November 22nd 2008


  Buy Issue 2793
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: How Barack Obama won

CANBERRA OBSERVED: How long will Malcolm Turnbull last?

NATIONAL SECURITY: Executed Bali bombers hailed as martyrs

HUMAN RIGHTS: Beijing's butcher is granted Australian visa

ENVIRONMENT: Arctic melting: don't spoil a good story with the facts

FINANCIAL MARKETS: Regulatory proposals being put to Obama

OPINION: The West's long-running economic malaise

HEALTH CARE: Australian medicine's middle way

AUSTRALIAN POLITICS: A successful conservative party ready to rebuild

RULE OF LAW: The perils of a politicised judiciary

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Assessing the Australian Christian Lobby

POPULATION: The economic consequences of abortion

MEDIA: The facts behind the 1949 coal strike

AS THE WORLD TURNS: Toxic melamine in the food chain in China / African-Americans from victimhood to responsibility

Abandoning the old and sick (letter)

Institutional corruption in our schools (letter)

Absurd expectations about Obama (letter)

BOOKS: THE FAMILY: Power, Politics and Fundamentalism's Shadow Elite, by Jeff Sharlet

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS:
Assessing the Australian Christian Lobby


by Damian Wyld

News Weekly, November 22, 2008
Some of the ACL's recent activities have given cause for concern among pro-life, pro-family and faith-based activists, writes Damian Wyld.

Since its founding more than a decade ago, the Australian Christian Lobby (ACL) has become a prominent player in public life. Indeed, its own website claims the group has "positioned itself as one of the premier political lobbies in the country". It also provides a regular source of media commentary on a range of issues and is quoted in parliamentary debates.

Given these facts, it is only fair to ask what policies ACL pursues.

ACL's longstanding acceptance of some level of recognition of same-sex couples has raised eyebrows in some circles - as did their inclusion of environmental issues in voting guides alongside matters of life and death.

However, it is their more recent activities which have given cause for concern among pro-life, pro-family and faith-based activists.

Late-term abortions

Recently, the public were invited to makes submissions to a federal inquiry into Senator Guy Barnett's proposal to remove Medicare funding from late-term abortions. Many good submissions were received by the inquiry. ACL's offering was certainly comprehensive and well-presented, but made some ill-chosen remarks regarding abortion.

According to the submission, "where a fetus has a lethal abnormality and would not be expected to survive once born, [ACL] would accept a new Medicare Item number to provide funding for abortions in these very rare circumstances" - although advocating support for parents who wished to continue the pregnancy (ACL submission, page 8).

This statement does not sit well with ACL's statement in the same paper that "all people are of inherent and equal moral value, irrespective of their physical or mental state".

Giving ACL the benefit of the doubt, one could argue it is actually seeking compromise for the sake of preventing at least some abortions from occurring, rather than failing to prevent any.

However, it bodes poorly for the future of pro-life rhetoric if it can be agreed that some abortions are acceptable. If it cannot be agreed that abortion is always wrong, it then merely degenerates into a battle of how and when and who pays for it...

Perhaps a misunderstanding also caused ACL, in the same paper, to trip over the case of life-threatening maternal disease.

In such cases, ACL rightly points out that a procedure may be undertaken such that "the intent... is not to terminate the life of the fetus but to preserve the life of the mother" (page 9).

Unfortunately, ACL here fails to emphasise that such a procedure should not be conducted as an abortion, but rather a live birth with full intention to save the child, even when it may be a seemingly hopeless cause.

Comments such as "where... the only way of saving her [the mother] is to end the life of her unborn child" once again implies the acceptability of some abortions and flies in the face of traditional Christian ethics.

On some political and social issues, it is commendable for people to consider both sides of an argument, especially in order to refine their own position.

However, on the all-important life-and-death issue of euthanasia, it is puzzling to see the ACL's quarterly magazine Debate take a seemingly even-handed approach by according equal space to opposing views, the first by Queensland pro-life activist Dr David van Gend; the second by none other than euthanasia advocate Dr Phillip Nitschke (Debate, Issue 3, August 2008).

ACL's desire to be on good terms with politicians of all persuasions has resulted in some unintended outcomes.

Opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull was keynote speaker at ACL's recent national conference in Canberra. The audience applauded when he spoke of his Christian faith and quoted from Scripture, but they fell silent when he expressed his pro-abortion view that a woman had the right to end an unwanted pregnancy.

Mr Turnbull's opinion that there should be no discrimination against same-sex couples also received a cool reception.

In subsequent media reports, Mr Turnbull's controversial views made the national headlines, thereby obscuring the very pro-life, pro-family issues that the ACL was promoting.

-Damian Wyld is South Australian state president of the National Civic Council.

Editor's note: ACL's Jim Wallace AM has responded to the above article in the December 6 issue of News Weekly




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm