December 1st 2001

  Buy Issue 2622

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: Afghanistan: After the fall of the Taliban - the tasks ahead

Editorial: Policies for John Howard’s agenda

Canberra Observed: Election outcome - reality and dreamland

Irian Jaya: Was Jakarta involved in West Papuan leader’s murder?

Queensland: Boswell beats Hanson, but what now?

Interview: Will Bailey answers development bank critics

LAW: International Criminal Court leads to legal uncertainty

Straws in the Wind

MEDIA: ABC electioneering

Letter: A bad mix

Letter: New patrol boats

Letter: Queue jumping

Interview with Bjorn Lomborg: Science versus name-calling

ECONOMY: The trade news from Doha

WA family debate hots up

DRUGS: Community drug prevention

Books: 'Meaninglessness: The Solutions of Nietzsche, Freud and Rorty', by Michael Casey

Books promotion page


Letter: A bad mix

by Peter Wilkinson

News Weekly, December 1, 2001


Professor H.M. Kolsen’s article, "Where Competition Policy Fails" (News Weekly, November 17) identifies a major problem small business encountered when reviewed under National Competition Policy guidelines. In short, "one shoe does not fit all".

Under National Competition Policy (NCP), there was pressure from unelected and unrepresentative bodies such as the National Competition Council to abandon the well-tested controls on alcohol and reinvent a "control free" deregulated liquor industry wherein the only criteria is "let liquor licences proliferate".

Yet the recent release of the National Alcohol Strategy: A Plan for Action 2001 to 2003-04 by the Commonwealth Department of Health insists that the key strategy for liquor licensing throughout the Commonwealth must be commitment to harm minimization. This Federal Government-sponsored Catch 22 contradiction makes it impossible for small business to plan and operate in a secure environment. To have one arm of government supporting the NCP goal, and another arm of that same government opposing it, is a hallmark of Orwellian totalitarianism.

Victoria is the most deregulated state in terms of availability of alcohol and proliferation of liquor licences. The economic impact of this NCP-inspired action against small packaged liquor retailers is devastating. Owners have seen their business’ values evaporate overnight. While the retail liquor industry was "restructured" by stealth, government provided nothing by way of compensation or industry assistance. The only winners are the chain stores that enjoy a market imbalance of power.

On the social side, there are early warning signs in Victoria of issues of public drunkenness and harmful behaviour. So pleased is the National Competition Council with the outcomes of the Victorian liquor achievements that this State is now touted as the model for the rest of Australia, even though the outcome is an economic and social disaster.

In the present day context of National Competition Policy the legislators and bureaucrats refuse to recognise the principle, "Deregulation and alcohol do not mix".

Peter Wilkinson,
Liquor Stores Association of Victoria,
Clayton, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

EDITORIAL The future of Senator Cory Bernardi

EDITORIAL Trump installed but the left refuses to accept it

COVER STORY Company tax proposal just made for Trump

EDITORIAL Nothing new among Trump's executive orders

EUTHANASIA Quebec, Dutch, Belgian and Oregon laws a 'mess'

QUEENSLAND Pro-life Brisbane marches as abortion vote nears

COVER STORY Free-trade policy sending manufacturing into free-fall

News and views from around the world

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm