May 6th 2000


  Buy Issue 2582
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

RURAL: Wheat industry needs market support sche

EDITORIAL: Regulating the casino economy

CANBERRA OBSERVED: PM moves to "reinvent" the Coalition

LABOR RELATIONS: Privatised workers win in Federal Court

WELFARE REVIEW: Less welfare, fewer recipients?

TRANSPORT: How Government policy is sinking Australia's shipping industry

INDUSTRY POLICY: Ten point plan for industry recovery

Batlow: another country town faces extinction

LIFE ISSUES: Anzac, Easter, and Baby J

LETTERS

AS THE WORLD TURNS

GLOBALISATION: How technology and deregulation put society at risk

HEALTH:What's happened to blood supply safety?

FAMILY: Are we producing a generation of hyperactive zombies?

CUBA: Should Elian Gonzalez be returned to Cuba?

AFRICA: Zimbabwe violence discredits Mugabe

VIDEO: Thriller romp through mythical age

BOOKS: Alistair Cooke: the biography, by Nick Clarke

Books: The re-education of old Donald: 'Into the Open: Memoirs 1958-1999', by Donald Horne

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

LABOR RELATIONS:
Privatised workers win in Federal Court


by News Weekly

News Weekly, May 6, 2000
The Federal Government's Jobs Network has been dealt another blow, with Justice Marcus Einfeld of the Federal Court finding that employees of the government's Employment National were eligible for the same pay and conditions as public sector employees.

Justice Einfeld found that workers who had formerly been employed by the old Commonwealth Employment Service (CES), but were now employed by the privatised employment agency Employment National, were entitled to the same awards as those covering the public sector.

This is a potential blow to the Federal Government's plan to allow outsourcing in other areas, such as Telstra and the Australian Defence Department.

The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) had asked the Federal Court to rule on whether or not employees in the newly privatised Employment National were entitled to the same wages and conditions that they had previously enjoyed in the public service.

The government argued that these workers should not receive the same pay and conditions because they were now working in a different market place. It said they were not entitled to the same conditions as public servants covered by the Public Service Act. The court found otherwise.

When outsourcing occurs, the test concerning the transfer of an award hinges on whether there is "substantial identity" between the service performed by the new employer and that of the former employer.

In the light of this decision, the CPSU announced that it would be preparing a case to have the Federal Court's decision apply to all 260 private employment agencies. The union believes that the court's ruling should now be extended to all private employment agencies.

Some of these are run by charitable organisations that will find it difficult, if not impossible, to match Employment National in terms of claims for back pay and improved conditions.

The Chief Executive Officer of Jobs Australia, Mr David Thompson, commented that if the claim for public service awards across the Jobs Network was accepted by the courts, "it would have serious consequences for many of our member providers who have been bound by, and have been adhering to, another Federal award."

In another related case, the High Court is soon to decide whether pay and conditions reached through enterprise agreements are supposed to carry over into businesses that have been outsourced. PPS Consultants is appealing against a Federal Court decision. The Court found that a chemist shop in Byron Bay, which had taken over banking facilities from a St. George Bank branch after it had closed down, was bound to pay St. George Bank award rates.

PPS Consultants intends to argue that the Federal Court judges erred in law when they found that awards were transferable to the outsourced business. With no transfer of property or assets between St. George Bank and the pharmacy, it claims that there can be no transfer of wages and conditions either.

The Employment National decision is the latest in a series of decisions that have prevented the erosion of outsourced workers' pay and conditions, following the implementation of the Workplace Relations Act.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell charged: the process is the punishment

GENDER POLITICS Melbourne mum goes viral on 'Safe Schools'

COVER STORIES Liberal discontents take internal struggle to Shakespearean heights

CANBERRA OBSERVED Cory Bernardi claims strong flow to his ranks

COVER STORY The rise and rise of Old King Coal

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Taiwan's 'friends' make the Beijing cut

EUTHANASIA What Boudewijn Chabot can teach Victoria



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am