May 15th 2010

  Buy Issue 2827

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Henry Tax Review’s vicious attack on miners, families

FAMILIES: How Henry tax proposals will undermine families

EDITORIAL: Rudd to bankroll human rights activists

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Verdict on the Kevin Rudd experiment

FEDERALISM: Hawke, Howard and Abbott seek to curb states' powers

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Fault-lines widen in world's financial system

UNITED STATES: Is President Obama a real-life Manchurian candidate?

KOREAN PENINSULA: Torpedo attack suspected in mystery sinking

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: China and the West: war without guns

UNITED KINGDOM: Christianity criminalised in Britain

EDUCATION: Maths Online: the new resource for students, parents and home-schoolers

SOCIETY: How biotechnology affects the family

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Children with gender identity disorder

OPINION: America: the most generous nation on earth

Let's create new Australian states (letter)

Labor and Liberals on childcare (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Canadian province may scrap human rights tribunal; Lithuanian president told to support Baltic gay march; UK Lib Dems' secret support base - Muslims; Stalin's Ukrainian famine; Why the left can't stand Sarah Palin

BOOK REVIEW: KEYNES: The Return of the Master, by Robert Skidelsky


Books promotion page

Labor and Liberals on childcare (letter)

by Alan Barron

News Weekly, May 15, 2010


Tony Abbott presents himself as a political conservative dedicated to a Christian values system. Yet when it comes to formulating policy, he appears to set aside these beliefs.

Once he stated that paid paternity leave would be brought in "over his dead body"; now he is enthusiastic about promoting his six-months paid parental leave funded by a levy on big business.

Before Mr Abbott acts in haste to better Labor's paid parental leave policy, he should reconsider his latest thought bubble on the subject. Currently, a woman who forgoes a full-time income in order to stay at home and care for her own children, is seriously penalised by the government for so doing.

A stay-at-home mum receives, on average, a total of $8,112, which comprises the $5,000 birth allowance and the Family Tax Benefit part B of $3,112.

On the other hand, a woman who goes back to paid employment after her paid parental leave entitlement runs out and who outsources her child-minding, receives not only the benefit of a full-time income, but also $13,383 annually, based on $7,342 paid parental leave plus childcare subsidies and rebates from the government to the value of $6,041.

In the first year of the birth of the child, a waged mother would receive 65 per cent more than a stay-at-home mother. In the following years, a waged mother would receive 94 per cent more than an unwaged mother. In other words, single-breadwinner families subsidise the child-minding arrangements of better-off families enjoying two full-time incomes.

Both the Labor and Liberal schemes are discriminatory, unfair and unjust. They are designed to entice women back into the paid workforce and financially penalise women who choose to stay at home and give their child their full-time care and devotion, which research shows, is the best possible care for a child.

A much better and fairer system would be to scrap the present arrangements and replace them with a voucher system, which would offer women a real and genuine choice as to how they want to organise child-rearing.

Alan Barron,
Grovedale, Vic.

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Time and timing are crucial to Cardinal Pell's appeal by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

COVER STORY The world has changed: Now for the new order

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm