April 3rd 2010

  Buy Issue 2824

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: How toxic culture exploits our children

EDITORIAL: Stern Hu trial: implications for Australia

CANBERRA OBSERVED: PM Rudd kicks off a very long campaign on health

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: $16 billion education fiasco traps Julia Gillard

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Voters want equality for all mothers: Galaxy poll

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Rann hangs on after big anti-Labor swing

BORDER CONTROL: Rudd's time bomb on a boat: asylum-seekers

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Behind the US-China trade dispute

LEGAL AFFAIRS: Human rights legislation through the back door

EAST TIMOR: East Timor - the quiet revolution

SCHOOLS: New national English curriculum scores only C+

SCHOOL FUNDING: Governments should support parental choice

UNITED STATES: Is Obamacare destined to be a disaster?

UNITED NATIONS: UN feminist gab-fest gets up steam

Firemen hose down political correctness (letter)

Gigantic scam (letter)

Atheistic arrogance misplaced (letter)

Too tough on Tony Abbott? (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Turkey's 100,000 Armenians; Al-Qaeda nuclear threat to Britain; Can Christian organisations survive in a 'tolerant' age?

CINEMA: Hollywood perplexed by family values - The Blind Side, rated PG

BOOK REVIEW: ISLAM AT THE GATES: How Christendom Defeated the Ottoman Turks, by Diane Moczar


Books promotion page

Governments should support parental choice

by Kevin Donnelly

News Weekly, April 3, 2010
Why are parents voting with their feet and deserting government schools?

Based on the latest Australian Bureau of Statistics figures, released in mid-March, it is clear that during the past 10 years the number of students in Catholic and independent schools has surged, while government school enrolments have flat-lined.

In 1999, 70 per cent of students across Australia went to government schools - 10 years later the figure is 66 per cent.

Student numbers have grown by 230,300 since 1999, with non-government school students accounting for 89 per cent of the increase.

Non-government school critics, such as the Australian Education Union, argue that the reason enrolments keep growing is because Catholic and independent schools are wealthy and can afford better facilities and smaller classes.

Not true. The latest ABS figures show that the teacher-to-student ratio in government and non-government schools is about the same. At the secondary level, the ratio of students to staff in government schools is 12.3 students for every staff member; the figure for non-government schools is 11.7 students for every teacher.

Surveys show parents choose non-government schools because of stronger discipline, better academic results and the values that such schools enforce are what parents want.

It is also true that government schools receive more state and federal money per student than non-government schools. On average, government schools receive $12,639 per student while non-government schools only receive $6,607 (based on 2007-08 Australian Productivity Commission figures).

State school funding from government during the past five years has increased by 1.6 per cent a year, while government funding to non-government schools has decreased by 0.1 per cent a year.

One reason explaining why non-government schools are so successful is that they have the freedom and flexibility to set their own course and to best meet the needs of their communities.

Unlike government schools, which are locked into the government bureaucracy and are made to adopt a one-size-fits-all approach, Catholic and independent schools are autonomous.

The result? Non-government schools have the freedom to employ and reward the best staff and to get rid of dud teachers. Instead of student discipline policy being set by head office, as with state schools, non-government schools also have the freedom to deal quickly with disruptive students.

Look at literacy and numeracy tests at Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 and Year 12 results, and it is clear that non-government schools achieve the strongest results.

Critics argue that it is because non-government schools hand-pick their students and do not serve disadvantaged communities.

Again, not true. Catholic schools serve the same types of communities as government schools and have the same diverse student range; but Catholic schools still achieve stronger academic results and get more students into university.

Last year, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd argued that school choice was a good thing and that parents should vote with their feet if they were unhappy.

Education Minister Julia Gillard also praises non-government schools for the results they get and argues, regardless of school attended, that every student deserves proper funding.

Gillard has also said that the Government would review the way non-government schools were funded. Given that parents want school choice and non-government school enrolments are on the increase, one hopes that Gillard will guarantee that such schools will not be financially penalised for being so successful.

Dr Kevin Donnelly is director of the Education Standards Institute (www.edstandards.com.au). He taught for 18 years in Melbourne government and non-government schools. This article first appeared in the Brisbane Courier-Mail, March 17, 2010.

Purchase this book at the bookshop:


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am