June 26th 2010

  Buy Issue 2830

Articles from this issue:

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Retiring baby-boomers threaten us with bankruptcy; Ban PCs until children reach nine?; Obama too friendly with tyrants; Taliban hang 7-year-old boy punish his family

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd living on borrowed time

EDITORIAL: Taxpayer-funded political advertising scandal

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Labour and Coalition reject equality for stay-home mums

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd living on borrowed time

DEFENCE: Govt spending cuts put Army Reserve at risk

ISLAM: Australia set to accommodate Islamic sharia finance

MIDDLE EAST: Israeli nuclear-missile submarines stationed off Iran

UNITED STATES: Will debt bring down the American empire?

ENVIRONMENT: Tuvalu sinking? Much ado about nothing

ENERGY: Fuel import bill could negate mining boom benefits

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Thirty-year experiment with non-intervention

HUMAN RIGHTS: Why are feminists silent on Beijing's abuse of women?

WOMEN'S HEALTH: US doctors tiptoe around female genital mutilation

WORLD WAR II: When the screen is mightier than the sword

SCHOOLS: History wars erupt again with new curriculum

Sinister 'sex files' project (letter)

Rudd vs. Abbott (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Retiring baby-boomers threaten us with bankruptcy; Ban PCs until children reach nine?; Obama too friendly with tyrants; Taliban hang 7-year-old boy punish his family

BOOK REVIEW: BLIND SPOT: When Journalists Don't Get Religion

BOOK REVIEW: JUNGLE SOLDIER: The True Story of Freddy Spencer Chapman, by Brian Moynahan

Books promotion page

US doctors tiptoe around female genital mutilation

by Babette Francis

News Weekly, June 26, 2010
I am going to be really brave and say it: all cultures are not equal. There, I have said it. And if some equal opportunity activist wants to report me to the Australian Human Rights Commission, go ahead.

I'll start with my own country of birth first. In India, prior to British conquest, Hindus had the quaint custom of burning widows alive on the funeral pyres of their dead husbands; the practice was known as suttee.

In the 1840s, British army General Charles Napier enforced a ban on suttee, and a delegation of Hindu leaders approached him to complain that their ancient traditions were being violated. The general is said to have replied: "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them.... You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."

Illegally practised

I am reminded of suttee when I hear about the shocking practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) which involves ritual cutting and "circumcision" of young girls. It is a brutal procedure which causes pain, bleeding, infection and life-long sexual dysfunction. The practice, which was widespread in Africa, is now banned on that benighted continent, and is illegal in Western democracies, but is still allegedly practised secretly in Africa and by some immigrants in the US, Europe and Australia.

FGM became illegal in the US in 1996. Appallingly, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) this year was considering a "compromise" on the legal prohibition that would allow physicians to perform a "ceremonial nick" on the genitalia of baby girls whose parents request the procedure.

Janice Shaw Crouse, PhD, of Concerned Women for America, and author of Children at Risk (2009), commented: "Clearly, the AAP capitulated their principles for political expediency. They excused their 'nuanced' and 'culturally sensitive' decision on the basis that 'some families might take their daughters to other countries' for the entire 'circumcision', so their 'compromise' is meant to 'avoid greater harm'." (American Spectator, May 25, 2010).

The AAP intended the "ceremonial nick" for baby girls born into families among the 10 million Muslims in the US. As Mark Steyn put it, FGM is a "key pillar of institutional misogyny in Islam: Its entire purpose is to deny women sexual pleasure." (Washington Times, May 17, 2010).

FGM is not a medical procedure but a cultural, religious or social practice. It was common in Egypt, Sudan, Somalia and Mali.

The African Protocol on the Rights of Women prohibits "in all states" all forms of "female genital mutilation, scarification, medicalisation and para-medicalisation in order to eradicate them".

The World Health Organization estimates that about 140 million girls and women have endured clitoridectomies (typically performed between infancy and 15 years old) and live with the consequences - which, in addition to the immediate dangers of infection and severe bleeding, can include long-term problems such as repeated urinary-tract infections and childbirth complications.

The procedures are sometimes done under less than ideal circumstances and with crude implements - without anaesthesia and without sterilised instruments.

Crouse comments that today AAP members no longer use the acronym, FGM, choosing instead to use "female genital cutting (FGC)" or "ritual genital cutting". These terms are meant to be "neutral" and "descriptive" rather than culturally insensitive.

Ironically, they oppose only those forms of FGM which "pose the risk of physical or psychological harm" - as if ritual "nicks" have no such risks. One writer described the "harm reduction" as similar to "the difference between amputation and laceration".

Instead of protecting infants, children and young girls, the AAP has employed a "philosophical equivocation" to accommodate an inhumane Islamic practice that disfigures and subjugates women and denies them normal lives as wives and mothers. Worse, the AAP's accommodation gives legitimacy to a barbaric and illegal practice and ensures its continuation as a cultural rite of passage. Appallingly, the AAP's "compromise" was picked up for consideration by the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG).

Storm of criticism

Fortunately, responding to a storm of criticism, the American Academy of Pediatrics reversed its decision that doctors be given permission to perform a ceremonial nick on girls to keep their families from sending them overseas for the full circumcision.

It is to be hoped that RANZCOG also abandons this foolish and harmful idea. The compromise of a "ceremonial nick" ensures its continuation as a cultural rite of passage. Medical organisations should not tip-toe around cultural practices that are abhorrent and cruel.

All cultures are not equal.

Babette Francis, B.Sc. (Hons), is national coordinator of Endeavour Forum Inc.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am