June 12th 2010

  Buy Issue 2829

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Financing of terrorism in Australia

EDITORIAL: BP scandal spreads beyond Gulf of Mexico

OPINION: Super-profits tax creates climate of uncertainty

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Beijing thwarts sanctions against North Korea

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Rudd Government planned showdown with miners

FOREIGN TRADE: China slowdown spells trouble for Australia

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Rudd and Abbott overlook stay-at-home mothers

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: The chilling reality of late-term abortion

ILLICIT DRUGS: Labor and Greens defeat DLP bid to ban bongs

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Regulators crack down on speculation

OPINION: Time to reclaim Australian history

ENVIRONMENT: Al Gore's actions speak louder than words

GREAT BRITAIN: Who will rescue Britain from its present madness?

Economic illiteracy (letter)

Statistically insignificant (letter)

ALP branch-stacking (letter)

The truth and Kevin Rudd (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: In praise of pessimism

BOOK REVIEW: THE WORLD TURNED UPSIDE DOWN: The Global Battle Over God, Truth, and Power, by Melanie Phillips

BOOK REVIEW: WHAT'S WRONG WITH ANZAC? The Militarisation of Australian History, by Marilyn Lake and Henry Reynolds

Books promotion page

Economic illiteracy (letter)

by Neil C. Fearis

News Weekly, June 12, 2010

In justifying his proposed resource rent tax, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd takes the populist line that the Australian people should enjoy a greater share of the so-called "super profits" that mining companies are currently earning by exploiting "their" mineral resources.

Putting aside for a moment the obvious point that these companies already make a substantial contribution to the revenue base through the payment of company tax, GST, payroll tax and other state and federal charges (not to mention state royalties and income tax payments by their thousands of employees), anyone with a passing familiarity with the Australian Constitution would know that mineral resources belong to the states where they are located and to the peoples of those states, not to the Commonwealth.

In this regard, the supposed analogy with the petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT) is flawed, since the PRRT taxes profits derived from the exploitation of hydrocarbons located offshore and, as such, within Commonwealth territory.

Mr Rudd's proposed super profits tax will cut in after the profit generated by a mineral project reaches the "risk-free" 10-year treasury bond rate (currently around 6 per cent). In contrast, the PRRT cuts in at a profit level 5 per cent above this rate.

To set the threshold for calculating a "super profit" at the treasury bond rate displays a fundamental misunderstanding of the risk profile of resource projects. Given the inherent risks associated with exploiting mineral resources, investors in such projects will typically be looking for a return substantially above the risk-free rate in order to justify putting their capital at risk.

To describe a return above the 10-year treasury bond rate as a "super profit" begs the rather obvious question of why an investor would risk his capital on a resource project that is going to be taxed at punitive levels when he could enjoy a risk-free return on his money by investing in treasury bonds.

That a federal Cabinet composed of individuals with little or no business experience - never mind experience in the mining industry - could display such economic illiteracy is perhaps understandable. Less understandable is why the federal Opposition and economic commentators have not pointed to these obvious flaws in Mr Rudd's sales pitch.

Neil C. Fearis,
Claremont, WA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs

News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am