April 15th 2006

  Buy Issue 2729

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Uranium export deal rewards China

EDITORIAL: Globalism: Australia at risk

SPECIAL FEATURE: Sujiatun Camp inmates murdered for their body parts

CANBERRA OBSERVED: What Labor will do about uranium mining

ECONOMICS: Should the Australian dollar fall below US 40 cents . . .

AFTER CYCLONE LARRY: Inadequate infrastructure and disaster insurance

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: Bid to elevate status of same-sex unions

TAXATION: NSW Liberal MP calls for tax reform for families

FAMILY LAW: Divorcing dads let down again

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Count your fingers after you shake hands / Dragon's share / Moralists with ghoulish interests

REGIONAL ECONOMIC POLICY: A single currency for East Asia? (Part 1)

JAPAN: Quiet revolution in Japan's strategic thinking

SCIENCE: Scientist calls for death to humanity

Superior tradition of social democracy (letter)

Beazley's downside (letter)

BOOKS: DO NOT DISTURB: Is the media failing Australia?, edited by Robert Manne

BOOKS: SHENANIGANS on the Ovens goldfields: the 1859 election, by Antony O'Brien

Books promotion page

NSW Liberal MP calls for tax reform for families

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, April 15, 2006
Federal MP, Alan Cadman, has proposed replacing the child-care rebate with direct cash payments to parents who can then choose to spend it on either institutionalised child-care or home-based child-care.

Alan Cadman, the Sydney Liberal MP who co-founded the Coalition's Family Policy Group, has called for a major reform of the tax system to put more money back into families. A feature of the proposal is to abolish the child-care rebate - which is only available to parents who use child care - and to make direct payments to parents with young children.

The Cadman plan is designed to address a number of problems with the existing tax system. Currently, high effective marginal tax rates reduce the choices for families as to whether a second parent should do paid work or remain at home to care for children.

The current system is also inequitable. Mr Cadman said, "Families on similar incomes get vastly different assistance for their children. For, example, families on $60,000 get $10,000 per child if they utilise formal child care but only $1,773 if they use informal care or no care."

Additionally, the proposal he has put forward will remove the complexity of the present system, and provide prompt payment for parents with children. (The payment of the Child Care Rebate occurs on average 21 months after the expenditure has been incurred).

Mr Cadman's proposal involves removing the income test on Family Tax Benefit A (FTBA) for children under 5 years old, increasing FTBA to $4,600 per child, leaving unchanged other benefits, and removing the 30 per cent Child Care Rebate.

Mr Cadman told ABC Radio's The World Today that, for parents with young children, the choice of paid work or caring for children was a particularly difficult one.

He said, "All surveys and everything that's been done recently by government departments indicate that is the hard choice. The work and home choice is the hard one for parents with young children. They find it very difficult to find a satisfactory solution, and it is one of the factors that brings most stress into young families. ...

"We're proposing that there be a payment of $4,600, approximately, for children under the age of five, and that would allow parents, whose joint income is approximately $90,000 or less, to benefit from that and be able to exercise real choice about work and home."

Independently costed

Mr Cadman's proposal has been independently costed at about $1.75 billion dollars, far less than the budget surplus foreshadowed by the Treasurer, Peter Costello.

Because the child-care rebate was an election promise, the Treasurer has indicated his reluctance to drop it.

Mr Costello is also facing pressure from high-income earners, including former merchant banker, Malcolm Turnbull, to cut the top marginal tax rate.

Mr Cadman told The Australian, "Unlike Malcolm Turnbull and some of the comments of the Treasurer, it is the firm belief of many that family taxation, especially where there are children, needs to be resolved before any general changes to the tax scales."

He said that his proposal would target all families, and not just those currently utilising child care. He said: "The proposal continues to provide for those presently using child care but also improves choice for other families."

  • Peter Westmore

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am