October 27th 2007

  Buy Issue 2767

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Key issues that could determine the election outcome

QUEENSLAND: ALP cannot escape Heiner affair

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Is Kevin Rudd set to trounce the Coalition

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Surprises in store in SA's federal poll

VICTORIA: Abortion - an inadequate inquiry

EQUINE INFLUENZA INQUIRY: AQIS quarantine protocol a sick joke

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Global financial crisis - is the end in sight?

SCHOOLS: Surviving ideological bias in the classroom

EDUCATION: What can Australian schools learn from Asia?

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Theatre of the bull-ring / More significant than the election

SPECIAL FEATURE: Australian Aborigines at the crossroads

UNITED STATES: Has the US forgotten the importance of soft power?

OPINION: Violent Jihadism - this century's nightmare


BOOKS: DEFENDING LIFE: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, by Francis J. Beckwith

BOOKS: LIONHEART AND LACKLAND: King Richard, King John and the Wars of Conquest, by Frank J. McLynn

Books promotion page

LIONHEART AND LACKLAND: King Richard, King John and the Wars of Conquest, by Frank J. McLynn

by Michael Daniel (reviewer)

News Weekly, October 27, 2007
Two medieval kings re-examined

King Richard, King John and the Wars of Conquest

by Frank J. McLynn
(London: Vintage, new edition)
Paperback: 592 pages
Rec. price: AUD$29.95

For those of us reared on studying British history, capped off with watching Errol Flynn playing the dashing Robin Hood in the 1938 early colour film of the same name, and the reading of Sir Walter Scott's 1819 classic Ivanhoe, King Richard I of England was traditionally depicted as a brave and noble warrior, and King John as an evil and largely incompetent schemer.

However, in recent decades it has become fashionable among revisionist historians to challenge these assumptions by arguing that John received a bad press from hostile contemporary sources, whereas Richard's warrior skills blinded contemporary writers to the defects that revisionists claim to have discovered, such as mismanagement of his kingdom.

Frank J. McLynn challenges these revisionists and argues that the traditional portraits and interpretations of Richard and John are substantially correct.

Overwhelming evidence

Central to his argument is his claim that the historical facts speak for themselves and provide overwhelming evidence to support the traditional interpretation.

Exploring the lives of the brother-kings chronologically, from their father Henry II's marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine, to the death of John, McLynn examines their characters and actions during this significant period in English history.

Henry II and his son Richard regarded their English possessions as secondary to their French ones, the jewel in their empire being Normandy.

However, with the loss of Normandy by John in 1204, English monarchs became increasingly dependent and focussed upon their English kingdom. It was an era in which monarchs and nobles jostled almost constantly for their power, thus resulting in virtually continuous military campaigns, the only major interruption in Richard's case being the years in which he went on the Third Crusade, after learning that Jerusalem had fallen to the Muslim warrior Saladin.

The portrait that emerges of Richard is not only that of a brave warrior, but also of an extremely competent commander and military thinker, who, for example, effectively used the strategy of surprise on superior numbers of his Saracen enemy during the crusade.

McLynn argues that, although Richard spent little of his reign in England, he governed it competently, with major administrative problems during his absence being caused by his brother John.

However, McLynn concedes one major criticism of Richard as a military commander: that on one occasion he massacred large numbers of prisoners.

Other criticisms are that Richard used England simply as a source of revenue, for example, on one occasion before his departure on the Third Crusade, and on another occasion for ransom money after he was captured by the Holy Roman Emperor just before Christmas 1192 when returning from the Crusade. McLynn notes that, while the taxes and levies for this ransom money were burdensome, Richard has received less criticism for these than has John for the taxes the latter king imposed during his reign.

Indeed, McLynn contrasts John with Richard. Richard competently fought and played off a number of rivals, from the time in his early adulthood when he supported a rebellion against his father, Henry II, until his death, notwithstanding the period of his captivity by the Holy Roman Emperor, which gave his rivals the advantage.

John, by contrast, through military mismanagement and poor strategy and leadership, lost Normandy, one of the prize possessions of the Angevins, in 1204.

His dispute with Pope Innocent III, lasting from 1205 to 1213, was largely over the nomination of the Archbishop of Canterbury. This saw England placed under interdict.

The various taxes and measures John introduced served only to undermine his command over the barons who revolted and forced him to sign the Magna Carta at Runnymede in 1215.

Although the intended beneficiaries of the concessions in this document were by and large the barons, numerous clauses would be identified by later legal experts as the basis for various rights and liberties benefiting the rest of the population.

McLynn's Lionheart and Lackland contains interesting analysis of this period. However, the largely chronological recounting of events can, at times, be demanding of the reader's concentration.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am