May 29th 2010

  Buy Issue 2828

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: A program for Australia's future

OPINION: Is Rudd's resources super profits tax constitutional?

EDITORIAL: Stop Rudd's super profits tax!

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Labor's 'destroy Abbott' strategy may backfire

FEDERAL BUDGET: No budget relief for single-breadwinner families

OPINION: The Henry tax review's better proposals

EARLY CHILDHOOD: Kinder kids quizzed on their sexuality

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: European debt crisis reveals globalisation's shortcomings

INDIA: India's 'Red Corridor' and the Naxalite threat

ISLAM: Feminists silent about women in burqas

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Radical ideologues deny innate gender differences

UNITED STATES: The politics of religion in America

Tony Abbott alienating Australian families (letter)

New York bomber 'disenchanted' (letter)

Canberra power-grab (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Absolutely terrified; Globalisation of higher education; Muslim woman becomes UK Conservative party chairman; British bobbies are being replaced


Books promotion page

Canberra power-grab (letter)

by Stephen Milgate

News Weekly, May 29, 2010

Joseph Poprzeczny's article on federalism is long overdue. Successive federal governments and their bureaucracies have sought to weaken the powers of the states, claiming agency failure but overlooking glaring examples of Canberra's agency failure.

However, the states themselves seem intent on downgrading their responsibilities. The unelected government of COAG is becoming a de facto second national government.

This is no more evident than the recent move by COAG to implement a national (health practitioner) registration and accreditation scheme (NRAS). The NRAS legislation (that we maintain is not necessary to achieve a national register) contains the following clause:

"A regulation disallowed under subsection (1) does not cease to have effect in the participating jurisdiction, or any other participating jurisdiction, unless the regulation is disallowed in a majority of the participating jurisdictions.

"If a regulation is disallowed in a majority of the participating jurisdictions, it ceases to have effect in all participating jurisdictions on the date of its disallowance in the last of the jurisdictions forming the majority."

This in effect means that each state is consenting to its parliament being governed by a majority of other states. Our legal advisers say that this is contrary to the NSW state constitution and possibly others.

A growing number of voters must be asking why they should even bother voting in the next state election when parliamentarians are intent on handing over the constitutional functions of their state parliaments to the federal government or to COAG.

Stephen Milgate,
Executive Director,
Australian Doctors' Fund,
Arncliffe, NSW

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

COVER STORY Coronavirus: China must answer hard questions

HUMAN RIGHTS A Magnitsky-style law for Australia?

COVER STORY Wildfires: Lessons from the past not yet learnt

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Bushfires: Never let a good crisis go to waste

CANBERRA OBSERVED Submarine build gives us a sinking feeling

GENDER POLITICS In trans Newspeak, parental consent is a 'hurdle'

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm