June 9th 2007


  Buy Issue 2757
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Climate change: don't spoil a good story with facts

NATIONAL SECURITY: How to fight global terrorism

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd attack on Howard comes unstuck

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Nuclear power, ethanol can cut CO2 emissions

PRIMARY INDUSTRY: Wheat industry win, but final outcome uncertain

OPINION: Caving in to predatory big business

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Workplace relations and human asset-stripping / The Tampa victory revisited / Another tinsel turkey for Auntie / Show and tell

DRUGS POLICY: Drugs must be a federal election issue

CHINA: Beijing's crackdown ahead of Olympics

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: Can we afford to ignore the Middle East?

MEDICAL ETHICS: Intentionally deformed ... for her own good?

EDUCATION: Intact family the single most critical factor in academic success

THE WORLD: Poland - front line in the culture wars

OBITUARY: Polish-Australian Stan Gotowicz a man of many parts

Howard Government's 'generosity' disputed (letter)

Apology for error (letter)

Why families can't afford a home (letter)

CINEMA: Family - the necessary refuge for sinners

BOOKS: MENACE IN EUROPE: Why the Continent's Crisis is America's, by Claire Berlinski

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED:
Kevin Rudd attack on Howard comes unstuck




News Weekly, June 9, 2007
The controversy over Kevin Rudd's wife's company could seriously damage the Labor Opposition leader's reputation.

While the Howard Government appears stuck dangerously low in the polls, the controversy over Kevin Rudd's wife's company is emerging as a possible threat to his hopes of becoming Prime Minister later in the year.

At a minimum, the affair will blunt planned attacks by the Labor Party and the ACTU on the Howard Government's WorkChoices laws in the lead-up to the federal election.

But if initial allegations reported in newspapers are proved to be correct, there are potential serious problems for the Labor Party and a headache for Mr Rudd's own industrial-relations policy formulation.

News Limited papers originally reported that Thérèse Rein's company, WorkDirections, put workers on individual contracts that stripped them of key award conditions, including penalty rates, overtime and allowances for an extra 45¢ an hour.

It reported also that workers had been asked to do unpaid overtime, leaving them hundreds of dollars worse off than they would have been if they had stayed on the award.

Launched investigation

The Federal Government's Office of Workplace Services has launched an investigation into the newspapers' claims.

Ms Rein's company has done very well out of the Howard Government's Job Network agency, which replaced the old Commonwealth Employment Service.

Her company is the largest "for profit" provider for the Job Network and the third largest overall and has revenues of $175 million, which include its overseas operations.

Ms Rein's company's response to the initial reports was to blame the previous owners and to claim that, while "honest mistakes" had been made, they were rectified once they were known.

She also voluntarily disclosed that 50-odd workers had been compensated for being underpaid after being "misclassified" by the previous owner.

As the furore developed, Ms Rein also moved to sell the Australian arm of her successful job-placement business which could realise her as much as $80 million, according to some reports.

Labor had hoped that would be the end of the matter, banking on a degree of public sympathy for Ms Rein's plight and confusion about the nature of the "mistakes" admitted by her company to avoid further media scrutiny.

The problem was the original story was not about misclassification of people's jobs; it was about an individual contract which appeared, on face value, to have left a worker worse off than they would have been under an award.

Unlike the Howard Government's controversial Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs), Ms Rein's company preferred to use common law contracts.

In fact, none of Ms Rein's 800 Australian employees were on Labor's preferred collective agreements; they were all on individual contracts.

This in itself is an embarrassment for Mr Rudd because his wife's company shuns the very policy with which Labor is going to the election.

Labor says common law contracts are preferable to AWAs because they are underpinned by the award.

But if a common law contract can also be used to exploit a worker, Labor has a tough case to explain to voters that its system is better than the Government's, particularly after the introduction of the new fairness test.

Mr Rudd, the ACTU and Labor have also been quick to attack businesses which have exploited workers in the past - sometimes attacking firms which have later been found to have done nothing wrong.

This will be much more difficult from now on.

The problem now for Mr Rudd is how he can promote an alternative industrial-relations policy which promotes common law contracts for sectors such as the mining, which may prove to be just as "bad" for workers as AWAs.

And if the Labor leader's wife's company is found by investigators to have exploited some of her workers by putting them on inferior contracts and forcing them to do unpaid overtime, it will be a very bad look for Labor after months of a similar line of attack on the Government.

The controversy has the potential to seriously damage Mr Rudd's squeaky-clean reputation, and cast doubt in the minds of voters about the real motives for throwing out WorkChoices "lock, stock and barrel".




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm