November 28th 2009


  Buy Issue 2817
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: Are we about to create another Stolen Generation?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: National sorrow over plight of forgotten Australians

EDITORIAL: ETS: Rudd's one-way ticket to hell

POLITICS: Whither the Liberal Party?

COVER STORY: Brian Mullins (1925-2009): a true Australian hero

CANBERRA OBSERVED: National sorrow over plight of forgotten Australians

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: Are we about to create another Stolen Generation?

FINANCIAL CRISIS: Splitting the megabanks for financial stability

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Afghanistan: Obama's no-win rhetoric

WAR ON TERROR: Grim lessons of the Fort Hood massacre

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Rudd's 'Indonesia solution' has been in place since 2007

HEALTH CARE: Labor unleashes class war on doctors

NEW ZEALAND: John Key sells New Zealand short

COLD WAR: The year the Berlin Wall fell

UNITED STATES: Obamacare: the ego has landed

ABORTION: An abortion-provider changes her mind

Statesmanship needed (letter)

American health cover (letter)

Some orphanage carers were admirable (letter)

BOOK REVIEW: THE VOCATION OF BUSINESS: Social Justice in the Marketplace, by John C. M├ędaille

BOOK REVIEW: THE THIRTY-SIX: A story of a boy's miraculous survival in wartime Poland, by Siegmund Siegreich

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

HEALTH CARE:
Labor unleashes class war on doctors


by Jeffry Babb

News Weekly, November 28, 2009
Australian politics is less class-based than it was even 50 years ago. After all, when many workers are earning $1,000 a week, it's pretty difficult to get them to man the barricades in the class war.

But some things never change in Labor's ideology, and among them is Labor's antipathy to the medical profession. It doesn't matter how you cut it; it's the old class war on the doctors.

Australia's health system isn't perfect; it's just that it's a lot better than most other places in the world. Much is made of the shortage of doctors in rural and regional areas, but most of this can be put down to lack of manpower (and increasingly, woman power) and lack of incentives. The shortage of personnel is likely to be remedied as a new wave of medical students hits the market.

The main thrust of Labor's policy, however, is to turn the medical profession from a service based on independent professionals to a salaried, government-controlled bureaucracy.

Patient allocation

Health Minister Nicola Roxon's latest proposal that patients be allocated to doctors on a list basis is straight out of the playbook of Britain's National Health Service.

Let's think about this from the patient's point of view. Some doctors are better than others, the same as some plumbers are better than others. The reason may be a better bedside manner, it may be they are more competent, it may be just that there is a simple personality clash – it may just be that, at times, the patient wants a second opinion. Or it might be that the patient has a potentially embarrassing problem that he or she does not want to discuss with his or her regular general practitioner.

Some people who are ill-suited to their career choice are always going to slip through the system. In other words, if you are allocated a doctor you don't like or who is a dud, you are likely to be stuck with him. Of course, the government will make some noises about "freedom of choice"; but in the end, a doctor who hangs up his shingle and succeeds or fails according to the quality of service he offers is going to provide a better quality of service than a public employee.

Now, all doctors, including general practitioners, must be members of the appropriate professional body, which accredits them as qualified practitioners. This means they must first finish medical school and then qualify as surgeons, physicians, ophthalmologists or psychiatrists.

This postgraduate training is arduous and expensive, and practitioners naturally expect a return on their investment of time, energy and money - the average medical graduate is left with tens of thousands of dollars in university fees.

Much is made of the top professionals who make millions, but the average GP is running a practice that gives him a barely adequate return on his investment in professional development. Indeed, many GPs complain they are virtually government employees relying on Medicare to pay their bills, but the "virtually" is important. They remain independent professionals who succeed or fail according to the service they provide.

The recent moves to widen the scope of nurse practitioners concerns many GPs. While nurse practitioners may have a role in isolated areas, a nurse is not a substitute for a general practitioner, who has years of undergraduate and postgraduate training in family medicine. Expanding the role of nurse practitioners may simply be an axe to wield again the ancient enemy, the family GP. Many nurses have specialist training, which makes them indispensable in the medical system; but a nurse is not a substitute for professionally-trained general practitioners with years more education behind them.

Minister Roxon's move to cut Medicare payments for cataract surgery again flies in the face of reality. On the face of it, it may seem plausible - better technology equals cheaper prices.

If the Fred Hollows Foundation can do cataract surgery for $25, why can't an Australian ophthalmologist? The reason is that an Australian eye-doctor is running a practice. He has to pay a receptionist, an accountant, rent for his rooms and so on - in other words, he has fixed costs, which means the money goes into a lot of pockets apart from his own. In fact, he can't absorb the cost cuts that the government is asking him to accept.

Conscription

Labor health policy is just the class war by another name. The government should offer doctors better incentives, not conscript them onto the public payroll.

Independent professionals are better for patients and better for the economy. Managing demand is a key policy driver for any health care system.

The Labour Government in Britain has shown that throwing money at their government-run National Health Service has simply enriched doctors. A healthy private medical sector is sensible both for patients and practitioners. A private health care system preserves choice and makes economic sense.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm