October 17th 2009

  Buy Issue 2814

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Mao's long shadow over China

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Mr Turnbull in a dilemma of his own making

VICTORIA: Partial backdown over Equal Opportunity Act

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Political lobby groups funded by your taxes

FOREIGN INVESTMENT: New foreign investment rules still fall short

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Immigration and Australia's economic future

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Why Ireland voted for the Lisbon Treaty

ENERGY: Nuclear power policy shift for Germany

WORLD WAR II: Odilo Globocnik, forgotten co-author of the Holocaust

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Abortion's dangers to health of future babies

OVERSEAS AID: Salesian missions to Philippines floods, Samoan tsunami

UNITED STATES: Message to America: learn to like taxes

OPINION: The Left's flawed concept of society

AS THE WORLD TURNS: China spells end of US dollar hegemony; Morality Hollywood-style; Australia's Frank Brennan SJ on same-sex marriage

CINEMA: Forgotten story of Victoria's early life - The Young Victoria (rated PG)

BOOK REVIEW: THE MARCH OF PATRIOTS: The Struggle for Modern Australia, by Paul Kelly

BOOK REVIEW: THE LOST SPY: An American in Stalin's Secret Service, by Andrew Meier

Books promotion page

Partial backdown over Equal Opportunity Act

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, October 17, 2009
Following a campaign involving thousands of submissions to Victoria's Brumby Labor Government, MPs and the media, the Victorian Government has decided to maintain the exemption for religious organisations where application of the Equal Opportunity Act would conflict with their religious beliefs.

An inquiry commissioned by the Government in 2007 to examine changes to the Act had recommended the removal of many exemptions for religious organisations, despite most submissions being against. The Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, which enforces the Act, strongly supported the removal of exemptions for religious organisations.

The outcome is a victory for common sense, and a recognition that religious organisations, which provide vital services to the community in a range of areas, including education, health care and care of the marginalised, should be able to function without compromising their beliefs.

In announcing the Government's decision, the Attorney-General, Rob Hulls, said that "in striking the balance between religious freedom and protection from discrimination, it was recognised that religious groups should be allowed to discriminate on some grounds if it was in accordance with their beliefs".

The proposed changes are not satisfactory, although they represent a backdown on what was originally proposed.

Religious and charitable organisations should have the freedom to determine how they will fulfil their roles in society, without government or bureaucratic interference.

In fact, the churches have shown themselves particularly sensitive to their social responsibilities, by offering employment, health care, education and assistance to the marginalised. The proposed laws do not arise from any perceived need, but rather, from a desire to exercise coercive social engineering.

Submissions to the inquiry into the Act showed how far religious organisations have complied with both the letter and the spirit of the Act, by extending their work far beyond those who conform to their religious beliefs.

In this respect, the Equal Opportunity Act reverses the onus of proof which in criminal matters rests with the prosecution: employers and organisations are required to prove to the Equal Opportunity Commission that they did not discriminate, rather than a complainant proving that they have.

Mr Hulls' statement makes clear that religious bodies will have to prove their case. He said, "In relation to employment, the religious nature of the organisation or school will need (to) be taken into account in determining whether a particular position needs to be filled by someone who adheres to that religion's beliefs."


Predictably, the government decision was trenchantly criticised by homosexual organisations and the Independent Education Union. Rodney Croome of the Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group said that "the right to employment and education is more important than pandering to religious prejudice".

The chairman of the Equal Opportunity Commission, Dr Helen Szoke, gave a lukewarm endorsement to the Government's decision. She said, "This does bring us closer to ensuring fairness and equality for all Victorians."

She said she was pleased the Government had toughened the law to ensure religious bodies had to demonstrate how employing someone of a particular religion is an "inherent requirement" of the job.

However, the leading education consultant, Kevin Donnelly, backed the protections given by the law to religious organisations.

He said: "Faith-based schools are not secular schools and, while they are an important part of the broader Victorian educational community, such schools have a unique mission to fulfil in terms of their religious teachings and principles.

"If a teacher's lifestyle or beliefs are in opposition to, or contradict, the religious beliefs and tenets of a particular faith-based school, then it is only reasonable that the school has the right to deny employment.

"The reason parents send their children to faith-based schools is because such schools provide an education and environment informed and guided by their religion. The right of parents to educate their children, or to have them educated according to their religious and moral beliefs and traditions, is safeguarded under several international agreements including: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the Convention against Discrimination in Education 1960, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

"To fulfil their obligations and mission, religious schools need the freedom to employ staff who embrace that particular religion and who follow its teachings, both in word and deed. As educational institutions, it is also important that individual school authorities are free to employ staff that are committed to and support the culture of a school and its educational philosophy."

Attention now turns to the exact terms of the proposed changes to the Equal Opportunity Act, which will be unveiled early next year.

In light of the opposition expressed over recent weeks, it is quite possible that further amendments will be made to the Act to erode religious freedom in Victoria.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am