May 29th 2010


  Buy Issue 2828
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: A program for Australia's future

OPINION: Is Rudd's resources super profits tax constitutional?

EDITORIAL: Stop Rudd's super profits tax!

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor's 'destroy Abbott' strategy may backfire

FEDERAL BUDGET: No budget relief for single-breadwinner families

OPINION: The Henry tax review's better proposals

EARLY CHILDHOOD: Kinder kids quizzed on their sexuality

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: European debt crisis reveals globalisation's shortcomings

INDIA: India's 'Red Corridor' and the Naxalite threat

ISLAM: Feminists silent about women in burqas

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Radical ideologues deny innate gender differences

UNITED STATES: The politics of religion in America

Tony Abbott alienating Australian families (letter)

New York bomber 'disenchanted' (letter)

Canberra power-grab (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Absolutely terrified; Globalisation of higher education; Muslim woman becomes UK Conservative party chairman; British bobbies are being replaced

BOOK REVIEW: O'MALLEY MHR, by Larry Noye

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Canberra power-grab (letter)


by Stephen Milgate

News Weekly, May 29, 2010
Sir,

Joseph Poprzeczny's article on federalism is long overdue. Successive federal governments and their bureaucracies have sought to weaken the powers of the states, claiming agency failure but overlooking glaring examples of Canberra's agency failure.

However, the states themselves seem intent on downgrading their responsibilities. The unelected government of COAG is becoming a de facto second national government.

This is no more evident than the recent move by COAG to implement a national (health practitioner) registration and accreditation scheme (NRAS). The NRAS legislation (that we maintain is not necessary to achieve a national register) contains the following clause:

"A regulation disallowed under subsection (1) does not cease to have effect in the participating jurisdiction, or any other participating jurisdiction, unless the regulation is disallowed in a majority of the participating jurisdictions.

"If a regulation is disallowed in a majority of the participating jurisdictions, it ceases to have effect in all participating jurisdictions on the date of its disallowance in the last of the jurisdictions forming the majority."

This in effect means that each state is consenting to its parliament being governed by a majority of other states. Our legal advisers say that this is contrary to the NSW state constitution and possibly others.

A growing number of voters must be asking why they should even bother voting in the next state election when parliamentarians are intent on handing over the constitutional functions of their state parliaments to the federal government or to COAG.

Stephen Milgate,
Executive Director,
Australian Doctors' Fund,
Arncliffe, NSW




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Labor's vision for a transgender world

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE For bullying, look left, look left, and then look left again

DOCUMENTARY Harvested Alive: killing Falung Gong in China

EDITORIAL Liddell closure: acid test for Turnbull

EUTHANASIA We risk turning our doctors into death dealers

COVER STORY Green energy push has left us blowin' in the wind

CANBERRA OBSERVED Assurances on religious freedom needed now



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am