October 3rd 2009

  Buy Issue 2813

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Government push for sell-off of Telstra's infrastructure

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Union warning on China free trade agreement

EDITORIAL: Re-opening the case of the Balibo Five

WAR ON TERROR: The deadly peril still very much in our midst

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Misguided move for women in combat roles

ECONOMY: Development bank now urgently needed

TASMANIA: Can the Apple Isle become Australia's food bowl

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Policy-makers still refusing to face reality

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Rudd Government ignores abortion link to maternal deaths

POPULATION: Solving the world food problem

The man who fed the developing world

OPINION: No apology after latest outburst from PM Rudd

Deplorable standards (letter)

Melting pot (letter)

Safer nuclear energy option (letter)

Obama changes tune on troops (letter)

CINEMA: Award-winning film about slain journalists - Balibo (rated M)

CINEMA: Deliver us from this left-liberal 'moralising' - The Soloist (rated M)

BOOK REVIEW: THE PLAN: Twelve Months to Renew Britain, by Douglas Carswell and Daniel Hannan

BOOK REVIEW: INSIDE THE STALIN ARCHIVES: Discovering the New Russia, by Jonathan Brent

Books promotion page

Government push for sell-off of Telstra's infrastructure

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, October 3, 2009
The Federal Government announcement that it wants the voluntary separation of Telstra's infrastructure from its retail operations will bring to an end many years of recriminations in the telecommunications industry, and inaugurate an era in which the focus is on improved services for users, rather than on profits.

The announcement was part of the Government's plan to set up a company to build and run the next generation national broadband network. Proposals to have this network run by the private sector were abandoned last April.

The "voluntary and co-operative" separation will allow Telstra to sell off its infrastructure. Its shareholders will therefore not lose out, and the sale will not constitute "nationalisation" of the industry.

The most obvious conflict in the present system is between Telstra, as provider of the infrastructure, and its retail competitors in the mobile phone and internet businesses who have long complained that Telstra has imposed excessive fees for access to its mobile phone and copper-wire networks, pushing up prices for all communications and inflating its profits.

Rural and regional

Equally importantly, Telstra has been unco-operative in meeting the universal service obligation (USO), which was supposed to ensure that users in rural and regional Australia had access to services comparable to those supplied to people living in the capital cities, and has pushed shareholder profits ahead of its national interest obligations.

For example, during the Howard Government's term in office, Telstra blamed inadequate funding for the failure to deliver adequate services in rural and regional Australia.

In a submission to the USO Review in 2007, Telstra - then run by the "Three Amigos" from the United States, led by Sol Trujillo - blamed the former government for the failure to provide reliable mobile phone and internet services in rural Australia, claiming that "the true cost of the USO has never been adequately determined or recognised", despite the efforts of the Government to obtain independent advice on the cost of providing these services.

Although Telstra itself owned the copper-wire network and exchanges which provide the foundation of the service, it did not offer its own costing of the USO, but instead insisted that the cost determined by the industry regulator "bears no real relationship to the true cost of USO delivery". (Telstra submission, p.26).

Telstra's take-no-prisoners approach to restricting access to its infrastructure was shown in its attempt to deny access to its infrastructure to Optus, its main competitor, in areas where Optus had its own cable network.

The cable network was established to provide Pay TV services. It can be used for telecommunications, but relies on linking into the Telstra-owned telephone exchanges and copper-wire network.

In announcing what he called "fundamental reforms" to the regulation of telecommunications in Australia, the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, said that the Federal Government wanted Telstra to voluntarily separate its infrastructure assets, including copper wire, cable, and mobile phone towers, from its retail arms (including telephone sales, service and installation, broadband, Pay TV and directories).

He said Telstra was one of the most vertically-integrated telecommunications companies in the country, and its structure encouraged anti-competitive conduct.

If Telstra decides not to structurally separate, he said the Government would "impose a strong functional separation framework on Telstra" by requiring Telstra to conduct its network operations and wholesale function "at arm's length from the rest of Telstra", to provide equivalent price services to its retail telecommunications competitors.

Further, it will be prevented from acquiring additional spectrum for wireless broadband, the fastest growing section of the market.

The voluntary separation which the Government wants Telstra to adopt could still leave its telecommunications infrastructure in private hands, unless the Government intervenes.

Wasteful duplication

To prevent wasteful duplication, as has already happened with cable TV, fibre-optic communications cables and mobile phone towers, there is a strong case to have the infrastructure provided by a government utility, as existed before the privatisation of Australia's telecommunications industry.

It is clear that this is what Minister Conroy intends to achieve through the company being set up to establish a national broadband network.

The Government clearly wants this company to purchase Telstra's infrastructure, as an integral component of its future telecommunications system, and then make these facilities available to all telecommunications retailers on the basis of equality. The Federal Government will commit up to $43 billion over the next eight years to build and operate the network.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am