October 27th 2007

  Buy Issue 2767

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Key issues that could determine the election outcome

QUEENSLAND: ALP cannot escape Heiner affair

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Is Kevin Rudd set to trounce the Coalition

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Surprises in store in SA's federal poll

VICTORIA: Abortion - an inadequate inquiry

EQUINE INFLUENZA INQUIRY: AQIS quarantine protocol a sick joke

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Global financial crisis - is the end in sight?

SCHOOLS: Surviving ideological bias in the classroom

EDUCATION: What can Australian schools learn from Asia?

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Theatre of the bull-ring / More significant than the election

SPECIAL FEATURE: Australian Aborigines at the crossroads

UNITED STATES: Has the US forgotten the importance of soft power?

OPINION: Violent Jihadism - this century's nightmare


BOOKS: DEFENDING LIFE: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice, by Francis J. Beckwith

BOOKS: LIONHEART AND LACKLAND: King Richard, King John and the Wars of Conquest, by Frank J. McLynn

Books promotion page

Abortion - an inadequate inquiry

by Charles Francis, AM, QC, RFD

News Weekly, October 27, 2007
Women are not adequately warned of the many medical risks of abortion, such as psychological damage, writes Charles Francis QC.

In July this year, Victorian state MP Candy Broad foreshadowed her bill to decriminalise all abortion. The then Labor Premier Mr Steve Bracks said he believed Victoria's abortion system was effective; but added that, if it could be improved by complete decriminalisation and dealt with under the Health Act instead, he would support decriminalisation.

Similar views were subsequently expressed by his colleague Mr John Brumby. Liberal Opposition leader Ted Baillieu indicated some support, but said he wanted to see details. Late in September, Premier Brumby referred the issue to the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC).


The pro-abortion lobby have been pushing hard to decriminalise all abortion. They would have been greatly cheered by the VLRC's restricted terms of reference. The commission was only asked to provide options to clarify the existing operation of the law and to remove from the Crimes Act offences relating to terminations when performed by a qualified medical practitioner.

Many drew the inference that Mr Brumby wants the VLRC to recommend all abortions performed by medical practitioners be decriminalised.

Before the VLRC proposes any recommendation, however, it is very important that the commission be fully informed on what is happening in the Victorian abortion industry today, and in particular, the consequences to women. Similar information is needed by our MPs before they vote on any proposed legislation.

It requires no genius or even a law degree to realise that before you legalise anything, you need to know just what it is you are legalising and be able to make some assessment of possible consequences.

Contrary to Bracks's opinion, Victoria's abortion system is a disaster. Neither the medical profession nor the government exercises any proper control over it. Most abortionists are motivated solely by greed and have little concern for the welfare of the women upon whom they operate. Women are not adequately warned of the many medical risks of abortion, such as psychological damage, nor are they given any proper counselling or appropriately advised of other options.

Recently, my wife Babette and I appeared before the VLRC chairman, Professor Neil Rees. He listened courteously as we raised some of these issues, but appears to see himself constrained by the terms of reference.

Deeply concerned by the present terms, we consider the following 10 terms should be added to the existing two terms:

1) Introduce anti-coercion legislation to ensure that when a woman seeks an abortion the decision is her own choice and is not being sought by reason of pressure applied to her by other persons, such as her husband, partner or family.

2) Introduce legislation which will ensure that before any abortion takes place the woman concerned:

i) receives proper independent counselling informing her of the risks involved and of other available options, and

ii) has an adequate cooling-off period before any final decision is made.

3) Introduce legislation which will ensure that the medical risks (both physical and psychological) of the abortion are adequately explained both orally and/or in writing by the abortion-provider prior to any abortion being performed.

4) Introduce legislation requiring or enabling a woman to see an ultra-sound of her unborn child prior to any abortion taking place.

5) Introduce legislation requiring that no abortions be performed outside public hospitals, and that no abortions be performed by anyone not a salaried medical practitioner.

6) Introduce legislation requiring that, when it is proposed to perform an abortion on a woman under the age of 16 years, the abortion-provider must first obtain parental consent.

7) Introduce legislation that where a woman under the age of 16 years is seeking an abortion, the abortion-provider is required to inform the police if a statutory rape has occurred.

8) Introduce legislation that when an unlawful termination occurs, the woman concerned be given immunity from prosecution.

9) Introduce legislation requiring that where any termination is being proposed after 20 weeks' gestation, adequate legal safeguards are provided so that the unborn child is given the maximum opportunity of survival.

10) Amend the Victorian Wrongs Act to enable women in Victoria to sue for damages

a) where by reason of negligence the person or persons providing the abortion have caused injury or damage to the woman concerned, and/or

b) where there has been no prior warning given by the person or persons providing the abortion of the material risks of performing the abortion.

Urged to write

Victorian News Weekly readers are urged to write to Premier John Brumby, Deputy Premier and Attorney-General Mr Rob Hulls, and Opposition leader Mr Ted Baillieu, and their local MLAs and MLCs, suggesting that the VLRC's terms of reference should be widened.

Submissions to the VLRC (GPO Box 4637, Melbourne, Vic 3001) close on November 9, 2007.

- Charles Francis, AM QC, is a retired Melbourne barrister and former Victorian state MP.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am