September 19th 2009


  Buy Issue 2812
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: 'Level playing-field' crushes Australian farmers

MARRIAGE AND FAMILY: Back to basics in the marriage debate

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Assessing Rudd's stimulus package

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Rio Tinto, China and Australia's national interest

EDITORIAL: California wildfires caused by lack of hazard reduction

WATER: Water policy threatens Australia's food security

ILLICIT DRUGS: Kings Cross safe injecting rooms fail to reduce drug overdose deaths

QUEENSLAND: Bligh Government amends abortion laws

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Ireland follows Iceland in financial meltdown

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Japan's new PM rejects 'market fundamentalism'

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: The debasement of higher education

EDUCATION: Seeking a better deal for rural and regional students

OPINION: 1945 Allied repatriations a crime against humanity

NCC Fighting Fund appeal (letter)

Senator Ted Kennedy (letter)

Abortions are never justified (letter)

World War II (letter)

CINEMA: Revealing insight into Rebiya Kadeer - The 10 Conditions of Love

BOOK REVIEW: C.S. LEWIS IN A TIME OF WAR, by Justin Phillips

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

Abortions are never justified (letter)


by Damian Wyld

News Weekly, September 19, 2009
Sir,

With new chapters in the abortion saga opening up, I am pleased to see reports from Queensland.

I was troubled, though, to read Dr David van Gend's take on the issue ("GP protests: we are doctors, not baby-killers", News Weekly, September 5, 2009).

His comment that "[doctors] need legal scrutiny to keep them honest, to ensure any abortion they perform is morally and medically justified" poses a question: when is an abortion morally or medically justified? The answer is simple - never.

Dr van Gend's references to "criminal limits on abortion" and the risk of doctors degenerating "into mere commercial killers" similarly imply that some abortions are warranted.

When we are willing to admit that some abortions may be justified, we open a very dangerous door. All that remains is to debate the permissible circumstances.

The sanctity of life is absolute and while we may, at times, be compelled to political pragmatism, we must never practise moral pragmatism.

Damian Wyld,
SA State President,
National Civic Council,
Frewville, SA




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm