June 13th 2009

  Buy Issue 2805

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Beijing mocks Universal Declaration of Human Rights

EDITORIAL: Recession: end of the beginning ... or beginning of the end?

EUTHANASIA: Dr Death's travelling road show

POPULATION: Billionaire club seeks to curb world's population

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Is Barnaby Joyce a leader in the making?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Why Rudd's emissions trading scheme should be defeated

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Fundamental change is needed, but probably won't happen

GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR: FBI foils new terrorist attack on New York

SRI LANKA: Mass carnage of Tamils in war without witnesses

INDIA: India's Congress alliance's strengthened mandate

CHINA: Growth slump worries Beijing leadership

ASIA-PACIFIC REGION: Japan set to expand its naval capabilities

OBITUARY: Jerzy Zubrzycki MBE CBE AO - A champion of human freedom and dignity

OPINION: Employee share ownership under threat

AS THE WORLD TURNS: The word is out/ Sharia law vs. prairie law

Housing affordability and land prices (letter)

Religious zeal (letter)

Fuddled logic (letter)

Contrarianism? (letter)

CINEMA: 'The Baader Meinhof Complex' - film whitewashes notorious terrorist gang

BOOKS: I AM MELBA: A Biography, by Ann Blainey

BOOKS: AN AWKWARD TRUTH: The Bombing of Darwin, February 1942, by Peter Grose

Books promotion page

'The Baader Meinhof Complex' - film whitewashes notorious terrorist gang

News Weekly, June 13, 2009
Len Phillips reviews the new German film, The Baader Meinhof Complex (rated MA 15+, with English subtitles).

Let us begin with a quiz. The Baader-Meinhof Gang was a terrorist group that, during the 1960s and 1970s, blew up buildings across West Germany causing many deaths. They assassinated politicians, judges and, famously, the head of the German Employers Federation. They poisoned political life, and this in a country that was divided into its free democratic half on one side of the Iron Curtain and a totalitarian Communist state on the other.

Now a film about these people has just been released under the title, The Baader Meinhof Complex.

So my questions are these: will a film about terrorists support the terrorists or oppose them? Will the film denounce these people as a bunch of lunatic psychopathic killers, or will it find every excuse under the sun for what they did? Will their final eradication be seen as a blessing or instead as yet more evidence of the existence of a repressive state? Are their actions seen as important early steps on the road to eventual revolution?

Don't be silly. Do you really need me to tell you the answers? It's a movie, for goodness' sake. It's a product of the "arts" community. It's been put together by the same kind of fools who joined and supported Baader-Meinhof in the first place, and is made to appeal to the fascist totalitarian mindset of many on the modern left.

You'll recall there was a war in Vietnam to stop the Communists from the North from taking over the infinitely more free and prosperous peoples of the South. Since the North's victory in 1975 we have seen exactly what kind of government the Communists imposed, so nobody can plead ignorance on that score. It should now be a matter of personal recrimination and soul-searching for any '60s radical who opposed the defence of South Vietnam to have been complicit in handing that benighted country over to the murderous Viet Cong.

It is the same again with the despised Shah of Iran, who also makes a cameo appearance in the film. He was a typical repressive monarch found everywhere in the Middle East, although in many ways better than most. But since his fall from power in 1979, he has been replaced by the ayatollahs. Does anyone seriously see this as progress? Are the Iranian people better off? Is the world a safer place?

Yet, despite what we know today, the film-makers' sympathies lie entirely with the Baader-Meinhof Gang. Their depiction of the terrorists and the German state as just two morally equivalent sides of the same totalitarian coin is quite sickening.

Take what I think is a not untypical reaction to the film, this from David Stratton on ABC television's At the Movies:

"The increasingly hysterical atmosphere, the hatred the radicals have for right-wing newspaper baron Axel Springer and the ruthlessness with which both sides prosecute their beliefs is riveting stuff. As the leaders of the movement are jailed or killed, a new generation takes over."

Let me just for a moment dwell on "the ruthlessness with which both sides prosecute their beliefs is riveting stuff". Just exactly what beliefs are the civil authorities of the German state seen to be prosecuting?

They are that the free press and open debate must be defended; that people should be allowed to go about their business without being blown up by terrorists; and that murdering judges and elected politicians is not to be tolerated.

To react to this enforcement of the rule of law as if the German government in the 1960s and '70s represented a return of the Nazis, and as if violent protest were the only means to resist an encroaching authoritarian nightmare, is the complete opposite of the truth.

The Baader-Meinhof Gang were the Nazis. They were the brownshirts. They were the ones trying to impose a totalitarian state. That the German government took the steps it did to close down their operations can only be applauded.

But I have to agree with David Stratton's dictum: "As the leaders of the movement are jailed or killed, a new generation takes over."

This was easily the most disturbing aspect of the film and perhaps the most accurate. Early on, Baader-Meinhof and their crew are sent to Jordan for terrorist training with the Palestinians, and from then on the Palestinian war on Israel remains an important theme. The massacre at the 1972 Munich Summer Olympics of 11 Israeli athletes and a West German police officer, for example, is shown as one of the events of the moment.

The concluding scene of the film is a tableau of a new generation of German terrorists who speak wistfully about the future. As the camera pans towards the closed-up shutters that hide that future from us, we very faintly hear a Middle Eastern melody coming from outside.

The unmistakable point is that the torch lit by Baader-Meinhof would be handed on to the likes of al Qaeda.

And if you think that there is any sense of impending dread in that brief moment, you don't know very much at all about the movie industry and the audiences it attracts.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am