April 3rd 2010

  Buy Issue 2824

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: How toxic culture exploits our children

EDITORIAL: Stern Hu trial: implications for Australia

CANBERRA OBSERVED: PM Rudd kicks off a very long campaign on health

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: $16 billion education fiasco traps Julia Gillard

PAID PARENTAL LEAVE: Voters want equality for all mothers: Galaxy poll

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Rann hangs on after big anti-Labor swing

BORDER CONTROL: Rudd's time bomb on a boat: asylum-seekers

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Behind the US-China trade dispute

LEGAL AFFAIRS: Human rights legislation through the back door

EAST TIMOR: East Timor - the quiet revolution

SCHOOLS: New national English curriculum scores only C+

SCHOOL FUNDING: Governments should support parental choice

UNITED STATES: Is Obamacare destined to be a disaster?

UNITED NATIONS: UN feminist gab-fest gets up steam

Firemen hose down political correctness (letter)

Gigantic scam (letter)

Atheistic arrogance misplaced (letter)

Too tough on Tony Abbott? (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Turkey's 100,000 Armenians; Al-Qaeda nuclear threat to Britain; Can Christian organisations survive in a 'tolerant' age?

CINEMA: Hollywood perplexed by family values - The Blind Side, rated PG

BOOK REVIEW: ISLAM AT THE GATES: How Christendom Defeated the Ottoman Turks, by Diane Moczar


Books promotion page


News Weekly, April 3, 2010

America's bloodiest conflict

by John Keegan

(London: Hutchinson)
Hardback: 416 pages
ISBN: 9780091794835
Rec. price: AUD$69.95

Reviewed by Michael Daniel

Perhaps no other military conflict, apart from the two world wars, has inspired so many works of literature, film and television as the American Civil War.

Lasting almost four years from 1861 to 1865, the conflict resulted in the deaths of approximately 600,000 combatants, from war and disease, and redefined many aspects of American life. It saw not only the end of slavery but also the shift of the centre of gravity of the American economy from the agrarian South to the rapidly-industrialising North.

John Keegan, the well-known military historian and author of numerous monographs of various conflicts, analyses not only individual battles of the Civil War, but also the underlying strategic trends that ultimately led to the Northern victory. He also places the conflict in its historical-social context.

The American Civil War falls into three sections. The first explores American society before the war, the causes of the war, the geography of the war and a typical soldier's life. The geography of the South, where the bulk of the war was fought, largely determined why there evolved two theatres of war, one in the west and one in the east. Keegan also observes that, on the eve of battle, the United States standing army had only 16,000 troops, and the armies of both sides consisted essentially of poorly trained and untried troops.

The middle chapters detail the conduct of the war. Keegan organises his analysis chronologically and by theatres of conflict.

The final section of the book draws together the threads of many of the themes and ideas examined in this middle section. Keegan particularly examines issues such as leadership in the war and the question of whether the South had any likelihood of winning.

Central to Keegan's analysis is the thesis that the South was not in a position to win the war. To secure its independence, the South needed to resist the North long enough for the North to tire of the war and sue for peace. By contrast, the North's objective was simply to destroy the South's capacity to fight.

Not only did the North have more troops, it also had the industry that the South lacked. The South also lacked a navy, and this enabled the North to establish a blockade of the South's ports, known as the Anaconda plan, which lasted for the duration of the war and which became more effective as the war progressed.

The result was that the South was largely prevented from exporting cotton, its primary source of economic wealth, and was hindered from importing weapons and other items needed to fight the war. The blockade was also a principal cause of the hyperinflation that destroyed the South's economy.

Nevertheless, the Confederate army was comprised of soldiers loyal to the Southern cause and determined to fight to the end. Furthermore, it also had some outstanding leaders, particularly Generals "Stonewall" Jackson and Robert E. Lee. Ironically, the latter had been offered command of the Union Army at the commencement of the conflict, which he had declined because he refused to fight against his home state, Virginia.

On the Union side, by contrast, it took between 18 months to two years for commanders capable of leading the North to victory to rise to the fore. Early in the war, George B. McClellan - who became for a brief time general-in-chief of the Union Army - proved himself to be a capable organiser, but was essentially risk-adverse, missing key opportunities to press home the North's military advantages against Confederate forces.

President Lincoln eventually found the general he was looking for in Ulysses S. Grant, who led the Union forces to victory in the western theatre, particularly at Vicksburg. The result was that the North secured its control over the Mississippi River, thereby cutting the South in two. Although the western section of the US was sparsely populated, it provided significant quantities of meat for the Confederacy.

Early in 1864, Lincoln made Grant commander of all the Union forces. Unlike McClellan, Grant was prepared to take calculated risks. He was determined, despite the significant losses that his campaigns sustained, to maintain the pressure on the Confederate armies, eventually pinning them down in the long-running Siege of Petersburg, Virginia.

At the same time, General William T. Sherman led his army into the heart of the Confederacy, through Georgia and then into South Carolina. His troops destroyed supplies and infrastructure as they advanced, as part of a deliberate strategy to destroy the South's ability to continue waging war.

Confederate General Robert E. Lee evacuated his troops from Petersburg, which resulted in the Union's capture of Richmond, Virginia, the Confederate capital. Lee soon realised that it was impossible to continue the fight and surrendered his army at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, on April 9, 1865, the date designated by historians as the end of the American Civil War.

Keegan concludes by observing that the conflict had a profound impact on the American identity. Before the war, ordinary citizens had little affinity to the United States of America; afterwards, however, Americans developed a strong sense of nationhood.

It is true that the latter stages of the war saw the North engage in the calculated destruction of the South. However, according to Keegan, this did not produce irreconcilable divisions within the country. In 1913, at the 50th anniversary commemoration of the Battle of Gettysburg, elderly veterans of both sides of the conflict greeted each other affably.

Strange to say, despite its scale and bloodshed, the American Civil War had surprisingly little impact on military thinking in continental Europe.

However, the trench warfare and war of attrition that characterised the latter parts of the Civil War, particularly at the Siege of Petersburg, were a grim forerunner of the bloody stalemate of the Western Front in World War I.

As with his previous military studies, Keegan's The American Civil War is a thoroughly researched monograph. His account of this significant conflict is accessible, both to the student of history and to the general reader, and is highly recommended.

Purchase this book at the bookshop:


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am