August 8th 2009


  Buy Issue 2809
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Economic bounce masks deep structural crisis

ENERGY: What can Australia do when the fuel runs out?

EDITORIAL: Overseas lesson in energy conservation

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Turnbull's judgement under a cloud

SCHOOLS: The choice so few parents can afford to make

MARRIAGE: The personal and social costs of cohabitation

OPINION: Keeping marriage between a man and a woman

CHINA: Cracks appear in China's detested one-child policy

POLITICAL IDEAS: Distributist responses to the global economic crisis

WAR ON TERROR: What will we learn from the Jakarta bombings?

EUROPE: Obama told: don't abandon central and eastern Europe

OBITUARY: Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski dies at 81

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Protest at News Weekly article on East Timor

Tony Abbott on divorce (letter)

Time for a people's bank? (letter)

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Genderless child-rearing experiment / Hostility towards masculinity / Dear baby-boomers ... / Shopkeepers honoured

BOOK REVIEW: POMPEII: The Life of a Roman Town, by Mary Beard

Books promotion page

FONT SIZE:

Time for a people's bank? (letter)


by Selwyn Johnston

News Weekly, August 8, 2009
Sir,

In early July, a group of Australian economists published a proposal for the establishment of an Australian "peoples bank" (News Weekly, July 25, 2009). This proposal deserves both consideration and publicity, but unfortunately Canberra barely acknowledged it.

The proposal, however, did serve to remind the public that there was a time in Australia's history when we did have our own people's bank. In 1912, the Fisher Labour Government founded the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, including its own savings bank. The bank was brilliantly successful by funding Australia through World War I and financing the trans-national railway line to Perth, to mention just two of the major projects of that time. Not only was this Commonwealth Bank a people's bank, it was also a "bankers bank", acting as the reserve bank, which was also in control of the supply of Australia's currency.

Clearly, this success was detrimental to the profits of the already established "foreign" banks and, following Labour's loss of control of the Senate, the power of the Commonwealth Bank was promptly negated by moving from management by a "governor" to a board, which was clearly "manipulable". Consequently, the "foreign" banks quickly regained control of Australia's finances, and by the late 1920s it was all over.

There was a later attempt by then Prime Minister Ben Chifley to regain control of the banking system in Australia when his government passed the Commonwealth Banking Act 1945 and the accompanying Currency Act 1945. However, Chifley lost power in 1949 and both acts were repealed.

Given the 1929 "depression" and the present "recession", the question remains: can we afford to continue with our present "unregulated" Western-styled banking system?

The concept of a people's bank should again be seriously considered, and not brushed aside.

Selwyn Johnston,
Gordonvale,
Far North Qld




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

EDITORIAL The future of Senator Cory Bernardi

EDITORIAL Trump installed but the left refuses to accept it

COVER STORY Company tax proposal just made for Trump

EDITORIAL Nothing new among Trump's executive orders

EUTHANASIA Quebec, Dutch, Belgian and Oregon laws a 'mess'

QUEENSLAND Pro-life Brisbane marches as abortion vote nears

COVER STORY Free-trade policy sending manufacturing into free-fall



News and views from around the world



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm