December 8th 2007

  Buy Issue 2770

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: After the landslide: the challenges ahead

CULTURE: Dealing girls a raw and racy deal

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Has the Liberal Party any future?

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Can Australia avoid an economic downturn?

WATER: Vehement opposition to permanent water-trade

QUARANTINE: Horse flu inquiry exposes AQIS's abject failure

NATIONAL SECURITY: We have met the enemy, and he is us

STRAWS IN THE WIND: The WHY and HOW of Labor's victory / Now for the Delphic Oracle ...

CULTURE: Dealing girls a raw and racy deal

SCIENCE: People will marry robots, scientist predicts

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Abortion link to pre-term birth and cerebral palsy

MEDICINE: Dolly's creator abandons therapeutic cloning

OPINION: William Wilberforce's lessons for us today

Bad economics (letter)

Ten points for Kevin Rudd (letter)

DLP resurgence (letter)


BOOKS: PRINCE OF THE CHURCH: Patrick Francis Moran, 1830-1911, by Philip Ayres

BOOKS: CONJUGAL AMERICA: On the Public Purposes of Marriage, by Allan Carlson

Books promotion page

Vehement opposition to permanent water-trade

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, December 8, 2007
Permanent water-trade will weaken agriculture and regional economies, farmers argue in a long-awaited report.

A long-awaited report has revealed "widespread, vehement community opposition to permanent water-trade" out of irrigation districts.

Permanent water-trade of irrigation is at the core of the federal and state National Water Initiative (NWI) and of the $10 billion federal water plan, promoted by former Prime Minister John Howard and supported by the Federal Labor Party. The NWI separates farmers' water entitlement from land title in order to make "permanent" water-trading possible.

This has to be distinguished from "temporary" water-trade, whereby a farmer sells the excess water not being used this year to another farmer wanting more water this season. This policy is strongly supported by farmer and makes the most efficient use of water.

Water barons

Originally, governments told farmers that permanent water-trade would allow water to be traded from low- to high-value agriculture. Later, that changed to allow water to be traded from farms to cities, industries, the environment and any water-buyer, including water barons.

Permanent water-trade is essential for The Living Murray initiative, which aims to purchase 500,000 megalitres (one megalitre is the equivalent of an Olympic swimming pool) for environmental flows, and for the $10 billion federal water plan which aims to purchase another 3,500,000 megalitres for the environment or to extinguish irrigation licences. This would wipe $28 billion off the Australian economy, or 2.9 per cent off gross domestic product.

Farmers have argued that when water is permanently traded out of a region, it debilitates local infrastructure - schools, shops, farm-support industries, hospitals - and other farmers who find that, as water leaves the area, the cost of supplying irrigation water and maintaining water infrastructure becomes uneconomic.

While farmers have been strongly opposed to permanent water-trade for these reasons, governments have proceeded with water-trading policies without consulting irrigation communities in the Murray-Darling Basin.

Now a report, The Economic and Social Impacts of Water-Trading, confirms the negative effects of water-trading and admits that in regional communities there is "widespread, vehement community opposition to permanent water-trade" (p.xiv). Further, "some farmers have been ostracised by their community for selling their permanent water entitlements. With persistent drought, however, there is a greater appreciation that many individuals could be selling unwillingly" as the only way either to survive the drought or to leave farming respectably (p.49).

The report was produced for the National Water Commission (which oversees the NWI), the Murray-Darling Basin Commission and the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. It case-studied four areas: three in central and northern Victoria, Pyramid-Boort, Rochester, Kerang-Cohuna, and then Sunraysia, which stretches from Robinvale to Mildura along both sides of the Murray.

It found that there was a net trade of permanent water from the first three areas to Sunraysia, with virtually all the water going to "new plantings on land that [were] not previously irrigated", i.e., to highly controversial Managed Investment Schemes (MIS).

The report also found that, "Although water trading by entitlement holders is voluntary, the trade also affects third parties. Trade into a region can lead to increased competition in production, queuing for delivery of irrigation water, and higher water-tables. Trade out of a region can lead to increased water-delivery charges to remaining users (the 'stranded assets' problem), the build-up of disease and pest plants and animals, and depopulation." (p.50).

Advocates of water-trading had argued that water traded out of a region would eventually return. However, the report found that the social impacts of water traded out of regions "are not simply a temporary phenomenon associated with the introduction of water-trading; rather, they are likely to be a permanent feature of regional economies exposed to the rapid shifts - facilitated by water-trading - in investment between different types of irrigated agriculture".

The report says that communities losing water face loss of agricultural service industries, loss of population and social infrastructure.

Scourge of farm sector

However, the report falls short in treating MIS as a normal part of the rural economy, whereas MIS should be shut down. They are the scourge of the farm sector. They are not driven by market forces and the need to make a profit, but by tax concessions to wealthy investors. If governments refuse to subsidise family farmers, why should they be subsidising wealthy investors, giving them huge tax breaks to invest in MIS?

MIS lead to overproduction and the collapse of farm-gate prices, forcing genuine farmers out of business. They are forcing up the price of water and are causing serious environmental problems in some areas.

If the negative impacts of MIS are considered, the report's findings are even more damning of permanent water-trade, because most of the advantages of water-trading that it outlines are based on treating MIS as a normal part of the farm economy.

- Patrick J. Byrne is national vice-president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am