August 22nd 2009


  Buy Issue 2810
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Terrorism comes to Sydney

EDITORIAL: Is the financial crisis receding?

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: Heavy-handed China shows its true colours

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Rudd Government bid to take over hospitals

QUEENSLAND: Anna Bligh's Labor Government on the skids

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Regional consultation needed on new Murray-Darling plan

RURAL AFFAIRS: Dairy and irrigation industries hit hard

ENVIRONMENT: Analysis of alarmism: ocean acidification

CLIMATE: Climate change devastation: apocalypse now

HUMAN RIGHTS: Grievance industry shows exponential growth

OPINION: How Australian authors fare in the free market

GOVERNMENT: Public service independence undermined by politicians

OPINION: Forced repatriations from Austria in 1945

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Teenagers rescued from suicide training camps; Demographic time-bomb transforming Europe; Shocking decline of British schools; Bismarck on politics

CINEMA: Portrait of the starship captain as a young hoon - Star Trek

BOOK REVIEW: BATTLELINES, by Tony Abbott

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS:
Regional consultation needed on new Murray-Darling plan


by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, August 22, 2009
The Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) is to produce a draft water reallocation plan for the basin, but on what science will it be based and how closely will communities be consulted?

The draft plan on water reallocation is to be ready next year. If it is to strike an acceptable balance between the environment and socio-economic issues, it will require close, detailed and extensive consultations with farmers and communities on the complex land-riverine health issues across this huge tract of Australia. The basin produces 40 per cent of the nation's food.

Such a process is needed to replace the "token" consultations that have characterised the National Water Initiative process since the 1990s.

The release of The Basin Plan: A Concept Statement by the MDBA raises serious questions as to whether this will happen.

The Basin Plan says that the MDBA will produce "a range of informative materials to promote understanding of, and input to, the basin plan".

But how are communities to really understand this information and the background technical studies that underpin it, unless they are given the chance to hear detailed presentations and be able to form balanced opinions and positions?

The thrust of The Basin Plan seems to be that formal consultation will begin only after the draft plan is released. This is much too late. Regional communities need robust face-to-face discussion on the wide range of studies that will underpin the plan.

Of further concern, it appears that consideration of the huge socio-economic impacts that water reallocation will have on communities will not be central, but be just an "add-on", to the main basin plan. It will involve "a report to the [Murray-Darling] Ministerial Council" along with the proposed basin plan.

This is hardly consistent with the oft-quoted "triple bottom-line" approach to integrated water resources management, nor with the National Water Initiative's stated concern for openness, transparency and "balanced" water management decisions.

The MDBA needs structured consultations with regional communities.

First, the CSIRO has modelled scenarios for the whole Murray-Darling Basin that consider a range of climate change options and subsequent impacts on water yields, with the aim of estimating what are called "sustainable yield" estimates for each valley in the basin.

Although CSIRO has conducted a number of briefings on its work, the studies should be subjected to both the usual internal peer-review process and a very "public" peer-review process, so that all concerned groups throughout the basin can be comfortable that all the variables in the process have been properly considered.

Farmers and communities in the basin need to be briefed on the conclusions of this process.

Indeed, communities should have the opportunity to ensure that some independent experts review the "sustainable yield" estimates. Such evaluation of the science is critical to getting the most balanced result. Just a 5 per cent error in this work could mean an extra 500,000 megalitres is taken out of productive use, over and above whatever is decided as the basic re-allocation amount.

Second, the MDBA plans to start basin-wide water-planning studies, and the new Basin Advisory Committee will be the main avenue for consultations.

Consultation on the planning project needs to occur from the early stages. As position papers are likely to be produced by the planners - say, on water assessments, identification and evaluation of key environmental assets and socio-economic issues - these should all follow a structured consultation process.

Unless farmers and communities can discuss and be assured that all the contributing parts to the basin plan are fair, just and technically robust, then how can they sensibly provide appropriate input to the final basin plan?

Communities will need to be able to thoroughly analyse and critique the plan in order to assess the socio-economic impacts of the loss or movement of water from their region.

They need to see how proposed environmental improvements are assessed and justified, and how such adverse impacts can be mitigated; how local communities can adjust their economies to whatever might be the best balanced result.

Vulnerable

These regions are now vulnerable. Taking just 10 to 15 per cent of water from what is predominantly an irrigation region will cause severe economic and social disruption. Such regions cannot simply be left to re-adjust according to some mythical, market-driven economic rebalancing.

State governments will inherit very big structural adjustment problems and are unlikely to have any great willingness to solve them.

Broad consultation is needed from the start, not just when the draft plan is completed. Regional communities need to fully understand the issues so they can contribute to a plan that balances the environment with the socio-economic needs of their communities.

Patrick J. Byrne is national vice-president of the National Civic Council.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm