June 27th 2009

  Buy Issue 2806

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Peter Costello calls it a day

EDITORIAL: New South Wales puts Australian firms first

VICTORIA: The threats to Victoria's electricity and water

GENERAL MOTORS: Restructured GM won't thrive without new mindset

UNITED STATES I: Obama's celebrity-style media spectacle

UNITED STATES II: Cairo speech impressed Western media, not Islamic world

IRAN: US conciliatory approach to Tehran backfires

ASIA/PACIFIC REGION: East Timor consolidates stable democratic government

UNITED STATES: Husband and wife spied for communist Cuba

SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY: How science can diminish humanity

EUTHANASIA: The perils of euthanasia "with safeguards"

MEN AND IDEAS: Bob Santamaria's role in Australia's culture wars

OPINION: The Japanese threat facing Australia in 1942

Failure of stimulus packages (letter)

Russia's population crisis (letter)

IPCC's political agenda (letter)

MEDIA: ABC Chaser's war on common decency

CINEMA: Hollywood morality for an audience of fools - State of Play

BOOKS: SHAKESPEARE'S SHATTERED YOUTH: Laming or Elixir? by Lucy Sullivan

BOOKS: CROSSING HITLER: The Man Who Put the Nazis on the Witness Stand, by Benjamin C. Hett

Books promotion page

New South Wales puts Australian firms first

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, June 27, 2009
Anytime that anyone dares to support a buy-Australia policy, a group of economic purists can be depended upon to condemn it.

For the first time since the 1960s, an Australian government has announced a policy which gives preference to Australian industry.

The NSW state Treasurer, Eric Roosendaal, said his government's new purchasing policy, called Local Jobs First, would give preferred treatment to local businesses which supply state government agencies and state-owned corporations (SOCs). Every year, they buy nearly $4 billion in goods and services from the private sector.

Under Local Jobs First, government agencies and SOCs will now be required to give preferential treatment to local manufacturers under a price preference mechanism.

The price preference means locally-made content is discounted by 20 per cent when compared to overseas-sourced material in tender evaluations. Goods produced in rural and regional areas will attract a further 5 per cent discount.


Every time anyone in Australia supports a buy-Australia policy, free market purists in Treasury, various think-tanks and the political parties denounce it as "protectionism" and repeat the mantra that this is a repeat of the Smoot-Hawley Act, a notorious piece of American legislation in 1930 which imposed savage tariffs on a large range of imports, prompting retaliatory action from many European nations and bringing global trade to a virtual standstill.

In fact, the new policy announced in New South Wales is long overdue and sensible.

Preferential trade deals have been a feature of the policies of both the United States and the European Union for many decades. Even the Australia-US free trade agreement, which was supposed to open the door to free trade between the two countries, contained hundreds of exemptions - mainly for American industries.

US farmers have been the beneficiaries of multi-billion dollar subsidies for many decades, and the EU's Common Agricultural Policy was designed to subsidise small-scale farmers, both to protect the rural communities on which European societies have been built, and to equalise the economic opportunities between city and country.

Other nations have different measures to assist domestic manufacturers and businesses. Some, like China, have used their control over the local currency, cheap labour costs and a lack of occupational health and safety laws to keep exports cheap.

During the American Presidential election campaign last year, Barack Obama promised that he would abandon the free trade mantra of the Republican Party, and would support American industry and protect American jobs. It was one of the defining issues of the campaign.

Last December, Obama announced a $US787 billion economic stimulus package which contained provisions which will further promote American industry and protect American jobs - $US54 billion in small business concessions, tax relief for families, and massive expansion of both the housing and building industries. The package was adopted by Congress last February. (This was in addition to the $US700 billion previously committed by the Bush Administration to rescue the American economy in 2007 and 2008.)

The policies of the past two years, including the Republicans' bail-out of American banks and financial houses, and the Democrats' support for two of America's auto industry giants, are simply a continuation of long-standing policies adopted by successive US administrations over many years.

These measures have not attracted retaliatory action - for the simple reason that they are permitted under international trade rules. In any case, during the current economic emergency, the alternative policy of inaction would have led to an economic meltdown of unprecedented severity, whose main victims would be low-income families. Additionally, governments throughout the developed world have taken similar measures to protect their financial systems and manufacturing industries from collapse.

Australia - alone among the nations of the industrialised world - has abandoned both its manufacturing industries and agriculture in pursuit of free-market economic theory, which has crippled our primary and secondary industries.

This theory, most closely associated with what is known as the Chicago School, has dominated the teaching of economics since the 1960s, and populated the senior levels of Australian government, bureaucracy, the finance industry and think-tanks with people who seem to have learned nothing from what has happened in the world since the 1960s.

It was one of the 20th century's greatest economists, John Maynard Keynes, who during the Great Depression - which was triggered by a speculative bubble similar to that seen recently - observed that "practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist".

It was therefore not surprising that the modest actions announced by the New South Wales Treasurer last week should have aroused such strong and unwarranted condemnation.

- Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am