BOOKS: by Bill MuehlenbergNews Weekly
DEFENDING LIFE: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, by Francis J. Beckwith
, October 27, 2007
Invaluable resource for pro-life causeDEFENDING LIFE:
A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice
by Francis J. Beckwith
(New York: Cambridge University Press)
Paperback: 312 pages
Rec. price: AUD$45.00This is certainly the newest pro-life work to appear, and arguably among the best. It not only sets out the legal, rational, moral and philosophical case against abortion choice, but it more broadly makes the case for human equality and the sanctity of life.
Francis J. Beckwith is an American professor of law and philosophy who has written extensively on these issues previously. This volume brings together years of thinking and debating on this contentious issue.
It is an invaluable resource for all those wishing to stand up for human life at all stages of development, and to counter the arguments of the pro-choice brigade.Moral reasoning
The first third of the book paints with broad brush-strokes, examining moral reasoning, legal considerations and political dimensions of the abortion debate.
The second third of the book looks more closely at the abortion debate per se
, looking at the science, the morality and the arguments involved.
The final third of the book extends these considerations to recent developments in bioethics, including cloning and stem-cell research.
The second and longest section does many things, including carefully dismantling the various arguments put forward by the pro-abortion camp. All the leading pro-abortion thinkers, such as Thompson, Boonin, Stretton, and Dworkin are taken on, with their positions carefully assessed and interacted with.
On the broader issue of human equality, Beckwith argues for the substance view which states that a human being "is intrinsically valuable because of the sort of thing it is, and the human being remains that sort of thing as long as it exists". That is, an individual "maintains absolute identity through time while it grows, develops and undergoes numerous changes".
Various functions and capacities, whether fully realised or utilised, do not constitute a person. Thus a human being is never a potential person, but is always a person at different stages of development, whether potential properties and capacities are actualised or not.
This view stand in stark contrast to the utilitarian and functionalist views held by most pro-abortionists. They argue that personhood is not inherent or intrinsic, but based on certain capacities and functions, be it consciousness, sentience, self-awareness, the ability to reason, and so on.
As to the specifics of the abortion debate, Beckwith responds to the numerous objections raised by pro-abortionists over the years. For example, consider the argument often heard, involving the hard cases of rape and incest. These are certainly tragic events, but in no way can they be used to justify an abortion.
First, such cases are extremely rare, making up just a tiny fraction of all abortions. Second, to argue for the legalisation of abortion because of these extreme cases would be similar to arguing that we eliminate traffic laws because in some rare cases they need to be violated, as in rushing a loved one to hospital.
Third, it simply begs the question by assuming the unborn child is not fully human. Fourth, to justify abortion in these circumstances is to argue that it is acceptable to forfeit a life for the alleged benefit of another. But a basic ethical intuition argues that we may not kill one person to possibly save another. John may desperately need a vital organ of Mary to stay alive; but he has no right to demand it, especially if it entails killing her in the process.
Beckwith also examines the more recent, and difficult, cases of embryo research, human-cloning and stem-cell therapies, looking at the various justifications given for them, and their pro-life responses. Similar issues arise here concerning the nature of personhood and the inviolability of life.
The author closes by summarising his case as it has been argued throughout: the unborn are full members of the human community; it is wrong to kill members of that community; abortion kills the unborn entity; therefore abortion is morally wrong.
The 300 pages of tightly-knit argumentation and logically-constructed reasoning take on nearly all the major justifications for abortion. All are found wanting - morally, legally and philosophically. Beckwith is to be praised for assembling in one volume some of the best pro-life argumentation around.