April 3rd 2010

  Buy Issue 2824

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: How toxic culture exploits our children

EDITORIAL: Stern Hu trial: implications for Australia

CANBERRA OBSERVED: PM Rudd kicks off a very long campaign on health

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: $16 billion education fiasco traps Julia Gillard

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Voters want equality for all mothers: Galaxy poll

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Rann hangs on after big anti-Labor swing

BORDER CONTROL: Rudd's time bomb on a boat: asylum-seekers

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Behind the US-China trade dispute

LEGAL AFFAIRS: Human rights legislation through the back door

EAST TIMOR: East Timor - the quiet revolution

SCHOOLS: New national English curriculum scores only C+

SCHOOL FUNDING: Governments should support parental choice

UNITED STATES: Is Obamacare destined to be a disaster?

UNITED NATIONS: UN feminist gab-fest gets up steam

Firemen hose down political correctness (letter)

Gigantic scam (letter)

Atheistic arrogance misplaced (letter)

Too tough on Tony Abbott? (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Turkey's 100,000 Armenians; Al-Qaeda nuclear threat to Britain; Can Christian organisations survive in a 'tolerant' age?

CINEMA: Hollywood perplexed by family values - The Blind Side, rated PG

BOOK REVIEW: ISLAM AT THE GATES: How Christendom Defeated the Ottoman Turks, by Diane Moczar


Books promotion page

Stern Hu trial: implications for Australia

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, April 3, 2010
The Shanghai trial of Rio Tinto executive, Stern Hu, has important lessons for Australia.

Mr Hu, an Australian national born in China, was arrested nine months ago, along with three other Rio Tinto executives who are Chinese citizens. The four men were detained incommunicado for about six months on suspicion of espionage, before charges of bribery and stealing state secrets were laid against them.

Mr Hu was permitted only minimal contact with Australian consular staff, despite repeated attempts by the Australian Government to facilitate this. He was not permitted to be represented by an Australian lawyer, and the trial was conducted largely in secret.

When Rio Tinto executives, Australian officials and journalists attempted to get details of the charges, they were refused on the ground that the charges themselves were "state secrets".

As if this bizarre sequence of events were not enough, it is clear that the Beijing regime has written the laws, appointed the judges, prosecutors and defence lawyers, and stage-managed the trial.

The outcome was therefore pre-determined, as are trials of Chinese human rights activists, journalists and Falun Gong practitioners whose principled outspokenness in defence of civilised values has been brutally suppressed.

Those who worked alongside Stern Hu speak of him as a man of honesty and integrity, a person well versed in the Chinese legal system, as his parents were thrown into a labour camp for years during the Maoist era's Cultural Revolution, when he had to live with his grandparents.

In these circumstances, the reports that Mr Hu has pleaded guilty to the charges should be seen not as an admission of guilt, but as a damage-minimisation strategy in what is an elaborate charade, stage-managed by the communist regime, to punish Rio Tinto and perhaps Australia for some real or imagined slight.

There are numerous issues which brought down the ire of Beijing on Rio Tinto, and its Chinese employees are in the most vulnerable position.

One of these was the commercial success of Rio in price negotiations for the supply of iron ore to Chinese steel mills. Shortly before the global financial crisis, Stern Hu negotiated an increase in iron ore prices of almost 90 per cent in iron ore prices.

Another issue was the agreement between Rio and BHP-Billiton, the two largest iron ore producers in Western Australia, to share their production facilities and negotiate jointly with Chinese steel mills.

A third issue was the unsuccessful bid by the Chinese state-owned corporation, Chinalco, for a controlling stake in Rio, which failed in Australia, shortly before Stern Hu and his associates were arrested. Chinalco remains Rio's largest single shareholder, and is one of Rio's global business partners.

Another issue was the defection of a Chinese diplomat in Sydney a few years ago, despite Chinese attempts to force him to return to China.

Since the arrests, Rio Tinto executives, including CEO Tom Albanese, have been vigorously working to support the families of their arrested employees, as well as trying to placate the Beijing authorities in an effort to convince them that Rio Tinto is a partner, not a threat.

Within the past few weeks, Rio has announced a joint venture with Chinalco to develop a large iron-ore project in Guinea, and, as the trial took place, Mr Albanese was in Beijing to participate in the China Development Forum, a commitment which kept him in China while the trials took place.

All the signs are that Rio's efforts will succeed in mitigating the severity of the sentences handed down at the end of the Chinese show-trials. However, the vindictiveness of the prosecution of Rio's employees shows how brutally Beijing treats those whose actions conflict with the Chinese Communist Party's global ambitions.

In particular, it highlights the danger of allowing Chinese corporations, which are financial entities controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, from gaining control of strategic industries, as they are threatening to do through takeovers of major corporations in Australia.

Their capacity to take over foreign corporations is largely due to the massive trade surpluses accumulated by Chinese corporations which export to the West. This, in turn, is a result of the Chinese government's policy of maintaining an artificially under-valued currency, which permits Chinese manufactured goods to flood world markets.

As a relatively small economy, Australia is highly vulnerable to the takeover of its world-class mining industry by Beijing. Additionally, China will inevitably attempt to influence Australia's foreign policy, away from its Western allies and towards an accommodation with Beijing, as it has attempted in the United States through buying political influence.

As China grows as a global economic power, these attempts will certainly increase. The rise in Australia's national debt and its government debt - largely funded by foreign capital, particularly from China - puts Australia's very sovereignty at risk.

Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am