February 6th 2010

  Buy Issue 2820

Articles from this issue:

FAMILY VALUES: Human rights and education

COVER STORY: Global-warming sceptic Lord Monckton visits Australia

EDITORIAL: Is Rudd Government planning a new tax grab?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Can the Abbott-Joyce duo defeat Kevin Rudd?

ENERGY: A climate policy that is good for Australia

FAMILY LAW: Will Rudd Govt roll back shared parenting?

VICTORIA: Lesbian couple are named parents on birth certificate

NEW SOUTH WALES: NSW Govt rejects adoption by same-sex couples

UNITED STATES: Gaping holes remain in passenger airline security

NATIONAL SECURITY: Global terrorist threat escalates

CHINA: Corrupt big business and the Communist Party

POLITICAL PROFILE: Not-so-secret agenda of Obama's 'science czar'

FAMILY VALUES: Human rights and education

UNITED NATIONS: UN skirmishes over meaning of gender

Tony Abbott defended (letter)

Condoms for Haiti? (letter)

Charles and Babette Francis (letter)

News Weekly name change? (letter)

CINEMA: Cameron's latest blockbuster Avatar (rated M)

BOOK REVIEW: LOSING MY RELIGION: Unbelief in Australia, by Tom Frame

BOOK REVIEW: THE WOLF: How One German Raider Terrorised Australia and the Southern Oceans in the First World War, by Richard Guilliatt and Peter Hohnen

Books promotion page

Is Rudd Government planning a new tax grab?

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, February 6, 2010
Clear signs are emerging that the Rudd Government will use the Henry Tax Review to justify a range of new or increased taxes, as well as cuts to family benefits.

Almost two years ago, the federal Treasurer, Wayne Swan, announced a review of Australia's tax system, chaired by Treasury Secretary Dr Ken Henry, and conducted by a panel of five people with academic, public service and industry backgrounds.

The terms of reference of the tax inquiry, called Australia's Future Tax System, made clear that it was an attempt to modernise Australia's tax system, reducing complexity and compliance costs to make it more effective in delivery of welfare services, while removing disincentives to both taxpayers and businesses.

Significantly, the terms of reference specifically excluded increasing the 10 per cent GST rate or broadening the base of the GST. The panel was instructed to "preserve tax-free superannuation payments for the over 60s; and the [Rudd Government's] announced aspirational personal income tax goals".

The review included consideration of federal, state and local government taxes and charges. It envisaged no reduction in the size of the public sector, and was to make recommendations to maintain the overall level of taxation as a proportion of the nation's GDP.

It was also asked to "take into account recent international trends to lower headline rates of tax and apply them across a broader base, as well as domestic and global economic and social developments and their impact on the Australian economy".

A Treasury discussion paper, released three months after the tax review was announced, gave the Treasurer little comfort. It said that existing tax rates on company tax in Australia were among the highest in the developed world, while taxes on wages (including personal tax, payroll taxes, etc.) were lower than the average of the industrialised nations of the OECD.

In releasing the report, Mr Swan distanced the government from its contents, saying it was just a discussion paper and that he would not be commenting on any of the issues it raised.

However, he went on to say that he did not agree with all the report's observations. (The Australian, August 8, 2008).

Since the report was commissioned, the global financial crisis has led to a massive increase in government spending, amounting to tens of billions of dollars, pushing the federal Budget from surplus into a massive deficit. Additionally, state deficits have also blown out, as a result of rising expenditure.

Ageing population

Although the final recommendations of the tax review were given to the Federal Government last December, the government declined to release them, although both the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, and the Treasurer subsequently foreshadowed major increases in costs related to health and the ageing population, which will have to be met by increasing taxation.

A couple of weeks ago, the Treasury Secretary, Dr Henry, made a speech in which he also foreshadowed increased taxes to meet higher health costs, and supported "environmental taxes to address some of the environmental challenges that we are facing today".

This could, of course, simply refer to the Rudd Government's emissions trading scheme; but it could equally refer to increased excises on petroleum products such as petrol and diesel.

Further, miners and the state governments are deeply concerned about leaked plans to impose a new super tax on the mining industry, based on the petroleum resource rent tax which is 40 per cent of taxable profits.

Ultimately, increased taxes are passed on to consumers, in the form of higher prices.

The prospect of rising taxes comes at a time when businesses and home-buyers face the prospect of further increases in interest rates. Late in 2009, the Reserve Bank increased official interest rates three times, and the largest private banks increased rates further again.

The business community is increasingly nervous about the deliberate leaks from government about new taxes.

Adrian Raftery, an accountant and tax commentator, said recently that accountants had been inundated with queries "as leaks emerge on issues such as superannuation access, capital gains tax (CGT) of family homes and fringe benefits tax (FBT) for charities".

For all these reasons, taxation is emerging as a major issue in 2010. The Federal Government's reintroduction this month of its emissions trading legislation, which imposes a new tax on energy, will reinforce community concern that the Rudd Government is intending to increase a raft of new taxes in 2010.

For the federal Opposition, taxation presents both a challenge and an opportunity. New or increased taxes invariably face a hostile response from the electorate. The challenge for the Opposition is to put forward credible alternatives to the policies of a Federal Government which has turned large surpluses into deficits, which will have to be repaid in the form of higher taxes.

Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am