October 28th 2006


  Buy Issue 2743
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Media laws: dramatic change or maintaining status quo?

EDITORIAL: Water trading: what it's all about

TECHNOLOGY: Beijing bid to steal Australia's secret military technology

TRADE: The fate of Australian agriculture under globalisation

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: East Timor: the Cubans are coming

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Kofi and friends, Obituary wars, Skills shortages and literacy shortages

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: New strategy needed for global security, prosperity

SPECIAL FEATURE: What globalism is doing to 'Middle America'

EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH: Embryonic stem cells: fraud and fairy tales

ENERGY: Hot rocks: is geothermal heat the way ahead for power generation?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: North Korean nuclear test: implications for Middle East

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Empowering women: Israeli bid to curb Islamist extremism

Kyoto protocol (letter)

Queensland election (letter)

Margaret Whitlam (letter)

BOOKS: THE PARTNERSHIP, by Greg Sheridan

BOOKS: THE DEATH OF ADAM, by Marilynne Robinson

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

EDITORIAL:
Water trading: what it's all about


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, October 28, 2006
It was a sign of the times that on the very day the Victorian Government's more restrictive policy on water use in Melbourne was announced, the State Education Minister revealed that new swimming pools would be constructed in state schools. The new plan has the approval of both government and opposition parties. (Sunday Age, October 15, 2006)

The issue of water allocation has become a major public policy issue.

No major public reservoirs have been constructed in Australia for at least the past 20 years - despite substantial population growth and sustained drought. Incredibly, some state governments have said they will not approve any such development in the future.

For the past century, Australian governments have had responsibility for establishing publicly funded reservoirs, and have also determined the share available for consumption among irrigators, country towns and major cities. Governments have modified these allocations for various reasons, including drought, water availability and environmental flows.

Since the 1980s, governments have allowed limited trading of farmers' water entitlements. The theory is that the value of farmland depends on its access to guaranteed water, and, if farmers do not need to use their water entitlements, they should be able to sell them, and others should be able to buy them.

Free market in water

However, in recent years free market economists have argued that any valuable resource such as water rights should be saleable, so that water is used more efficiently, and at least theoretically, will be diverted from lower to higher value agriculture.

The South Australian Government's Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation states, "An open and effective water trading market is critical to achieving a sustainable balance in water resource management. Allowing water access entitlements to move between users in an open market mechanism ensures that the water allocated for consumptive use progressively moves to higher value uses.

"This not only results in greater production from the same (or less) volume of water but also accrues environmental benefits where water is traded from degraded areas and/or low value low efficiency production to areas more suited to irrigation using improved management practices on higher value crops."

Every other state has the same approach, which has also been entrenched in National Competition Policy and endorsed by the Productivity Commission, the Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics, employers' organizations and the National Farmers Federation.

In a report released in August, Rural Water Use and the Environment: The Role of Market Mechanisms, the Productivity Commission suggests that governments should use markets to more efficiently allocate water among competing users.

Others have argued that all water rights should be traded on the open markets, in the interests of economic efficiency. The objective has been vigorously pursued by the Council of Australian Governments' National Water Initiative.

Already, the consequences of the new policy are becoming alarmingly clear.

An independent report has shown that almost all of the traded water in northern Victoria has been bought not by other irrigators, but by what are known as Managed Investment Schemes, cashed-up city investors buying water rights as an investment for subsequent resale, or to supply water to blue gum plantations on what were formerly dairy farms.

Another study of Managed Investment Schemes showed that they are indirectly receiving over a third of their gross income as a result of generous government tax concessions.

David Cornish, a director of the rural consulting business, Mike Stephens and Associates, said, "We cannot understand why the Federal Government [is] prepared to sell out the majority of Australian agricultural producers and communities to support a handful of very wealthy individuals and publicly listed companies."

The other consequence of letting market forces rule is that Governments which have done nothing for decades to increase water storages or implement recycling are using water trading to divert large quantities of water previously earmarked for agriculture to the cities, because city consumers and industries can afford to pay far more for water than farmers.

Water from the Thompson Reservoir in Eastern Victoria, originally intended principally for farm irrigation, has primarily been allocated to Melbourne, while water from the Shoalhaven River in southern New South Wales is being diverted to meet the needs of Sydney.

In other words, water trading is an opportunity for profiteering by city-based water barons, and a camouflage for diverting irrigation water into the growing cities.

The long-term effects of this will be to undermine Australia's agriculture further, forcing families off the land, pushing up the price of food, and increasing Australia's reliance on imported foodstuffs. Is this what we really want?

- Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm