March 25th 2000

  Buy Issue 2579

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Telstra - is there another way forward?

COVER STORY: Aged Care: where to from here?

BOOKS: 'The High Price of Heaven', by David Marr

TAIWAN: Taiwan election presents new challenge for Beijing

ECONOMICS: World economy: the rhetoric, the reality

PAKISTAN: Feudalism: root cause of Pakistan’s malaise

BUSINESS: Innovation, technology and the forces of change

Letter: Free trade and predatory policies


AGRICULTURE: How government kick-started land settlement

LAW: No Native Title on mining leases: Federal Court

POLITICS: SA swings away from major parties

FAMILY: Mr Howard’s "forgotten people": Australia’s families

JUSTICE: The facts behind the furore on mandatory sentencing

COMMENT: The war against drugs is not lost it was never started

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Immigration policy: whose view will prevail?

Letter: Federal control of resource development

Books promotion page

Letter: Federal control of resource development

by J. Barich

News Weekly, March 25, 2000


As a great admirer of Professor Lance Endersbee and his contribution to national thinking on resource development, I am most reluctant to contradict one aspect of his article, "Borrowed money, borrowed time" (NW, March 11, 2000)

While I agree that Australia could benefit from better policy co-ordination between the Federal Government and the States, it would be suicidal to go down the road of unitary government and make Canberra the sole controller of our destiny.

Having worked for 26 years in a number of Federal Departments in Canberra, including 11 in the Prime Minister's Department, which has the prime responsibility for policy co-ordination, I can well understand the need to have a more co-ordinated approach to development issues.

However, total control by Canberra would be an unmitigated disaster. The Whitlam Government tried as much, and failed.

Our Federation, for all its faults, has served us well, unlike the Clayton's Yugoslav Federation, or the Federation that Indonesia would dearly love to have to avoid the civil unrest which is occurring at present.

The Commonwealth's power of the purse should be a sufficient carrot to get sound national policies, without the need for more centralisation in Canberra.

J. Barich
Ardross, WA

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am