May 12th 2007

  Buy Issue 2755

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: ANZAC DAY: A new dawn for Australian national pride

EDITORIAL: Labor's uranium policy: when 'yes' means 'no'

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Has Kevin Rudd made his biggest mistake?

WATER: Water crisis: farmers' warnings ignored

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Why Kevin Rudd leads in the polls

LABOR PARTY: Australian union movement's last hurrah

STRAWS IN THE WIND: ABC's John Curtin - a missed opportunity / Labor conference a gold-plated flop / Melbourne's continuing transport fiasco / Ice man cometh

INTELLIGENCE CORNER: Terror Australis - will the public ever wake up?

FAMILY ASSISTANCE: Howard's cash benefits for families

SCHOOLS: Report slams school curriculum muddle

DRUGS POLICY: $150 million campaign against 'Ice' - too little, too late

MEDICAL: Oral contraceptive link to breast cancer

HISTORY: Wilberforce's epic battle to end slavery

Plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka (letter)

Sinhalese speaking up for Tamils (letter)

Religious vilification laws (letter)

General Monash (letter)

BOOKS: BETWEEN TWO WORLDS: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce

BOOKS: THE OCCUPATION OF IRAQ: Winning the War, Losing the Peace

Books promotion page

$150 million campaign against 'Ice' - too little, too late

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, May 12, 2007
The Federal Government announces its new anti-drugs initiative, reports Peter Westmore.

The announcement by the Prime Minister that his government will spend an additional $150 million to counter the emerging illegal drug epidemic of “ice”, crystal methamphetamine, highlights the continuing problem of illegal drug use in Australia, and the failures of “harm minimisation” as a means of addressing it.

Ice, and the family of amphetamines of which it is a part, have been a growing problem in Australia over the past 20 years. It emerged as a “party drug” in the 1990s and, like other mind-altering drugs, was treated by health authorities as little more than a harmless stimulant.

The dangers of physical and psychological addiction were ignored, as was the evidence that drug use was associated with psychotic episodes, addiction and criminal behaviour.

“Harm minimisation”

The official mantra was that if you were going to use drugs, you should make sure that you knew their strength, and only take drugs in company, to avert the danger of overdoses: to use the phrase, “harm minimisation”.

Associated with the view that illegal drugs were basically a lifestyle choice was the association of illicit drugs with prescription drug abuse, alcohol and tobacco. Comparisons were made about the cost to the community of use of these substances, and the conclusion was drawn that illicit drugs were less costly to the community than tobacco or alcohol.

The message was that illicit drugs are a lesser problem than “legal” drugs and that, as we have legalised tobacco and alcohol, so we should legalise a range of substances such as marijuana, heroin and the amphetamine stimulants.

The results are now visible for all to see.

Six years ago, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reported that recent drug use was as follows: marijuana (18 per cent of those aged 14 and over), amphetamines (around 4 per cent), and ecstasy/designer drugs (2 per cent). Around 1 per cent had used heroin, cocaine, or injected an illegal drug, during the previous 12 months.

In 2007, the institute reported that usage of illegal drugs remained at almost the same level, except for marijuana where usage levels have dropped by a few percentage points.

However, as use of illegal drugs is concentrated in the 18-29 year age group, the figure is far worse than that shown above. The institute said, “Almost one in three people (31 per cent) in this age bracket had used at least one illicit drug and one in four had used marijuana/cannabis in the previous 12 months.”

It added that about one in eight people aged 20–29 years had recently used ecstasy, and around one in 10 had used meth/amphetamine in the last 12 months. Similar proportions of persons aged 18–19 years had recently used ecstasy and meth/amphetamine, each at 9 per cent.

These mind-altering drugs act not only as stimulants, but induce psychotic behaviour, including paranoia, violent outbursts and depression, and cause degeneration in the brain. As “ice” is also highly addictive, such behaviour can quickly become chronic, virtually destroying the user's life.

Since the Howard Government came into office in 1996, the Federal Government has adopted a consistent policy of cutting supply, by increasing the powers of Customs and the Federal Police to intercept drugs entering the country. These efforts have had a significant effect.

However, because of the key role of the states in both law enforcement and health, there has been no corresponding effort to reduce demand.

Only when supply and demand for illicit drugs are cut, will the impact of illicit drug use be minimised.

Other countries have gone down the same path. Sweden was one of the first countries in Western Europe to adopt a tolerant policy towards illicit drug use, based on the “harm minimisation” approach. For example, it was possible in 1960s Sweden for people addicted to drugs to obtain prescriptions for amphetamines and narcotics; penalties for possession of illicit drugs were reduced, except for large-scale drug trafficking. The plan was to cut supply, in the expectation that illicit drug use would decline.

It didn't. Drug use escalated and it became a major social and public health policy. Since the 1970s, Sweden's drug policy has changed fundamentally. Penalties for drug offences were increased and the primary goal of public policy became a drug-free society.


The Swedish policy does not rely just on penalising drug users. One of the stated goals of Swedish drug policy is to rehabilitate users rather than punish them by way of the legal system.

Since 1982, drug treatment programs of up to six months' duration are mandatory for illicit-drug users (and also for alcoholics). The main reason for this type of treatment is to protect the user or others in cases of life-threatening situations and to motivate the user to continue treatment on a voluntary basis.

The program is supported by all main parties, is funded by governments, and supported by an overwhelming majority of the people. The effect has been to reduce usage of illegal drugs over the previous year to less than one per cent of the population, compared to about 20 per cent in Australia.

Australia can, and should, do the same.

- Peter Westmore.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am