairest tax system would allow families to split their incomes for tax purposes. France allows families to split their incomes between parents and children. In Australia, this could be introduced incrementally until at least mum and dad can divide their income(s) equally between them for tax purposes.

Family Tax Benefit B should be indexed to inflation and families should be allowed to choose between splitting their incomes or receiving this tax benefit.

Over time, the raft of other benefits for families, including the billions spent on institutional childcare, should be wound into a single family voucher, allowing families to choose their own work-family balance and how their children are cared for.

Australia also needs an affordable housing policy. The biggest burden on young families is the mortgage. Unfortunately, Treasury and the Productivity Commission have a view that government policy should be geared to getting more women with children into paid work, even when their kids are pre-school age.

Career feminists have campaigned for a similar range of policies, because they believe in using discriminatory economic "carrot-and-stick" policies to herd women with young kids into paid work.

All three have campaigned for requiring mums to put their younger kids into outside care in order to receive paid parental leave for the second and subsequent children.

This Federal Government's push for more mums in paid work is in direct opposition to state and local government policy of encouraging more people into voluntary work - from school tuck-shops to sporting clubs, from soup kitchens to walking clubs.

According to a study by the Institute of Family Studies, the value of voluntary work of by women, aged 25-44 years, was around $130 billion, or about 40 per cent of the total value of all voluntary work and equal to about one-quarter of GDP in 1997.

So, if more and more mums are herded back into paid work, is the welfare state supposed to pick up the bill for others being paid to do this work?

Unlike some European countries, Australia has a culture where the majority of families choose to have mum at home while the kids are pre-school age. Most mums don't work significant paid hours until their children are in their teens.

Families are fed up with Treasury and career feminist bureaucrats telling them how to live their lives.

From both sides of politics, families want a basket of policies that allow them to establish their own family-work balance and time with their kids.

Tim Cannon is a spokesman for the Australian Family Association. A shorter version of this article appeared in the Sydney Morning Herald (August 8, 2010).

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am