February 4th 2006

  Buy Issue 2724

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Bushfires: the lessons of history

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Unanswered questions about oil-for-food scam

NATIONAL SECURITY: How prepared are our intelligence agencies?

INTERNATIONAL TRADE: Australia left holding trade's $1-billion-dollar baby

TAXATION: Government's dilemma - "future fund" or tax cuts?

PRIMARY PRODUCTION: SA egg producers at breaking point

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Some like it hot / Thatcher the chemist / Turks in denial

AUSTRALIAN SOCIETY: Whatever has gone wrong with sex?

SCHOOLS: Subversive agenda of multicultural education

EMBRYO EXPERIMENTATION: Cells, lies and Korea-gate

HEALTH: 4,000 submissions to RU-486 abortion pill inquiry

Civilisation's fragile fabric (letter)

So, who's to blame? (letter)

Packer 'dumbed down' Australia (letter)

CINEMA: Good Night, and Good Luck: Hollywood spin on the McCarthy era

BOOKS: The Pope Benedict Code, by Joanna Bogle

BOOKS: What Our Mothers Didn't Tell Us: Why Happiness Eludes the Modern Woman

Books promotion page

So, who's to blame? (letter)

by Wally Eves

News Weekly, February 4, 2006

There's an old saying, "To have good government, there has to be good opposition" - something Australia currently lacks.

Deep contention now runs throughout the land over John Howard's new workplace relations laws for which Howard is copping full blame. But does the blame lie entirely with him?

The labour movement, since the early postwar years, has let itself become influenced by socialist/communist philosophies instead of sticking to the traditional basic and noble ideals for which it was created - the welfare of ordinary working men and their families.

Hand in glove with that, the likes of fire-eaters Lance Sharkey, Laurie Carmichael, John Halfpenny and company relentlessly tried stirring up industrial troubles to force their radical philosophies onto the Labor Party via the trade unions.

Despite Labor wins at the federal level during the postwar period, the party seemed to remain unaware, either blissfully or deliberately, that Australians wanted no part of those lifestyles. That clear-cut message continued to go unheeded until the party eventually reached virtual self-destruction.

All those industrial and political chickens have finally come home to roost, and Australians now have no federal opposition to curb whatever liberties, outrageous or otherwise, that the Liberal Party might take.

Labor left the gate open, so Howard naturally walked through. How very sad.

That Howard did so is one thing, but for him to cop full blame for the new workplace relations laws, however contentious they might be, is a misplaced charge.

Blame rests more on socialist-tainted Labor governments, for so long unable to see the writing on the wall. And we are all now putting up with the consequences.

As I said, good government is not possible without good opposition.

Wally Eves,
Coogee, WA

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal in the High Court this week

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Time and timing are crucial to Cardinal Pell's appeal by Peter Westmore

COVER STORY The world has changed: Now for the new order

COVER STORY Beyond the Great Divide

COVER STORY Murray River full; reservoirs low; farms for sale ...

ILLICIT DRUGS Cannabis marketed to children in Colorado

EDITORIAL Holden, China, covid19: Time for industry reset

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm