January 21st 2006

  Buy Issue 2723

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: B.A. Santamaria: the making of a political warrior

EDITORIAL: Unbalanced economy: the problems ahead

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The Coalition - a rocky road ahead for 2006

NATIONAL SECURITY: How Australia should fight terrorism

POLITICAL ISSUES: Muddled thinking in green politics and ecology

MEDICAL SCIENCE: D-I-Y abortion drug RU-486 endangers women's lives

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: Western elites lack moral courage

The struggle against forgetting (letter)

Living standards and the labour market (letter)

A slogan for RU-486? (letter)

CINEMA: Paradise Now - Portrait of deranged killer as hero

CINEMA: C.S. Lewis tale brilliantly translated to big screen

BOOKS: JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH: His Life, His Politics, His Economics, by Richard Parker

Books promotion page

slogan for RU-486? (letter)

by Dr David van Gend

News Weekly, January 21, 2006

Dr Christine Tippett - a senior vice-president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists - says that Viagra is as dangerous as RU-486 but "because it is not related to the procurement of an abortion, it's seen very differently". (The Age, December 17, 2005).

Exactly. RU-486 deserves to be seen differently because, unlike Viagra and any other drug, it is intended to cause death. The slogan for Viagra is "Love Life". No prizes for devising a corresponding slogan for RU-486.

I spoke to the Senate enquiry on Thursday, December 15, directly after Dr Tippett. With due respect to her, the parliamentary debate is not about the technical safety of RU-486 - that is a matter for the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to assess, as with any other drug.

Parliament must decide whether a drug surrounded by such complex moral questions of public concern can be adequately assessed under the TGA's simplistic categories of "safety and efficacy". Or does it need extra levels of scrutiny by those elected to deal with such complex questions as the justifiable taking of innocent life?

Let the Government retain policy responsibility for RU-486, and authorise it for valid medical reasons - including abortion, should it be medically essential - but never as a mere human pesticide designed to serve abortion for non-medical reasons.

Dr David van Gend,
Toowoomba, Qld.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am