April 17th 2010

  Buy Issue 2825

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Broad approach needed to boat-people saga

DEFENCE: Unmanned aircraft needed to patrol our seas

CANBERRA OBSERVED: What is Tony Abbott on about?

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE I: Rudd and Abbott schemes will punish stay-home mums

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE II: Maternity leave and the mother wars

COVER STORY / POPULATION: The philosophical roots of 'Demographic Winter'

BUSHFIRES: Victoria changes tack on fuel-reduction burns

CLIMATE CHANGE: Criticism of 'Climategate' inquiries accelerates

UNITED NATIONS: UN body seeks 'universal human right' to abortion

CHINA: Stern Hu convicted in kangaroo court

OPINION: All in the mind: Asian strategy and Australian big talk

TRADE UNIONISM: The most dangerous man in Detroit?

PORNOGRAPHY: Call for restrictions on 'soft porn' magazines

AS THE WORLD TURNS: India launches world's largest school voucher program; Child 'spies' to snoop on teachers; Mothers and fathers disappear from UK birth certificates; Will America break up?

CINEMA: Portrait of Nelson Mandela - Invictus (rated PG)

BOOK REVIEW : THE RETREAT: Hitler's First Defeat, by Michael Jones

Books promotion page

THE RETREAT: Hitler's First Defeat, by Michael Jones

News Weekly, April 17, 2010

Turning-point in World War II

Hitler's First Defeat
by Michael Jones

(London: John Murray)
Paperback: 328 pages
ISBN: 9780719569265
Rec. price: AUD$42.00

Reviewed by Michael Daniel 

With the hindsight of history, it seems almost incredible that Hitler dared to attack the Soviet Union in the deluded belief that the German Army could defeat it within a matter of weeks. His attempt is often compared to that of Napoleon Bonaparte, who in 1812 easily took Moscow, only to be forced to retreat by the onset of winter, which devastated the Grande Armée.

Operation Barbarossa, the 1941 German blitzkrieg invasion of the Soviet Union, in its early phases, achieved outstanding success. On the Soviet side, Stalin ignored reliable warnings of the Hitler's imminent invasion, and the Red Army easily fell prey to the advancing Germans.

Operation Barbarossa

Hitler's battle objective was to destroy the Soviet Union's capacity to fight and to capture Moscow before the onset of winter. Even observers in the West during the summer of 1941 believed that this would be the likely outcome of Operation Barbarossa.

Historian Michael K. Jones, whose previous works include Stalingrad: How the Red Army Triumphed (2007) and Leningrad: State of Siege (2008), recounts the Soviet repulse of the Germans as the latter advanced on Moscow. He draws primarily from eyewitness accounts of Soviet and German soldiers who took part in the struggle.

The early sections of the book describe the initial German onslaught, which place the nature of the Soviet counter-attack in its context. Soviet authorities justifiably feared the imminent capture of Moscow, and took precautionary measures such as secretly moving Lenin's embalmed corpse from its mausoleum to a safer location.

However, in August, the German battle priorities changed - the focus of the invasion shifted to the southern theatre. Germany was intent on capturing key resources, thereby depriving the Soviet army of its ability to continue fighting.

The delayed German advance on Moscow thereby gave the Soviet Union crucial breathing-space. By late October, the Soviets remained undefeated.

The autumn rains came, slowing the German advance. The onset of winter merely exacerbated the German army's plight. Observers began to see eerie parallels with Napoleon's failed 1812 invasion of Russia, when his forces were defeated by "General Winter".

Incredibly, some German units managed to reach locations as close as 20 kilometres from Moscow. However, at this stage the hostile weather halted their advance.

Moreover, the German army's supply-lines were overstretched. Older soldiers who had fought on the Eastern Front in World War I believed that they had been better supplied in that conflict. What is particularly astonishing is that the German army, so confident was it of a swift victory over the Soviet Union, did not bother to issue its troops with winter uniforms.

The result was that the fighting capacity of many units was severely reduced. Many troops suffered conditions such as severe frostbite; others simply froze to death. This exacerbated the battle fatigue of the troops, many of whom by then had been in combat for almost six months.

The German army notoriously failed to equip is forces with appropriate supplies, such as anti-freeze for tanks so that they could continue fighting in winter conditions. Thus much materiel was rendered useless.

By contrast, Soviet troops, who launched their counter-attack on December 6, 1941, wore uniforms and used equipment designed for winter conditions. Furthermore, many of them were fresh troops transferred by Stalin from Siberia. During the following 10 days, the Germans were driven back along the front, in some instances, for considerable distances.

Hitler was angered at these retreats, many of which had been sanctioned by the commander of the German army, Field-Marshal Walther von Brauchitsch. Hitler thereupon took personal command of the army and ordered it to stand fast and not on any account to retreat.

The German army, now forbidden to make tactical withdrawals, ended up losing a significant amount of equipment, which thereby compromised its future military actions. While the Germans eventually regained some of the ground lost, it was not until spring that they could advance again.

Hitler's assumption of command of the army was to be a significant factor in Germany's eventual defeat. By the early months of 1942, Hitler had lost the confidence of many ordinary troops by the decisions he was making as commander-in-chief.

Michael Jones provides copious details of the terrible German mistreatment of Soviet prisoners-of-war. It is noteworthy that he also provides evidence that many German troops were shocked at this mistreatment.

The great strength of this book is that it is based primarily upon eyewitness accounts of the conflict. These sometimes impede the flow of the narrative; but they do at least give the reader an invaluable insight into the perspectives of both the German and Soviet soldiers.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am