December 6th 2008

  Buy Issue 2794

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Opposition tensions to resurface in 2009?

EDITORIAL: Left-liberals to dominate Obama Administration

GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: Disentangling the new world disorder

SUPERMARKETS: GroceryWatch is a white elephant

POLITICAL IDEAS: The realisable goal of property for all

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Giving to the have-mores / How long can Labor last? / Degraded educational standards / Future prospects

BANKING: The Medici — manipulators of money and soft power

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Abortion increases risk of pre-term births

EUGENICS: The menace of eugenics, yesterday and today

MARRIAGE: US battle to preserve traditional marriage

CINEMA: Depraved film the symptom of a sick culture - the Coen Brothers' Burn After Reading

Australian Christian Lobby responds (letter)

Chechen terrorists (letter)

BOOKS: WARSAW 1920: Lenin's Failed Conquest of Europe, by Adam Zamoyski

Books promotion page

Australian Christian Lobby responds (letter)

by Jim Wallace AM

News Weekly, December 6, 2008

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to Damian Wyld's article, "Assessing the Australian Christian Lobby" (News Weekly, November 22, 2008.)

ACL seeks to bring Christ's influence into public policy, and does so strenuously, while acknowledging that in a secular, democratic state we must accept the majority decision in the end.

This is not compromising, as the article implies, and certainly does not see ACL holding relationships with politicians above principle, as our record of often very public conflict with parties and individuals shows.

ACL's position on conceding Medicare funding for induced labour where there is a lethal foetal abnormality is the same as that of Senator Guy Barnett, other pro-life parliamentarians and also Dr David van Gend who, interestingly, escape Mr Wyld's criticism — perhaps rightly wishing to guard relationship with them.

The criticism of our Debate magazine is puzzling. We believe in what I had always thought was the strong tradition of the NCC's founder, B.A. Santamaria, that we have to take on prevailing views, confident that they can be dismantled by well put Christian argument.

Debate unashamedly does that and seeks to ensure those juxtaposed positions are available in politicians' offices throughout Australia in time for upcoming parliamentary debates. As an example, Debate articles by Dr Nitshcke (pro-euthanasia) and Dr van Gend (pro-life) assisted in convincing some Victorian politicians (not normally associated with pro-life views) to vote against the euthanasia bill there, which was defeated.

In the same way, Malcolm Turnbull's views on abortion and homosexual issues are well known, but we need to engage him if we are to have any chance of changing them. His invitation to the ACL National Conference was designed to give him an opportunity to state his positions and for us to respond to them, as the start of this process.

I suggest that if we only invite people who agree with us on everything, there will be very few people to engage and will result in less influence in the parliaments.

I am surprised that the appropriateness of a question on the environment being put to parties before the last election would be criticised in this day and age, and all the more with our Christian responsibility for stewardship.

It is disappointing that an article purporting to be an assessment of ACL would not have mentioned our lead roles in defining marriage in Commonwealth Law in 2004, blocking civil unions in the ACT, securing structural changes to the Office of Film and Literature and Classification and the blocking of the brothel legislation in Tasmania; and our successful advocacy with others for the Millennium Development Goals, against cloning and euthanasia in WA and Vic respectively, and for internet filtering and school chaplaincy, to name just a few.

More importantly, though, we aim to raise the profile of the Christian constituency so that its views will be heard and considered; and I think that, together with the work of the many other parts of the Christian community, like the NCC, this is happening.

I just pray that we will continue to acknowledge our different roles and perspectives as parts of that diverse community and trust in God that He will profit those solutions He chooses to, regardless of where in the body they originate.

Jim Wallace AM,
Managing Director,
Australian Christian Lobby,
Canberra, ACT

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am