May 29th 2010

  Buy Issue 2828

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: A program for Australia's future

OPINION: Is Rudd's resources super profits tax constitutional?

EDITORIAL: Stop Rudd's super profits tax!

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor's 'destroy Abbott' strategy may backfire

FEDERAL BUDGET: No budget relief for single-breadwinner families

OPINION: The Henry tax review's better proposals

EARLY CHILDHOOD: Kinder kids quizzed on their sexuality

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: European debt crisis reveals globalisation's shortcomings

INDIA: India's 'Red Corridor' and the Naxalite threat

ISLAM: Feminists silent about women in burqas

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Radical ideologues deny innate gender differences

UNITED STATES: The politics of religion in America

Tony Abbott alienating Australian families (letter)

New York bomber 'disenchanted' (letter)

Canberra power-grab (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Absolutely terrified; Globalisation of higher education; Muslim woman becomes UK Conservative party chairman; British bobbies are being replaced


Books promotion page

The Henry tax review's better proposals

by Dr Lucy Sullivan

News Weekly, May 29, 2010
I would like to say a few words in favour of the personal tax and family aspects of the Henry Tax proposals, two of which address infelicities I have drawn attention to in the past.

First is the system of claims for work expenses which is so convoluted that it has driven large numbers of Australians to tax consultants, thereby often losing in fees the majority, or all, of their legitimate tax refund (see my article, "The problem of work-related tax deductions", National Observer, No. 80, Autumn 2009). This is to be replaced by a flat deduction for all in the paid workforce (unless greater expenses can be demonstrated), probably a fairer solution than my suggestion of total abolition.

The second is the recognition in family assistance of the greater cost of supporting adolescents as compared with younger children. The mid-to-late teens have emerged as a time of great peril and with continuing need for supervision; but the current tax/welfare arrangements (since the Hawke Government reforms of the 1980s) contrive to make this the period in the family cycle that most compels mothers, and the teenagers themselves, into the paid workforce to make ends meet. The Henry Tax Review recommends higher per child payments for older children, as was the case in the 1950s and 1960s.

I see it as a good move to get rid of the complexity of the Family Tax Benefits A and B, which make it difficult for families to keep track of where they stand, replacing them with a per child payment, which is a direct, not an indirect, response to the costs of children. With this in place, the greater needs of large families and multiple births will be met without the need for special categories of assistance. (Of course the adequacy of the payments is crucial.)

The much raised tax-free threshold will compensate for the abolition of the inadequate Type B benefit, and will make a low level of part-time work by mothers (when children are older) much more profitable than previously, when it merely resulted in loss of these benefits, and a high level of participation was necessary to gain any advantage.

I see nothing to object to in the goal of encouraging "parents" into the paid workforce, if this means primarily fathers, in these times when families with children are the group most likely to be entirely dependent on welfare. The progressive loss of benefits as paid work is undertaken has been the great impetus to this situation, and the Henry tax proposals should largely eliminate this invidious situation.

Encouraging mothers into the paid workforce is quite another matter at this time of concern for child safety and protection. The requirement that mothers seek work when their youngest child reaches four, rather than five when free public education begins, beggars belief. Any tax savings will be more than lost in the childcare subsidy.

Dr Lucy Sullivan is the author of Taxing the Family (Centre for Independent Studies policy monograph, 2001).

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am