March 5th 2011

  Buy Issue 2846

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor pounces on divisions among Liberals

HEALTH CARE: Public hopes dashed by Gillard health 'reforms'

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Gillard's pseudo-PPL scheme a malign charade

PUBLIC WORKS: The urgent need to build new dams

COVER STORY: Planned Parenthood's activities finally exposed

EDITORIAL: Arab political turmoil: what's cooking?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Obama reaps whirlwind in the Middle East

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Can we avoid a second global financial crisis?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Business leaders call for national investment fund

REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY: Children's right to know their genetic parents

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Medical cover-up of fetal pain perception

TASMANIA: Euthanasia and assisted suicide back on the agenda

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: Bible banned at citizenship ceremonies

OPINION: The failure of multiculturalism

Brisbane dams fiasco 1 (letter)

Brisbane dams fiasco 2 (letter)

Legalising abortion (letter)

BOOK REVIEW: THE TROUBLE WITH CANADA... STILL! A Citizen Speaks Out, by William D. Gairdner

BOOK REVIEW: WHERE MEN WIN GLORY: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman, by Jon Krakauer

Books promotion page

Children's right to know their genetic parents

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, March 5, 2011
Children conceived by donor sperm or eggs deserve the right to know their genetic parents, an all-party Senate committee has recommended.

The committee, chaired by Tasmanian Liberal Senator Guy Barnett, has recommended sweeping changes to Australia's laws on artificial reproductive technology - especially donor conception - to bring them into line with what is already law in New Zealand and many countries in Western Europe.

The committee tabled its unanimous report last month.

What is particularly noteworthy, however, is that the Attorney-General's Department has effectively refused to co-operate with the Senate inquiry. This suggests that the present Government is not interested in dealing with the issue. It is now the responsibility of the Opposition in federal parliament to hold the Government to account on the issue.

The number of children born through assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Australia is relatively small, despite the massive publicity and substantial public funding it attracts. According to official figures, there were fewer than 700 ART births in Australia and New Zealand, compared to the total number of births in both countries of about 360,000.

While comprehensive statistics are unavailable, the report quotes evidence from one Victorian ART clinic that 60 per cent of its clients are heterosexual couples, 20 per cent are lesbians and 20 per cent single women. In other Victorian clinics, each group comprises about a third of the total.

The high level of single women and lesbians is a result of a Federal Court judgment, McBain v. State of Victoria and others, which ruled in 2000 that laws restricting access to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) to married couples were invalid. The judgment was confirmed by the High Court of Australia in 2002.

The Senate report found that the absence of laws regulating artificial reproduction in Queensland, Tasmania, the Northern Territory and the ACT meant that there was no effective supervision of clinics performing IVF on women, and that children born as a result of these procedures were being denied their rights to know their genetic parents.

It recommended that children born through ART should be entitled to the same rights given to adopted children.

According to research done two years ago by Professor Gab Kovacs, national medical director of Monash IVF, two-thirds of couples who conceive children using donor insemination have not told their children about their biological origins. (The Australian, January 8, 2009).

The Senate inquiry also found that the widely varying laws in different states meant that children's rights were not adequately protected. The report said, "During the course of the inquiry, a large number of submitters and witnesses expressed significant discontent with the current regulation of donor conception by the states and territories."

The Senate heard harrowing accounts from children born through IVF of the consequences of their lacking knowledge of their genetic identity.

It said: "Mr Damian Adams described the issues he faces as a donor-conceived person, who is not able to find out if he has any half-siblings because he does not know the identity of his donor: 'I am deeply traumatised that there could even be one half-sibling that I have never known and will never get to know, let alone the fact that there could easily be dozens. While never being able to know your own family is emotional enough, the fact that there may be numerous half-siblings is deeply disturbing on a level akin to being manufactured to appease the masses. We are human beings with biological and social families yet the ability to produce so many siblings is actually dehumanising'."

Narelle Grech, another child born as a result of IVF, said, "As for my DC [donor-conceived] siblings, I often wonder about them, whether we have met or I have walked past them in the street. Do they know they are DC? Will their parents ever tell them? Will I ever have the chance to meet any of them? Recently, with the wonder of Facebook, I was pointed to a friend of a friend who, they said, reminded them of me.

"To anyone else they might laugh and go along their day (sic). For me it meant looking at this person's profile and analysing everything about them. Looking for physical similarities and comparing interests, ages and so on. I think there might be something in this link, but what am I to do? Do I approach this person and potentially open up a Pandora's box for them? Don't they deserve to know the truth about their own identity if they are DC? And what about me? Shouldn't I be able to know my own siblings?"

Ms Grech also said, "I cannot begin to describe how dehumanising and powerless I am to know that the name and details about my biological father and my entire paternal family sit somewhere in a filing cabinet ... with no means to access it. Information about my own family, my roots, my identity, I am told I have no right to know."

The report also quoted parents and donors who were unhappy with the absence of information available under current practices, which are not regulated by law.

The committee recommended the establishment of a national register to which people born through ART and their parents would have access, that all IVF clinics should be registered and their practices supervised.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am