February 21st 2009

  Buy Issue 2797

Articles from this issue:

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Can Rudd save Australia from the global slump?

CULTURE: The other side of the ledger

OBITUARY: Fred Schwarz, Cold Warrior, friend of Ronald Reagan

UNITED STATES: Supreme Court contributed to global financial crisis

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Parenting not something to outsource / Diversity fanatics threaten charities

Anti-rural campaign (letter)

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Coalition differences over Rudd stimulus

Deregulation of wheat (letter)

LABOUR AND JUSTICE: The worker in Catholic social teaching, by Gavan Duffy

NATIONAL SECURITY: Secret Saudi funding of Australian institutions

ENERGY: How Australia can become fuel self-sufficient

TERRORISM: The two faces of Eve - nature, nurture or Islam?

EDUCATION: Non-government schools give parents better value

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Obstacles on the road to economic recovery

Bushfires blamed on global warming (letter)


Valuable contributions (letter)

CINEMA: The Wrestler grapples with life's big problems

CHINA: Chinese unrest in face of massive job losses

EDITORIAL: Bushfires: when will we ever learn?

Books promotion page

Bushfires: when will we ever learn?

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, February 21, 2009
After the devastating 2003 bush fires in NSW, the ACT and Victoria, a COAG inquiry steadfastly ignored recommendations that fuel-reduction burning could greatly reduce the risk of bushfires.

About five years ago, after an earlier disastrous bushfire season in New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT, News Weekly carried an editorial headed, "Bushfires: why the nightmare will be repeated" (November 1, 2003).

It drew attention to the fact that, although people with extensive experience in forest management had called for a regular program of fuel-reduction burn-offs, these had not been carried out, and, as a result, bushfires exploded into wildfires, causing extensive loss of life and property.

Studies conducted in Western Australia have shown that regular burn-offs of 10-15 per cent of forests reduce the amount of forest litter to a level where bushfires can be controlled, and do not develop into wildfires. Western Australia is acknowledged to have the most effective bushfire management program in Australia.

Although record temperatures and high winds were factors, the horrific bushfires in Victoria were a tragic commentary on the failure of forest management.

The response of many was predictable: global warming was widely blamed by Federal Government spokesmen and Victoria's Emergency Services commissioner for the unprecedented temperatures faced on February 7 - ignoring the fact that extremes of heat and drought are a recurrent feature of the Australian landscape, and have been since temperature records have been kept.

Recurring feature

As one of Australia's leading historians, Geoffrey Blainey observed, they have been a recurring feature of the Australian landscape since Black Thursday in February 1851 when, he said, "half of Victoria seemed to be on fire". (Herald Sun, Melbourne, February 9, 2009).

Compared with Black Friday, January 13, 1939, when around two million hectares were burned, the recent fires were far more limited. What made them more terrible than the bushfires of 1939, 1983, 2002 or 2003, is that they occurred in relatively populated areas, and took many more human lives.

A central cause of this is the growth of population in the near-metropolitan areas, often in heavy bushland.

Bernard Salt wrote recently: "Like other Australians, Melburnians are predisposed to what is known as the 'treechange' lifestyle.... Treechange is a growing lifestyle segment beyond the edges of many large cities. But nowhere across the continent are there as many people living this treechange lifestyle as there are around and beyond Melbourne's edges." (Herald Sun, February 10, 2009).

He showed that the number of treechangers had grown 50 per cent between 2001 and 2006.

Victorian Labor Premier John Brumby announced a royal commission into the Victorian bushfires, and promised that every issue will be on the table.

We have, however, been down this road before. After the 2003 bushfires in NSW, the ACT and Victoria caused many deaths and widespread destruction, a National Inquiry into Bushfire Mitigation and Management was conducted.

It stated, "Strategically planned and effectively implemented fuel reduction, usually but not only by burning, is the primary means of risk reduction", and added, "fuel-reduction burning is the most common and most efficient method of fuel reduction for larger areas of the landscape." (p.99).

By the time the national inquiry's report had been considered by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG), all references to fuel reduction had been removed.

This was no accident. In New South Wales, the government departments responsible for management of state forests and national parks are the National Parks Service and State Forests. In Victoria, it is the Department of Sustainability and Environment.

In each case, the departments have adopted the view that their role is one of fauna and flora conservation, rather than bushfire management.

A NSW MP, Peter Webb, stated that in the Brindabella and Kosciuszko national parks before the 2003 fires, "Only 0.3% or 2,164 ha in 2002 and even less in 2001, 0.2% or just 1,395 ha out of a massive area of 674,373 ha has been hazard-reduced. In Brindabella [National Park], no hazard reduction whatsoever was carried out in the last two years." (January 17, 2003).

The web site of Victoria's Department of Sustainability and Environment states that, since last July, burn-offs have occurred in only 10,700 ha out of about 8 million ha under the department's control, representing less than 0.1 per cent of the total area.

Numerous experts, including Phil Cheney, former head of the CSIRO's Bushfire Research Unit, Ron Coffey from the Forest Protection Association, and David Packham from Monash University, have called for a change of policy.

David Packham, who has had 50 years' experience in forest management and predicted the recent disaster, said, "The political decision has been to do nothing that will change the extreme threat to which our forests and rural lands are exposed."

The challenge now is to reverse that policy - or Victoria's inferno will be repeated.

- Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am