April 28th 2007


  Buy Issue 2754
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: East Timor election: what's cooking?

EDITORIAL: Implications of East Timor's election

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Kevin Rudd's character under scrutiny

OVERSEAS TRADE: Wheat-growers back single-desk selling

MANUFACTURING: Japan still shows the way

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Easter and the media / Literacy, and all that / Anzac Day / Jews and Muslims / Pre-Budget ruminations

DAVID HICKS AFFAIR: Media's blind eye to Hicks treason

THE COLD WAR: How Moscow framed Pope Pius XII as pro-Nazi

GREAT BRITAIN: Why Britain is no longer great

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: Lottery players fleeced for $100 million

ETHICS: New safeguard for vulnerable patients

HEALTH: Married gays die 24 years younger

OBITUARY: Dr John Billings (1918-2007) and the Culture of Life

AS THE WORLD TURNS: The unmarriage revolution / Unexpected outbreak of morality / Mediocrity on the march / Children recruited to spy for Big Brother

Antidotes to narcissism (letter)

Problems with surrogacy (letter)

Politicised public service (letter)

Bell tolls for national icon (letter)

CINEMA: Spartan sacrifice that saved Greece

BOOKS: WHY POLITICS NEEDS RELIGION, by Brendan Sweetman

BOOKS: BACKS TO THE WALL: A larrikin on the Western Front, by G.D. Mitchell with Robert Macklin

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

OVERSEAS TRADE:
Wheat-growers back single-desk selling


by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, April 28, 2007
A survey of wheat-growers has shown 82 per cent support an ongoing single selling-desk structure for the marketing of Australian bulk wheat exports.

Only 11 per cent supported multiple bulk sellers into overseas markets, and only 6 per cent wanted a totally deregulated system.

Tony Windsor, independent federal MP for New England, sponsored the poll, which was conducted by Rural Press Marketing Services. It generated 3,372 responses to an industry-wide survey of about 29,000 growers.

Until the Iraq wheat controversy, export wheat had been marketed through the single-desk marketing authority, AWB International, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AWB Ltd. Since the scandal, the Minister for Agriculture has held the right to veto, i.e., the right to issue export licences to a limited number of bulk traders.

The Coalition has been divided on the issue. The federal Nationals have stood firm in favour of the single desk, but the Liberals have been pushing for a multiple licensing system, with a revamped Wheat Export Authority holding the power of veto. The Liberals' proposal would effectively see multiple traders bidding down the price of wheat on the export market.

This contrasts with the large majority of wheat farmers who supported an ongoing single selling-desk export arrangement, 62 per cent want to separate AWB International from AWB Ltd with the objective of creating a grower-owned single-desk manager (AWB International) to market Australia's bulk export wheat internationally, leaving AWB Ltd a purely commercial agri-business company.

Over 68 per cent of those farmers producing over 5,000 tonnes also wanted to keep a single selling-desk arrangement. This has dispelled the view that only small grain-producers wanted the single desk.

When asked who should hold the veto power for bulk wheat exports, 43 per cent wanted AWB International to hold this power, while 29 per cent said they would prefer the Wheat Export Authority to become the single selling-desk.

Canadian barley-growers “conned” in single-desk poll

The Canadian Government is planning to remove from the Canadian Wheat Board its single selling-desk arrangements for Canadian barley-growers.

Its move follows a ballot of 3,703 growers in which one of the questions was effectively a “con job” on farmers.

Farmers voted on three options:

1). 37.8 per cent voted to retain the single selling-desk arrangement for barley.

2). 48.4 per cent voted yes to the option, “I would like the option to market my barley to the Canadian Wheat Board or any other domestic or foreign buyer.”

3). 13.8 per cent wanted to abolish the single-desk arrangements and allow open trade in barley.

Option 2 undoubtedly sounded reasonable to farmers, giving the impression that the single desk arrangements would remain. In reality, the effectiveness of a single desk is negated if it becomes just one of a number of sellers.

The Conservative Canadian government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been pushing for the abolition of the Canadian Wheat Board. It has put its own spin on the results, saying that the combined result of options 2 and 3 means that 62.2 per cent of farmers want to abolish the single desk.

This interpretation of the result is strongly disputed by many farmers and farmer peak bodies.

A single desk gives farmers collective bargaining power when selling on world markets. This is important, as farmers are price-takers not price-makers. As individuals, they have no bargaining power when selling into the grains market.

But in a situation where a single desk is abolished and multiple traders are allowed into the market, the traders are able to bid down the price paid to farmers.

The Canadian Government move follows a strong push by the handful of private world grain-traders, the US and the EU to have the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules amended in order to eliminate single selling-desks around the world, euphemistically referred to as “state trading enterprises”.

This powerful group regards any single selling-desk operating under the auspices of an act of parliament, such as in Australia, as being a state trading enterprise.

Commenting on this move, one member of the Canadian Wheat Board said last year, if this group “get their way, new WTO rules will make it illegal for any group of farmers to organise and collectively bargain for export crops”.

“This becomes an issue of national sovereignty,” he said. “The principle under attack is the democratic right of citizens or an economic group to have legislation enacted that empowers them to organise effectively in the interests of the majority.

“To deny Canadian grain farmers this right is also to put at risk this right for farmers producing products under the supply management system.”

- Patrick J. Byrne




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm