September 29th 2007


  Buy Issue 2765
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

FEDERAL ELECTION 2007: NCC policy initiatives on biofuels and Internet safety

EDITORIAL: Horse flu outbreak: time to face hard facts

CANBERRA OBSERVED: John Howard's risky succession strategy

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Will we learn from our quarantine debacle?

DEFENCE: Emerging nuclear challenges for Australia

NATIONAL SECURITY: Another triumph for the ABC or potential calamity?

EMPLOYMENT: Offshore assets most Australians never see

SCHOOLS: How much should we pay teachers who don't deliver?

LIFE ISSUES: 'Rosita', poster-child for pro-abortion lobby

UNITED STATES: Questions over Republican nomination

OPINION: Disgrace of the West's 'cognitive dissonance'

AS THE WORLD TURNS: libertarianism, lesbian's twins, Chinese toys, anti-Americanism

Kevin Rudd's motherhood statements (letter)

Kevinism or a Ruddism? (letter)

Facility with languages (letter)

Australia needs American help with defence (letter)

BOOKS: THE DAWKINS DELUSION? by Alister McGrath

BOOKS: FAITH THROUGH REASON, by Janne Haaland Matláry

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

Australia needs American help with defence (letter)


by Greg Byrne

News Weekly, September 29, 2007

Sir,

John Miller, in the past, has discussed attitudes of Australians towards the war on terrorism in terms of their being too laid back about it (News Weekly, July 21, 2007).

What is Australia's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan really all about? As with Vietnam, it's about keeping America involved with Australia. Since the fall of Singapore in 1942, Australians have needed an assurance that the Americans will always come to their aid.

This was largely behind Australia's Vietnam commitment. When the war was lost, it didn't matter to Australians because the main objective was achieved, i.e., maintaining a strong relationship with America.

If one goes back to 1999, when the Indonesian militias were butchering East Timorese on a large scale, one can see what it's really all about. US President Bill Clinton didn't want to get involved, and suddenly Australians discovered what a defence crisis without America might be like, and they were not happy.

So it's hardly surprising that John Howard was quick to respond to President George W. Bush's request to become involved in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Mr Howard was following the time-honoured practice of keeping America on side.

Greg Byrne,
Rowville, Vic.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am