November 24th 2007

  Buy Issue 2769

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: 2007 Federal Election contest enters final round

CANBERRA OBSERVED: John Howard's last-ditch pitch to voters

WATER: Governments raid irrigation water

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Musharraf takes Pakistan to the brink of chaos

ASIA: Can Taiwan resist falling into China's orbit?

PACIFIC: Power struggle behind alleged Fiji coup

STRAWS IN THE WIND: John Howard's last hurrah? / Putin's new Russian empire / Junk-food on children's television / Corruption in Victoria / Banking on Kevin Rudd

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: The unacknowledged elephant in the room

OPINION: Pro-life outcry for dolphins, but not for humans

OPINION: Economics isn't everything

SCHOOLS: The case for external, competitive exams

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: The massive assault on Judeo-Christian values

Why education has been captured by the Left (letter)

Culprit of centralisation? (letter)

BOOKS: COMRADES: A History Of World Communism, by Robert Service

Books promotion page

Why education has been captured by the Left (letter)

by John Kelly

News Weekly, November 24, 2007

While acknowledging the Left-wing capture of universities, schools and teachers' unions in Labor states criticised by Mark Lopez (News Weekly, October 27, 2007), a correspondent in The Australian (October 31), responding to the same article, challenged the author to explain why "conservatives" have been so ineffectual in resisting leftist hegemony on the educational front in "the culture wars".

I suggest several reasons:

i) the climate of relativism encouraged in schooling by social engineering and the accompanying imposition of political correctness through curriculum revision in recent decades, facilitated through the expansion of educational bureaucracy;

ii) the implementation of "affirmative action" policy in tertiary, secondary and primary teaching appointments;

iii) the preoccupation of "conservative" teachers with the practice of classroom teaching itself, rather than the politics of curriculum;

iv) the irregular procedures that preclude debate in key learning area curriculum meetings;

v) the unprofessional ignoring of considered correspondence and the effective unaccountability of incumbents in the educational bureaucracy.

John Kelly,
Tranmere, SA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am