March 3rd 2007

  Buy Issue 2750

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: John Howard's election year dilemma

EDITORIAL: Climate change: time for a reality check

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Water and ethanol - time to think big

WATER: Who will stand up for states' rights?

RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM: Sabotage and piracy on the high seas

CHINA: 'Bloody Harvest' - organ-harvesting latest

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Ecclesiastical charades / Rudd's credibility / Victoria's new Second Chamber / Putin's way

SPECIAL FEATURE: New light on Bob Santamaria

EUTHANASIA: Male suicide rise linked to euthanasia debate

OPINION: Dangers of a 'same-sex' register

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: South Korean-US relations under strain

OPINION: Climate change - hot air, big bucks, cold facts

Truth not always a defence (letter)

How Rudd could beat Coalition (letter)

The bushfire crisis (letter)

U.S. Presidential candidates (letter)

Government subsidies and health hazards (letter)

OBITUARY: Vale Charles Coffey (1906-2007)

CINEMA: Heart-warming rags-to-riches story - The Pursuit of Happyness

BOOKS: DUMBING DOWN, by Kevin Donnelly

BOOKS: DOWN TO THIS: A Year Living with the Homeless

Books promotion page

Truth not always a defence (letter)

by Damien Wyld

News Weekly, March 3, 2007

I write in response to Roslyn Phillips's article, "When truth is no defence" (News Weekly, February 3, 2007).

It's worth pointing out that, even in existing defamation laws, truth is not always a defence.

With regard to the Equal Opportunity (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill (the "EO Bill") currently before the South Australian Parliament, much of the hyperbole surrounding the debate could have been avoided had the State Government chosen to circulate a draft for comment.

Circulation of proposed SA religious vilification laws led to plans being shelved in 2003 after a great deal of church and community dissent, spearheaded by the National Civic Council.

But for now we must endure both a troubling bill and well-meaning but unhelpful material in reply. My favourite so far is probably a leaflet entitled "A ban on the Bible?", complete with a gagged figure in a suit.

Current indications are that the EO Bill will be blocked in the upper house. But with the numbers apparently standing at 11 to 10, we cannot bank on this. Nor can we bank on the State Government not returning at a later date with a new bill, redrafted to satisfy the concerns of other MPs.

Either way, the NCC will continue to work constructively to achieve the best possible outcome.

Damian Wyld,
SA State President,
National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am