June 26th 2010

  Buy Issue 2830

Articles from this issue:

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Retiring baby-boomers threaten us with bankruptcy; Ban PCs until children reach nine?; Obama too friendly with tyrants; Taliban hang 7-year-old boy punish his family

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd living on borrowed time

EDITORIAL: Taxpayer-funded political advertising scandal

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Labour and Coalition reject equality for stay-home mums

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd living on borrowed time

DEFENCE: Govt spending cuts put Army Reserve at risk

ISLAM: Australia set to accommodate Islamic sharia finance

MIDDLE EAST: Israeli nuclear-missile submarines stationed off Iran

UNITED STATES: Will debt bring down the American empire?

ENVIRONMENT: Tuvalu sinking? Much ado about nothing

ENERGY: Fuel import bill could negate mining boom benefits

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Thirty-year experiment with non-intervention

HUMAN RIGHTS: Why are feminists silent on Beijing's abuse of women?

WOMEN'S HEALTH: US doctors tiptoe around female genital mutilation

WORLD WAR II: When the screen is mightier than the sword

SCHOOLS: History wars erupt again with new curriculum

Sinister 'sex files' project (letter)

Rudd vs. Abbott (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Retiring baby-boomers threaten us with bankruptcy; Ban PCs until children reach nine?; Obama too friendly with tyrants; Taliban hang 7-year-old boy punish his family

BOOK REVIEW: BLIND SPOT: When Journalists Don't Get Religion

BOOK REVIEW: JUNGLE SOLDIER: The True Story of Freddy Spencer Chapman, by Brian Moynahan

Books promotion page

History wars erupt again with new curriculum

by Kevin Donnelly

News Weekly, June 26, 2010
Julia Gillard, the Commonwealth Minister for Education, and Stuart Macintyre, an academic from the University of Melbourne, argue that the new national history curriculum is balanced and that critics are wrong to label it left-wing.

They're wrong. Anyone reading the two syllabus documents, covering kindergarten to years 10, 11 and 12, can be left in no doubt that schools across Australia will soon be forced to teach a new-age and politically-correct view of history and Australia's place in the world.

History, like every other subject in the national curriculum, will now have to be taught through the politically-correct prism of aboriginal, Asian and environmental perspectives. Forget the importance of Australia's Western heritage or the impact of science, technology and industry in overcoming poverty and eradicating disease.

In the years K-10 curriculum, students are told to study the "contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to the Australian nation", the "significance of Dreaming and the perspectives and meaning in Dreaming stories" and to "explain the key features of Aboriginal and Torres Trait Islander societies".

In the 29 pages of the K-10 syllabus, "Christendom" is mentioned once and "Christian" also once, but only in the context of studying other religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Judaism and Islam.

Ignored is the fact that indigenous Australians, according to the 2006 census, account for only 2.6 per cent of the population and that Australia's language, political and legal systems and culture are Anglo-Celtic in origin and based on the nation's Judaeo-Christian heritage.

According to 1999 figures, 70 per cent of Australians describe themselves as Anglo-Celtic in origin, and, according to the 2007 census, 64 per cent of Australians are Christians. It's no accident that sessions of parliament begin with the Lord's Prayer and that Christian morality underpins much of our way of life.

After reading the history curriculum, you'd be forgiven for thinking that mainstream Australians are simply one ethnic group amongst many and that celebrating difference and diversity is more important than acknowledging what we hold in common.

While there is one mention of Australia's debt to Britain at the year 6 level, there is no mention of key documents like Magna Carta, concepts like habeas corpus, institutions like the Westminster Parliament or political concepts like the separation of powers.

Political correctness is especially strong at years 9 and 10. Topics like the "individuals and groups who rebelled against social conditions and society", "White Australia policy, exclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, voting rights of women" and "the origins and consequences of anti-colonial movements and civil rights movement" are ripe for being taught from a left-wing perspective.

It should not surprise us that there is no mention of socialism's failure as an economic system, the millions killed by communist dictators like Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, or that democratic ideals like "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" are uniquely Western in origin and steeped in Christian commitment and belief.

Year 11 and 12 students, once again, will have to study history through a politically correct lens. Students are told that they will learn Australian history "within the Asian context", and that what is taught will be in the context of indigenous people's "struggles for recognition and equality" and "the demographic and environmental consequences of growth".

Asking students to study "organised labour, including the union movement and the ALP", while ignoring the origins of the Liberal Party, is clear evidence of bias. Likewise, ignoring America's role in World War II, in Europe and the Pacific, reflects an anti-American sentiment widespread amongst the left.

That the history curriculum appears to have been written by culture warriors of the left most likely explains why, in the section on the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, only McCarthyism is mentioned, but not Stalin's Great Terror and purges nor the role of Ronald Reagan in defeating what he termed the evil empire.

The unit "Recognition and equality" reads like a beginner's guide to left-wing political indoctrination. Under the heading, "The struggles of oppressed and disadvantaged peoples", the topics listed are "Women's struggle for equality", "First Nations and the struggle for recognition and equality", "Apartheid in South Africa" and "Civil rights movement in the USA".

While Christianity is mentioned twice in the K-10 syllabus, there is no mention of it at years 11 and 12.

That a modern history curriculum, while including a host of left-wing ideologies and movements, excludes Christianity beggars belief.

Two of the most powerful and significant movements in the modern era are communism and Christianity. To focus uncritically on one, to the exclusion of the other, leaves students with a shallow and one-sided understanding of the past.

Dr Kevin Donnelly is director of the Education Standards Institute. He taught for 18 years in Melbourne government and non-government secondary schools and was a member of Victoria's Board of Studies. Kevin Donnelly is author of Australia's Education Revolution: How Kevin Rudd Won and Lost the Education Wars (2009).

You can examine and comment on the Government's proposed new curriculum at: www.australiancurriculum.edu.au

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Time and timing are crucial to Cardinal Pell's appeal by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY The world has changed: Now for the new order

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm